Social Vulnerability Associated With Frequency of Visual Field and Optical Coherence Tomography Testing in Glaucoma Patients.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY Journal of Glaucoma Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-13 DOI:10.1097/IJG.0000000000002532
Daniel X Chen, Hannah Hashimi, Leona Ding, Karine D Bojikian, Andrew Chen
{"title":"Social Vulnerability Associated With Frequency of Visual Field and Optical Coherence Tomography Testing in Glaucoma Patients.","authors":"Daniel X Chen, Hannah Hashimi, Leona Ding, Karine D Bojikian, Andrew Chen","doi":"10.1097/IJG.0000000000002532","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Precis: </strong>Higher Social Vulnerability Index scores, limited-English proficiency, and retirement/disability status were associated with lower odds of completing one visual field and optical coherence tomography/year in glaucoma patients.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the correlation between sociodemographic factors and the Social Vulnerability Index to the likelihood of not receiving 1 visual field test and 1 retinal nerve fiber layer optical coherence tomography test per year.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patient records with glaucoma living in Washington state from a single academic institution (2014-2021) were reviewed. Those with a single visit, an address with no Social Vulnerability Index score, or a diagnosis relating to pre-glaucoma, glaucoma-suspect, or ocular hypertension were excluded. Demographic data, Social Vulnerability Index scores, and the number of visual fields and optical coherence tomography were collected. Patients were classified as meeting testing criteria if they had at least one visual field and optical coherence tomography per year. Logistic regression was used to assess whether sociodemographic factors and Social Vulnerability Index scores were associated with not meeting testing criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three thousand nine hundred seventy-one patients were included: 1470 (37.0%), 1834 (46.2%), and 1413 (35.6%), had at least 1 visual field/year, at least 1 optical coherence tomography/year, and at least 1 visual field and 1 optical coherence tomography/year, respectively. On average 0.8±0.6 visual field/year and 0.9±0.6 optical coherence tomography/year were performed. Limited English proficiency ( P =0.009), being disabled/retired ( P =0.003), and higher Social Vulnerability Index scores ( P <0.001) were associated with higher odds of not meeting testing criteria.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although higher Social Vulnerability Index scores were linked to reduced odds of glaucoma testing, specific sociodemographic factors-such as limited English proficiency and retirement/disability-further reduced the odds.</p>","PeriodicalId":15938,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Glaucoma","volume":" ","pages":"394-399"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Glaucoma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000002532","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Precis: Higher Social Vulnerability Index scores, limited-English proficiency, and retirement/disability status were associated with lower odds of completing one visual field and optical coherence tomography/year in glaucoma patients.

Purpose: To assess the correlation between sociodemographic factors and the Social Vulnerability Index to the likelihood of not receiving 1 visual field test and 1 retinal nerve fiber layer optical coherence tomography test per year.

Methods: Patient records with glaucoma living in Washington state from a single academic institution (2014-2021) were reviewed. Those with a single visit, an address with no Social Vulnerability Index score, or a diagnosis relating to pre-glaucoma, glaucoma-suspect, or ocular hypertension were excluded. Demographic data, Social Vulnerability Index scores, and the number of visual fields and optical coherence tomography were collected. Patients were classified as meeting testing criteria if they had at least one visual field and optical coherence tomography per year. Logistic regression was used to assess whether sociodemographic factors and Social Vulnerability Index scores were associated with not meeting testing criteria.

Results: Three thousand nine hundred seventy-one patients were included: 1470 (37.0%), 1834 (46.2%), and 1413 (35.6%), had at least 1 visual field/year, at least 1 optical coherence tomography/year, and at least 1 visual field and 1 optical coherence tomography/year, respectively. On average 0.8±0.6 visual field/year and 0.9±0.6 optical coherence tomography/year were performed. Limited English proficiency ( P =0.009), being disabled/retired ( P =0.003), and higher Social Vulnerability Index scores ( P <0.001) were associated with higher odds of not meeting testing criteria.

Conclusions: Although higher Social Vulnerability Index scores were linked to reduced odds of glaucoma testing, specific sociodemographic factors-such as limited English proficiency and retirement/disability-further reduced the odds.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与青光眼患者视野和光学相干断层扫描检测频率相关的社会脆弱性。
摘要:青光眼患者的社会脆弱性指数得分较高、英语水平有限和退休/残疾状况与每年完成一次视野和光学相干断层扫描的几率较低相关。目的:评估社会人口学因素和社会脆弱性指数与每年不接受一次视野检查和一次视网膜神经纤维层光学相干断层扫描检查的可能性之间的相关性。方法:回顾来自华盛顿州单一学术机构的青光眼患者记录(2014-2021)。那些只有一次就诊,地址没有社会脆弱性指数评分,或诊断与青光眼前期、青光眼疑似或高眼压有关的患者被排除在外。收集人口统计数据、社会脆弱性指数评分、视野数和光学相干断层扫描。如果患者每年至少有一次视野和光学相干断层扫描,则被归类为符合测试标准。使用Logistic回归来评估社会人口因素和社会脆弱性指数得分是否与不符合测试标准有关。结果:共纳入3971例患者:1470例(37.0%),1834例(46.2%),1413例(35.6%),分别为至少1次视野/年,至少1次光学相干断层扫描/年,至少1次视野和1次光学相干断层扫描/年。平均0.8±0.6视野/年和0.9±0.6光学相干断层扫描/年。结论:虽然较高的社会脆弱性指数得分与青光眼检测的几率降低有关,但特定的社会人口统计学因素——如英语水平有限和退休/残疾——进一步降低了青光眼检测的几率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Glaucoma
Journal of Glaucoma 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
10.00%
发文量
330
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Glaucoma is a peer reviewed journal addressing the spectrum of issues affecting definition, diagnosis, and management of glaucoma and providing a forum for lively and stimulating discussion of clinical, scientific, and socioeconomic factors affecting care of glaucoma patients.
期刊最新文献
Beta- and gamma-zone Parapapillary Atrophy in non-myopic Eyes. 3-Year Outcomes of iStent Implant Combined with Phacoemulsification in Asian Eyes with Glaucoma: A Multi-Dimensional Surgical Success Analysis. Comparing Performance of Large Language Model-Based Tools on Patient-Driven Glaucoma Inquiries. Myopic Shift Induced By Omidenepag Isopropyl 0.002% in Patients With Primary Open Angle Glaucoma. One-Year Outcomes of Hydrus Microstent Combined With Cataract Surgery: Efficacy Across Glaucoma Severity Levels.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1