Novel device therapies in heart failure: focus on patient selection.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-25 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fcvm.2025.1419873
Amrita Balgobind, Daniel Asemota, Emily Rodriguez, Phuuwadith Wattanachayakul, Marat Fudim, Miguel Alvarez Villela
{"title":"Novel device therapies in heart failure: focus on patient selection.","authors":"Amrita Balgobind, Daniel Asemota, Emily Rodriguez, Phuuwadith Wattanachayakul, Marat Fudim, Miguel Alvarez Villela","doi":"10.3389/fcvm.2025.1419873","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The increasing prevalence of heart failure (HF) has led to advancements in therapeutic strategies, including the development of new pharmacological treatments and the expansion of guideline recommendations across the spectrum of left ventricular ejection fractions. Despite these advancements, the full benefits of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) are often limited by various barriers that result in incomplete implementation or suboptimal responses. For patients who cannot tolerate or only partially respond to GDMT, therapeutic options remain limited. This gap is particularly significant for those with contraindications to heart replacement therapies (HRT), such as left ventricular assist device (LVAD) or heart transplant. In light of these potential limitations, this review article proposes categorizing HF patients into four distinct phenoprofiles based on their tolerance to GDMT and candidacy for HRT. Considering these HF phenoprofiles may guide treatment decisions regarding the selection and use of novel device-based HF therapies. Furthermore, we summarize data on commercially available and emerging device-based HF therapies, evaluating their clinical utility, mechanisms of action, and selection criteria based on current evidence. Finally, we describe clinical cases across various proposed HF phenoprofiles to illustrate how these HF profiles can guide the use of novel device-based therapies to achieve clinical stability, improve GDMT tolerance, or serve as a bridge to, or be used in tandem with HRT in select patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":12414,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine","volume":"12 ","pages":"1419873"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11893582/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2025.1419873","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The increasing prevalence of heart failure (HF) has led to advancements in therapeutic strategies, including the development of new pharmacological treatments and the expansion of guideline recommendations across the spectrum of left ventricular ejection fractions. Despite these advancements, the full benefits of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) are often limited by various barriers that result in incomplete implementation or suboptimal responses. For patients who cannot tolerate or only partially respond to GDMT, therapeutic options remain limited. This gap is particularly significant for those with contraindications to heart replacement therapies (HRT), such as left ventricular assist device (LVAD) or heart transplant. In light of these potential limitations, this review article proposes categorizing HF patients into four distinct phenoprofiles based on their tolerance to GDMT and candidacy for HRT. Considering these HF phenoprofiles may guide treatment decisions regarding the selection and use of novel device-based HF therapies. Furthermore, we summarize data on commercially available and emerging device-based HF therapies, evaluating their clinical utility, mechanisms of action, and selection criteria based on current evidence. Finally, we describe clinical cases across various proposed HF phenoprofiles to illustrate how these HF profiles can guide the use of novel device-based therapies to achieve clinical stability, improve GDMT tolerance, or serve as a bridge to, or be used in tandem with HRT in select patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心力衰竭的新设备治疗:关注患者选择。
心力衰竭(HF)患病率的增加导致了治疗策略的进步,包括新药物治疗的发展和左心室射血分数谱指南建议的扩展。尽管取得了这些进步,但指南导向药物治疗(GDMT)的全部益处往往受到各种障碍的限制,导致不完全实施或次优反应。对于不能耐受或仅部分响应GDMT的患者,治疗选择仍然有限。对于那些有心脏替代疗法(HRT)禁忌症的患者,如左心室辅助装置(LVAD)或心脏移植,这一差距尤为显著。鉴于这些潜在的局限性,这篇综述文章建议根据患者对GDMT的耐受性和HRT的候选性将HF患者分为四种不同的表型。考虑到这些心衰表型可以指导治疗决策的选择和使用新的装置为基础的心衰治疗。此外,我们总结了商业上可用的和新兴的基于器械的心衰治疗的数据,评估了它们的临床效用、作用机制和基于现有证据的选择标准。最后,我们描述了各种提出的HF表型的临床病例,以说明这些HF表型如何指导使用新的基于设备的治疗方法来实现临床稳定性,提高GDMT耐受性,或在选定的患者中作为HRT的桥梁或与HRT串联使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
11.10%
发文量
3529
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers? Which frontiers? Where exactly are the frontiers of cardiovascular medicine? And who should be defining these frontiers? At Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine we believe it is worth being curious to foresee and explore beyond the current frontiers. In other words, we would like, through the articles published by our community journal Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, to anticipate the future of cardiovascular medicine, and thus better prevent cardiovascular disorders and improve therapeutic options and outcomes of our patients.
期刊最新文献
Global burden of disease attributable to high fasting plasma glucose from 1990 to 2021: a spatiotemporal analysis of global burden of disease 2021. Efficacy and safety of clopidogrel and aspirin in patients with chronic coronary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Modulation of CCR2/CCL2 molecular axis in the expansion and rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Case Report: Neurogenic pulmonary edema coupled with myocardial damage following tenecteplase thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke. The lipid lowering efficacy of PCSK9 inhibitors alone vs. statins alone: a meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1