Modeling the Impact of Vaccine Dose Prioritization Strategies During the 2022 Mpox Outbreak.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH American journal of epidemiology Pub Date : 2025-03-11 DOI:10.1093/aje/kwaf054
Patrick A Clay, Emily D Pollock, Enrique M Saldarriaga, Preeti Pathela, Michelle Macaraig, Jane R Zucker, Bindy Crouch, Ian Kracalik, Ian H Spicknall
{"title":"Modeling the Impact of Vaccine Dose Prioritization Strategies During the 2022 Mpox Outbreak.","authors":"Patrick A Clay, Emily D Pollock, Enrique M Saldarriaga, Preeti Pathela, Michelle Macaraig, Jane R Zucker, Bindy Crouch, Ian Kracalik, Ian H Spicknall","doi":"10.1093/aje/kwaf054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Early in the 2022 mpox outbreak, the U.S. recommendation was to administer two doses of the JYNNEOS® vaccine 4 weeks apart. However, because of limited vaccine supply, New York City (NYC) prioritized single dose vaccination. We estimated mpox cases averted by this strategy compared to strategies that prioritized 2-dose vaccination for a smaller portion of the population. We fit a network transmission model to incident mpox cases in NYC. Model output consisted of predicted cases over time when vaccine doses were administered with the 'first-dose priority' strategy, compared with counterfactual simulations where doses were administered to those eligible for a second dose ahead of those waiting for a first dose ('intermediate' strategy), or where individuals were pre-allocated full courses of the vaccine ('second-dose priority' strategy). We estimate that NYC's strategy averted 66% [IQR:47%-78%] of potential mpox cases compared to no vaccination. This 'first-dose priority' strategy averted 0.6% [IQR:-11%-9.8%] more cases than the 'intermediate' strategy, and 17% [IQR:2.9%-38%] more cases than the 'second-dose priority' strategy. Thus, for the 2022 mpox outbreak in NYC, pre-allocating vaccine doses to ensure full vaccination in a high-priority subset of the population would have increased the size of the outbreak.</p>","PeriodicalId":7472,"journal":{"name":"American journal of epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12311848/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwaf054","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Early in the 2022 mpox outbreak, the U.S. recommendation was to administer two doses of the JYNNEOS® vaccine 4 weeks apart. However, because of limited vaccine supply, New York City (NYC) prioritized single dose vaccination. We estimated mpox cases averted by this strategy compared to strategies that prioritized 2-dose vaccination for a smaller portion of the population. We fit a network transmission model to incident mpox cases in NYC. Model output consisted of predicted cases over time when vaccine doses were administered with the 'first-dose priority' strategy, compared with counterfactual simulations where doses were administered to those eligible for a second dose ahead of those waiting for a first dose ('intermediate' strategy), or where individuals were pre-allocated full courses of the vaccine ('second-dose priority' strategy). We estimate that NYC's strategy averted 66% [IQR:47%-78%] of potential mpox cases compared to no vaccination. This 'first-dose priority' strategy averted 0.6% [IQR:-11%-9.8%] more cases than the 'intermediate' strategy, and 17% [IQR:2.9%-38%] more cases than the 'second-dose priority' strategy. Thus, for the 2022 mpox outbreak in NYC, pre-allocating vaccine doses to ensure full vaccination in a high-priority subset of the population would have increased the size of the outbreak.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2022年麻疹暴发期间疫苗剂量优先策略的影响建模
在2022年麻疹暴发初期,美国建议间隔4周接种两剂JYNNEOS®疫苗。然而,由于疫苗供应有限,纽约市优先考虑单剂疫苗接种。我们估计通过这一策略避免的mpox病例与在较小部分人群中优先接种2剂疫苗的策略相比。我们将网络传播模型拟合到纽约市的麻疹事件中。模型输出包括以“第一剂优先”策略接种疫苗剂量时随时间推移的预测病例,与反事实模拟(在等待第一剂的人之前向有资格获得第二剂剂量的人接种疫苗(“中间”策略)或个人预先分配完整疗程的疫苗(“第二剂优先”策略)进行比较。我们估计,与未接种疫苗相比,纽约市的策略避免了66% [IQR:47%-78%]的潜在m痘病例。这种“第一剂优先”策略比“中间”策略多避免0.6% [IQR:-11%-9.8%]的病例,比“第二剂优先”策略多避免17% [IQR:2.9%-38%]的病例。因此,对于2022年纽约市的mpox暴发,预先分配疫苗剂量以确保在高优先级人群中完全接种疫苗将增加暴发的规模。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of epidemiology
American journal of epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
221
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Epidemiology is the oldest and one of the premier epidemiologic journals devoted to the publication of empirical research findings, opinion pieces, and methodological developments in the field of epidemiologic research. It is a peer-reviewed journal aimed at both fellow epidemiologists and those who use epidemiologic data, including public health workers and clinicians.
期刊最新文献
A new tool for pregnancy research: a unified definition for major congenital malformation across ICD eras. Bringing spatial confounding into the causal inferential fold. Neighborhood impacts of overdose prevention centers on real estate prices in New York City. Changes in financial well-being and memory function and decline in middle-aged and older adults. Including an infrequently measured time-varying error-prone covariate in survival analyses: a simulation-based comparison of methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1