Single-Item Screening for Depression in Adults (50+) with History of Traumatic Brain Injury.

IF 2.1 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology Pub Date : 2025-08-25 DOI:10.1093/arclin/acaf023
Summer N Rolin, Jeremy J Davis
{"title":"Single-Item Screening for Depression in Adults (50+) with History of Traumatic Brain Injury.","authors":"Summer N Rolin, Jeremy J Davis","doi":"10.1093/arclin/acaf023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Single-item depression screening has shown utility in young adult samples with limited work focused on individuals 50 and older. We examined single-item depression screening in adults 50 and older with a history of TBI one year post-injury.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This project involved secondary analysis of deidentified TRACK-TBI data. The sample (N = 508) included 61 control participants and 447 cases grouped by TBI severity. Outcome measures included the Brief Symptom Inventory-18 depression scale (BSI-D) and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). Depression was determined psychometrically by BSI-D (≥63 T) and PHQ-9 (≥10) if either score was above the cutoff. The Rivermead Postconcussion Symptoms Questionnaire depression item (RPQ-D) was used in logistic regression (LR) and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses to predict depression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Depression was observed in 16.1% of cases and 6.6% of control participants (p = .05) with non-significant variability across TBI severity (12.9-18.3%; p = .17). The LR model with age, education, TBI severity, and RPQ-D as predictors was significant with age and RPQ-D as significant predictors. The model classified 87.9% of participants correctly. The area under the ROC curve was 0.86. The optimal cutoff was RPQ-D ≥ 2.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Single-item screening for depression is a suitable approach in adults 50 and older with a history of TBI.</p>","PeriodicalId":8176,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":"1181-1187"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acaf023","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Single-item depression screening has shown utility in young adult samples with limited work focused on individuals 50 and older. We examined single-item depression screening in adults 50 and older with a history of TBI one year post-injury.

Method: This project involved secondary analysis of deidentified TRACK-TBI data. The sample (N = 508) included 61 control participants and 447 cases grouped by TBI severity. Outcome measures included the Brief Symptom Inventory-18 depression scale (BSI-D) and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). Depression was determined psychometrically by BSI-D (≥63 T) and PHQ-9 (≥10) if either score was above the cutoff. The Rivermead Postconcussion Symptoms Questionnaire depression item (RPQ-D) was used in logistic regression (LR) and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses to predict depression.

Results: Depression was observed in 16.1% of cases and 6.6% of control participants (p = .05) with non-significant variability across TBI severity (12.9-18.3%; p = .17). The LR model with age, education, TBI severity, and RPQ-D as predictors was significant with age and RPQ-D as significant predictors. The model classified 87.9% of participants correctly. The area under the ROC curve was 0.86. The optimal cutoff was RPQ-D ≥ 2.

Conclusion: Single-item screening for depression is a suitable approach in adults 50 and older with a history of TBI.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
创伤性脑损伤史成人(50岁以上)抑郁单项筛查
背景:单项抑郁症筛查在年轻人样本中显示出效用,但有限的工作集中在50岁及以上的个体。我们对创伤后一年有创伤性脑损伤病史的50岁及以上的成年人进行单项抑郁筛查。方法:本项目涉及对未识别的TRACK-TBI数据进行二次分析。样本(N = 508)包括61名对照参与者和447例按TBI严重程度分组的患者。结果测量包括简要症状量表-18抑郁量表(BSI-D)和患者健康问卷-9 (PHQ-9)。如果BSI-D(≥63 T)和PHQ-9(≥10)得分高于临界值,则采用心理测量学方法测定抑郁。采用Rivermead脑震荡后症状问卷抑郁项目(RPQ-D)进行logistic回归(LR)和受试者工作特征(ROC)分析来预测抑郁。结果:16.1%的病例和6.6%的对照组出现抑郁(p = 0.05),不同程度的TBI患者无显著差异(12.9-18.3%;p = .17)。以年龄、教育程度、TBI严重程度和RPQ-D为预测因子的LR模型以年龄和RPQ-D为显著预测因子显著。该模型对87.9%的参与者进行了正确分类。ROC曲线下面积为0.86。最佳临界值为RPQ-D≥2。结论:单项抑郁筛查对50岁及以上有创伤性脑损伤病史的成年人适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
358
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal publishes original contributions dealing with psychological aspects of the etiology, diagnosis, and treatment of disorders arising out of dysfunction of the central nervous system. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology will also consider manuscripts involving the established principles of the profession of neuropsychology: (a) delivery and evaluation of services, (b) ethical and legal issues, and (c) approaches to education and training. Preference will be given to empirical reports and key reviews. Brief research reports, case studies, and commentaries on published articles (not exceeding two printed pages) will also be considered. At the discretion of the editor, rebuttals to commentaries may be invited. Occasional papers of a theoretical nature will be considered.
期刊最新文献
NIH Toolbox Cognition Performance in Older Adults with Normal Cognition, Mild Cognitive Impairment, and Mild Dementia of the Alzheimer's Type: Results from the ARMADA Study. Quebec French Version of the Hayling Sentence Completion Test: Error Scoring Guidelines, Normative Data for Adults and the Elderly and Validation Study in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer's Disease. Remote Neuropsychological Testing as an Alternative to Traditional Methods-a Convergent Validity Study. The TIE-93: a Facial Emotion Recognition Test Adapted for Culturally, Linguistically, and Educationally Diverse Alzheimer's Dementia Patients in France. Cognitive Correlates of Resilience in Adults Experiencing Homelessness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1