Perceptions and Use of Germline Genetic Testing Among Patients With Prostate Cancer.

IF 4.6 3区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY JCO oncology practice Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-03 DOI:10.1200/OP-24-00624
Laura B Beidler, Kimberly Zayhowski, Mary Nahorniak, Stephanie Loo, Gretchen A Gignac, Catharine Wang, Christine M Gunn
{"title":"Perceptions and Use of Germline Genetic Testing Among Patients With Prostate Cancer.","authors":"Laura B Beidler, Kimberly Zayhowski, Mary Nahorniak, Stephanie Loo, Gretchen A Gignac, Catharine Wang, Christine M Gunn","doi":"10.1200/OP-24-00624","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Many patients with prostate cancer are eligible for germline genetic testing, but it is underutilized in clinical practice. We aimed to explore perceptions of and decision making about undergoing genetic testing among patients with prostate cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This qualitative interview study enrolled patients diagnosed with prostate cancer who had been treated at a safety-net hospital and had received a referral for genetic testing in the previous 12 months. Participants completed an interview in their native language via telephone. Data on genetic testing use were captured in interviews and via the medical record. A thematic analysis explored factors related to decision making in concert with genetic testing use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-three English-speaking (n = 25), Spanish-speaking (n = 6), and Haitian Creole-speaking (n = 2) patients completed interviews. In interviews, 19 reported completing genetic testing, 10 reported no testing, and four were unsure. Medical records indicated 24 had undergone genetic testing-including six participants whose self-reported testing status was no or unsure. Four main themes identified factors that influenced participant-reported genetic testing decisions: gendered perceptions of value to family, personal utility of genetic results, preferences for information, and relative priority of testing. Many participants did not view testing as a priority and delayed or declined testing because of cancer treatment burden.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results suggest opportunities to improve communication about testing purpose, value, and utility in those affected by cancer. Conversations about the utility of both the individual benefit of obtaining genetic testing for those affected by prostate cancer and implications for familial cascade testing are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":14612,"journal":{"name":"JCO oncology practice","volume":" ","pages":"1468-1474"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO oncology practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/OP-24-00624","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Many patients with prostate cancer are eligible for germline genetic testing, but it is underutilized in clinical practice. We aimed to explore perceptions of and decision making about undergoing genetic testing among patients with prostate cancer.

Methods: This qualitative interview study enrolled patients diagnosed with prostate cancer who had been treated at a safety-net hospital and had received a referral for genetic testing in the previous 12 months. Participants completed an interview in their native language via telephone. Data on genetic testing use were captured in interviews and via the medical record. A thematic analysis explored factors related to decision making in concert with genetic testing use.

Results: Thirty-three English-speaking (n = 25), Spanish-speaking (n = 6), and Haitian Creole-speaking (n = 2) patients completed interviews. In interviews, 19 reported completing genetic testing, 10 reported no testing, and four were unsure. Medical records indicated 24 had undergone genetic testing-including six participants whose self-reported testing status was no or unsure. Four main themes identified factors that influenced participant-reported genetic testing decisions: gendered perceptions of value to family, personal utility of genetic results, preferences for information, and relative priority of testing. Many participants did not view testing as a priority and delayed or declined testing because of cancer treatment burden.

Conclusion: These results suggest opportunities to improve communication about testing purpose, value, and utility in those affected by cancer. Conversations about the utility of both the individual benefit of obtaining genetic testing for those affected by prostate cancer and implications for familial cascade testing are warranted.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
前列腺癌患者生殖系基因检测的认知和使用。
目的:许多前列腺癌患者有资格进行生殖系基因检测,但在临床实践中未得到充分利用。我们旨在探讨前列腺癌患者对接受基因检测的认知和决策。方法:本定性访谈研究纳入了在安全网医院接受治疗并在过去12个月内接受转介进行基因检测的诊断为前列腺癌的患者。参与者通过电话以他们的母语完成了访谈。基因检测使用的数据是通过访谈和医疗记录获取的。一项专题分析探讨了与基因检测使用有关的决策因素。结果:33名说英语(n = 25)、说西班牙语(n = 6)和说海地克里奥尔语(n = 2)的患者完成了访谈。在采访中,19人报告完成了基因检测,10人报告没有检测,4人不确定。医疗记录显示,24人接受了基因检测,其中包括6名自我报告没有或不确定检测状态的参与者。四个主要主题确定了影响参与者报告的基因检测决策的因素:性别对家庭价值的看法,遗传结果的个人效用,对信息的偏好以及测试的相对优先级。由于癌症治疗负担,许多参与者没有将检测视为优先事项,推迟或拒绝检测。结论:这些结果表明,有机会在受癌症影响的人群中加强关于检测目的、价值和效用的沟通。对前列腺癌患者进行基因检测的个人利益和家族级联检测的意义的讨论是有必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.50%
发文量
518
期刊最新文献
Late Effects of Chemotherapy on Patient-Reported Neuropathy, Balance Problems, and Fall Outcomes Among Older Breast Cancer Survivors. Same-Day Multidisciplinary Clinics for Patients With Newly Diagnosed Adult Solid Tumor Cancer: A Systematic Review. Comparison of Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients With Metastatic Prostate Cancer With and Without Next-Generation Sequencing Testing. Incarceration and Cancer Mortality: Rethinking Structural Determinants of Oncology Outcomes. The Opportunity and Need to Improve Young Adult Survivors' Health Insurance Literacy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1