Endoscopic negative pressure therapy for post-sleeve gastrectomy proximal staple line leaks: A single center experience of 40 patients.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Digestive Surgery Pub Date : 2025-03-11 DOI:10.1159/000545177
Vasiliki Christogianni, Matthias Ross, Radostina Dukovska, Ashwini Rao, Martin Buesing, Markus Reiser
{"title":"Endoscopic negative pressure therapy for post-sleeve gastrectomy proximal staple line leaks: A single center experience of 40 patients.","authors":"Vasiliki Christogianni, Matthias Ross, Radostina Dukovska, Ashwini Rao, Martin Buesing, Markus Reiser","doi":"10.1159/000545177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Post-sleeve gastrectomy (SG) proximal staple line leak is a rare yet serious complication. Endoscopic negative pressure therapy (ENPT) has emerged as a safe technique, showing promising results in treating leakages of the upper and lower gastrointestinal tract, often in conjunction with surgical interventions. A standardized treatment algorithm has not been established. This study aims to assess the safety and efficacy of ENPT in the multi-disciplinary management of proximal staple line leaks after SG.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is an observational study of 40 post-SG proximal staple line leak cases treated with an ENPT-based approach. Revisional surgery was performed in addition to ENPT in critically ill patients or nondiagnostic imaging results. Success was defined as the healing of the defect and paraluminal cavity with no further need for surgical or endoscopic intervention following ENPT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-three patients were successfully treated with ENPT (82.5% success rate). Additional surgical interventions were performed in 37 patients, with re-laparoscopy, lavage, and drain of the abdominal cavity being the most frequently performed procedures. The mean duration of treatment was 25.6 days with an average of 6.4 endoscopic interventions per patient.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ENPT is a safe and effective technique for treating proximal staple line leaks following SG. Its application should be considered alongside other endoscopic and surgical approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":11241,"journal":{"name":"Digestive Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000545177","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Post-sleeve gastrectomy (SG) proximal staple line leak is a rare yet serious complication. Endoscopic negative pressure therapy (ENPT) has emerged as a safe technique, showing promising results in treating leakages of the upper and lower gastrointestinal tract, often in conjunction with surgical interventions. A standardized treatment algorithm has not been established. This study aims to assess the safety and efficacy of ENPT in the multi-disciplinary management of proximal staple line leaks after SG.

Methods: This is an observational study of 40 post-SG proximal staple line leak cases treated with an ENPT-based approach. Revisional surgery was performed in addition to ENPT in critically ill patients or nondiagnostic imaging results. Success was defined as the healing of the defect and paraluminal cavity with no further need for surgical or endoscopic intervention following ENPT.

Results: Thirty-three patients were successfully treated with ENPT (82.5% success rate). Additional surgical interventions were performed in 37 patients, with re-laparoscopy, lavage, and drain of the abdominal cavity being the most frequently performed procedures. The mean duration of treatment was 25.6 days with an average of 6.4 endoscopic interventions per patient.

Conclusions: ENPT is a safe and effective technique for treating proximal staple line leaks following SG. Its application should be considered alongside other endoscopic and surgical approaches.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Digestive Surgery
Digestive Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.70%
发文量
25
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: ''Digestive Surgery'' presents a comprehensive overview in the field of gastrointestinal surgery. Interdisciplinary in scope, the journal keeps the specialist aware of advances in all fields that contribute to improvements in the diagnosis and treatment of gastrointestinal disease. Particular emphasis is given to articles that evaluate not only recent clinical developments, especially clinical trials and technical innovations such as new endoscopic and laparoscopic procedures, but also relevant translational research. Each contribution is carefully aligned with the need of the digestive surgeon. Thus, the journal is an important component of the continuing medical education of surgeons who want their practice to benefit from a familiarity with new knowledge in all its dimensions.
期刊最新文献
Endoscopic negative pressure therapy for post-sleeve gastrectomy proximal staple line leaks: A single center experience of 40 patients. Exploration of risk factors and an identification signature for bacteremia in acute cholecystitis. The role of staging laparoscopy in stage IV gastric cancer patients. Empiric Antimicrobial Treatment of Anastomotic Leakage after Esophageal Resection: The most commonly used antimicrobial regimens in The Netherlands and an antimicrobial treatment recommendation based on a single center population. Impact of Robotic Surgery on Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula for High-Risk Pancreaticojejunostomy after Pancreatoduodenectomy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1