Abdominal Wall Reinforcement Using OviTex after Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Journal of reconstructive microsurgery Pub Date : 2025-03-11 DOI:10.1055/a-2555-2348
Alec S McCranie, Caitlin Blades, Steven Dawson, Jose Foppiani, Taylor Allenby, Julian Winocour, Justin Cohen, David Woodbridge Mathes, Christodoulos Kaoutzanis
{"title":"Abdominal Wall Reinforcement Using OviTex after Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap.","authors":"Alec S McCranie, Caitlin Blades, Steven Dawson, Jose Foppiani, Taylor Allenby, Julian Winocour, Justin Cohen, David Woodbridge Mathes, Christodoulos Kaoutzanis","doi":"10.1055/a-2555-2348","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Abdominal wall bulges and hernias are not uncommon complications following deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap harvest. Abdominal wall reinforcement using synthetic meshes has been found to decrease bulges by up to 70%; however, such meshes can be associated with other issues such as seromas and infections. Reinforced tissue matrix (RTM) mesh can be used for abdominal wall reinforcement due to its ability to recruit fibroblasts and provide a scaffold for cellular proliferation. There is no literature on the use of OviTex mesh for abdominal wall reinforcement following DIEP flap harvest. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of its use in this setting. Methods A retrospective review was performed on patients undergoing DIEP flap harvest between 01/2020-06/2023. Patients who had completed at least 12 months of follow-up visits were included. Descriptive, univariate, and multiple logistic regression analysis were completed. Results A total of 199 patients were included. The mean age at the time of surgery was 51.1±10.0 years and the mean body mass index was 30.2±5.9 kg/m2. Abdominal wall reinforcement was completed in 85 (42.7%) patients. Patients that had OviTex placed developed fewer bulges compared to the non-mesh cohort(0% vs 5.3%, P=0.04). Furthermore, OviTex mesh did not increase adverse events and was not significantly different in seroma/hematoma rates when compared to the non-mesh cohort (10.6% vs 5.3%, P=0.26). Conclusion This study demonstrates that OviTex mesh is safe and efficacious in reducing the rate of bulges following DIEP flap harvest without increasing other complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":16949,"journal":{"name":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2555-2348","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Abdominal wall bulges and hernias are not uncommon complications following deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap harvest. Abdominal wall reinforcement using synthetic meshes has been found to decrease bulges by up to 70%; however, such meshes can be associated with other issues such as seromas and infections. Reinforced tissue matrix (RTM) mesh can be used for abdominal wall reinforcement due to its ability to recruit fibroblasts and provide a scaffold for cellular proliferation. There is no literature on the use of OviTex mesh for abdominal wall reinforcement following DIEP flap harvest. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of its use in this setting. Methods A retrospective review was performed on patients undergoing DIEP flap harvest between 01/2020-06/2023. Patients who had completed at least 12 months of follow-up visits were included. Descriptive, univariate, and multiple logistic regression analysis were completed. Results A total of 199 patients were included. The mean age at the time of surgery was 51.1±10.0 years and the mean body mass index was 30.2±5.9 kg/m2. Abdominal wall reinforcement was completed in 85 (42.7%) patients. Patients that had OviTex placed developed fewer bulges compared to the non-mesh cohort(0% vs 5.3%, P=0.04). Furthermore, OviTex mesh did not increase adverse events and was not significantly different in seroma/hematoma rates when compared to the non-mesh cohort (10.6% vs 5.3%, P=0.26). Conclusion This study demonstrates that OviTex mesh is safe and efficacious in reducing the rate of bulges following DIEP flap harvest without increasing other complications.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
28.60%
发文量
80
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery is a peer-reviewed, indexed journal that provides an international forum for the publication of articles focusing on reconstructive microsurgery and complex reconstructive surgery. The journal was originally established in 1984 for the microsurgical community to publish and share academic papers. The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery provides the latest in original research spanning basic laboratory, translational, and clinical investigations. Review papers cover current topics in complex reconstruction and microsurgery. In addition, special sections discuss new technologies, innovations, materials, and significant problem cases. The journal welcomes controversial topics, editorial comments, book reviews, and letters to the Editor, in order to complete the balanced spectrum of information available in the Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery. All articles undergo stringent peer review by international experts in the specialty.
期刊最新文献
A Comparison of SIEA/SCIA and DIEP Flaps for Autologous Breast Reconstruction. A Review of Minimally Invasive Techniques for Perfusion Optimization of Flaps. Abdominal Wall Reinforcement Using OviTex after Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap. Effect on Timing of Free Flap Breast Reconstruction on Mastectomy Skin Necrosis. Evaluating the Merit and Applications of the Caprini Risk Score as a Complication Predictor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1