Attitudes regarding the safety of in-clinic and self-managed abortion methods among the US general public in early 2022.

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q2 FAMILY STUDIES Culture, Health & Sexuality Pub Date : 2025-03-03 DOI:10.1080/13691058.2025.2469274
Rosalyn Schroeder, Lauren Ralph, Shelly Kaller, M Antonia Biggs
{"title":"Attitudes regarding the safety of in-clinic and self-managed abortion methods among the US general public in early 2022.","authors":"Rosalyn Schroeder, Lauren Ralph, Shelly Kaller, M Antonia Biggs","doi":"10.1080/13691058.2025.2469274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Medication abortion (MAB) is extremely safe-including when accessed outside the formal healthcare system-yet misinformation about its safety often influences policy, and research regarding public perceptions about its safety remains limited. In 2021-2022, we administered a US national probability-based online survey to 7,376 English- and/or Spanish-speaking people assigned female (AFAB, ages 15-49; <i>N</i> = 7,016) or male at birth (AMAB, ages 18-49; <i>N</i> = 360) to assess perceptions of MAB and self-managed abortion method safety. To identify characteristics associated with safety attitudes, we estimated weighted proportions and conducted multivariable multinomial logistic regressions. While approximately half of respondents believed MAB is safe when obtained in-clinic (52% AFAB/43% AMAB), very few believed it is safe when obtained outside the formal healthcare system (7% AFAB/5% AMAB). In multivariable analyses, prior awareness of MAB and the belief that abortion should be legal were associated with the belief that MAB is safe, both when accessed in-clinic and outside the formal healthcare system. Respondents living in US states that were restrictive to abortion rights/access were less likely to agree that in-clinic MAB is safe compared to those in protective abortion policy environments. The general public holds misinformation about the safety of MAB, particularly when obtained outside the formal healthcare system.</p>","PeriodicalId":10799,"journal":{"name":"Culture, Health & Sexuality","volume":" ","pages":"1-20"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Culture, Health & Sexuality","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2025.2469274","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Medication abortion (MAB) is extremely safe-including when accessed outside the formal healthcare system-yet misinformation about its safety often influences policy, and research regarding public perceptions about its safety remains limited. In 2021-2022, we administered a US national probability-based online survey to 7,376 English- and/or Spanish-speaking people assigned female (AFAB, ages 15-49; N = 7,016) or male at birth (AMAB, ages 18-49; N = 360) to assess perceptions of MAB and self-managed abortion method safety. To identify characteristics associated with safety attitudes, we estimated weighted proportions and conducted multivariable multinomial logistic regressions. While approximately half of respondents believed MAB is safe when obtained in-clinic (52% AFAB/43% AMAB), very few believed it is safe when obtained outside the formal healthcare system (7% AFAB/5% AMAB). In multivariable analyses, prior awareness of MAB and the belief that abortion should be legal were associated with the belief that MAB is safe, both when accessed in-clinic and outside the formal healthcare system. Respondents living in US states that were restrictive to abortion rights/access were less likely to agree that in-clinic MAB is safe compared to those in protective abortion policy environments. The general public holds misinformation about the safety of MAB, particularly when obtained outside the formal healthcare system.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2022 年初美国公众对诊所内和自我管理人工流产方法安全性的态度。
药物流产(MAB)是非常安全的——包括在正规医疗系统之外进行的流产——然而,关于其安全性的错误信息经常影响政策,关于公众对其安全性看法的研究仍然有限。在2021-2022年,我们对7376名说英语和/或西班牙语的人进行了一项基于概率的美国全国在线调查,被分配为女性(AFAB,年龄15-49岁;N = 7016)或出生时为男性(AMAB, 18-49岁;N = 360)来评估MAB和自我管理流产方法安全性的认知。为了确定与安全态度相关的特征,我们估计了加权比例并进行了多变量多项逻辑回归。虽然大约一半的受访者认为在诊所获得单克隆抗体是安全的(52% AFAB/43% AMAB),但很少有人认为在正规医疗保健系统之外获得单克隆抗体是安全的(7% AFAB/5% AMAB)。在多变量分析中,先前对MAB的认识和堕胎应该是合法的信念与MAB是安全的信念相关,无论是在诊所内还是在正规医疗保健系统之外。生活在限制堕胎权利/机会的美国各州的受访者不太可能同意与那些在保护性堕胎政策环境中的人相比,临床MAB是安全的。一般公众对单克隆抗体的安全性持有错误信息,特别是在正规卫生保健系统之外获得时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.50%
发文量
80
期刊最新文献
Understanding the increased vulnerability to sexual violence and factors that affect disclosure and support among LGBTQ+ women at a US college. Patient-provider communication and the role of PrEP coordinators: a qualitative analysis to improve HIV preventive care. 'Something about an app, you know?': narratives of everyday menstrual justice among trans and nonbinary people in Canada and the USA. We decide together, but not equally: extended family influence on women's decision-making in India. Beyond motherhood: understanding the lives of voluntarily childless women in a pronatalist society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1