Changes in Physical Training and Injury Incidence Following the Introduction of a New Military Fitness Test.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-04 DOI:10.1519/JSC.0000000000005063
Regis C Pearson, Tyson Grier, Timothy Benedict, Olivia Mahlmann, Michelle Canham-Chervak
{"title":"Changes in Physical Training and Injury Incidence Following the Introduction of a New Military Fitness Test.","authors":"Regis C Pearson, Tyson Grier, Timothy Benedict, Olivia Mahlmann, Michelle Canham-Chervak","doi":"10.1519/JSC.0000000000005063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Pearson, RC, Grier, T, Benedict, T, Mahlmann, O, and Canham-Chervak, M. Changes in physical training and injury incidence following the introduction of a new military fitness test. J Strength Cond Res 39(5): e684-e691, 2025-Physical training (PT) and injury incidence may be affected by the implementation of a new physical fitness test. Current investigation measured changes in PT and injury incidence following field testing of the Army Combat Fitness Test (ACFT). Sixty-one battalions were administered electronic surveys before and after ACFT field testing from October 2018 through June 2020. Surveys collected demographics, injury incidence, and PT within the previous 12 months. Army Combat Fitness Test records were obtained from the Digital Training Management System. Statistical significance was accepted at p ≤ 0.05. One thousand one hundred thirty-four soldiers completed both surveys. Male soldiers represented 77% (31.3 ± 8.6 years, 21.3 ± 4.3 kg·m -2 ) and female soldiers represented 23% (30.0 ± 7.8 years, 24.1 ± 3.1 kg·m -2 ) of respondents. Male soldiers reported lower unit calisthenics training, higher unit resistance training, and higher unit total exercise following field testing (minutes per week, p < 0.05). Male soldiers reported higher personal running, higher personal resistance training, lower personal obstacle course training, and lower personal total exercise after field testing (minutes per week, p < 0.05). Female soldiers reported lower unit running, higher unit resistance training, higher personal resistance training, lower personal obstacle course training, and lower personal total exercise after field testing (minutes per week, p < 0.05). After field testing, male soldiers reported a greater number of lower back injuries (+2.9%, p = 0.01) and a greater number of resistance training injuries (+1.7%, p < 0.01). Changes in specific training modalities may lead to changes in activities associated with injury. Proper technique, periodization, individualization, and recovery education are recommended to control injury incidence when a new PT program is implemented.</p>","PeriodicalId":17129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research","volume":" ","pages":"e684-e691"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000005063","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Pearson, RC, Grier, T, Benedict, T, Mahlmann, O, and Canham-Chervak, M. Changes in physical training and injury incidence following the introduction of a new military fitness test. J Strength Cond Res 39(5): e684-e691, 2025-Physical training (PT) and injury incidence may be affected by the implementation of a new physical fitness test. Current investigation measured changes in PT and injury incidence following field testing of the Army Combat Fitness Test (ACFT). Sixty-one battalions were administered electronic surveys before and after ACFT field testing from October 2018 through June 2020. Surveys collected demographics, injury incidence, and PT within the previous 12 months. Army Combat Fitness Test records were obtained from the Digital Training Management System. Statistical significance was accepted at p ≤ 0.05. One thousand one hundred thirty-four soldiers completed both surveys. Male soldiers represented 77% (31.3 ± 8.6 years, 21.3 ± 4.3 kg·m -2 ) and female soldiers represented 23% (30.0 ± 7.8 years, 24.1 ± 3.1 kg·m -2 ) of respondents. Male soldiers reported lower unit calisthenics training, higher unit resistance training, and higher unit total exercise following field testing (minutes per week, p < 0.05). Male soldiers reported higher personal running, higher personal resistance training, lower personal obstacle course training, and lower personal total exercise after field testing (minutes per week, p < 0.05). Female soldiers reported lower unit running, higher unit resistance training, higher personal resistance training, lower personal obstacle course training, and lower personal total exercise after field testing (minutes per week, p < 0.05). After field testing, male soldiers reported a greater number of lower back injuries (+2.9%, p = 0.01) and a greater number of resistance training injuries (+1.7%, p < 0.01). Changes in specific training modalities may lead to changes in activities associated with injury. Proper technique, periodization, individualization, and recovery education are recommended to control injury incidence when a new PT program is implemented.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
引入新的军事体能测试后体能训练和损伤发生率的变化。
[摘要]Pearson, RC, Grier, T, Benedict, T, Mahlmann, O, and Canham-Chervak, M.引入新的军事体能测试后体能训练和损伤发生率的变化。[J][力量杂志]XX(X): 000- 000,2024 -实施新的体能测试可能会影响体能训练(PT)和损伤发生率。目前的调查测量了陆军作战体能测试(ACFT)现场测试后PT和损伤发生率的变化。从2018年10月到2020年6月,61个营在ACFT现场测试前后进行了电子调查。调查收集了过去12个月内的人口统计数据、伤害发生率和运动能力。陆军作战体能测试记录从数字训练管理系统获得。p≤0.05为有统计学意义。一千一百三十四名士兵完成了这两项调查。男性占77%(31.3±8.6岁,21.3±4.3 kg·m-2),女性占23%(30.0±7.8岁,24.1±3.1 kg·m-2)。在现场测试后,男性士兵报告的单位健美操训练较少,单位阻力训练较多,单位总运动量较高(每周分钟数,p < 0.05)。现场测试后,男性士兵个人跑步量较高,个人阻力训练量较高,个人障碍训练量较低,个人总运动量较低(每周分钟数,p < 0.05)。女兵单位跑量较低,单位阻力训练较高,个人阻力训练较高,个人障碍训练较低,现场测试后个人总运动量较低(分钟/周,p < 0.05)。经过现场测试,男性士兵报告的下背部损伤较多(+2.9%,p = 0.01),阻力训练损伤较多(+1.7%,p < 0.01)。特定训练方式的改变可能导致与损伤相关的活动的改变。适当的技术,分期,个体化,和恢复教育建议,以控制伤害的发生率,当一个新的PT计划实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
9.40%
发文量
384
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The editorial mission of The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research (JSCR) is to advance the knowledge about strength and conditioning through research. A unique aspect of this journal is that it includes recommendations for the practical use of research findings. While the journal name identifies strength and conditioning as separate entities, strength is considered a part of conditioning. This journal wishes to promote the publication of peer-reviewed manuscripts which add to our understanding of conditioning and sport through applied exercise science.
期刊最新文献
Optimizing Performance in Women Futsal: Impact of Neuromuscular Training on Speed, Change of Direction, and Repeated Sprint Ability. The Determinants of Deceleration and Reacceleration Abilities in Pro-Agility Test in Adolescent Soccer Players. The External Game Demands of Professional, Male Basketball Players According to Playing Position and Playing Role: A Multiseason Analysis in the Australian National Basketball League. Normative Data for Physical Activity and Heart Rate Metrics of Recreational Football Among the General Male Population-The Football Cooperative Initiative. Rehydration After Exercise-Induced Fluid Losses: Comparing Flavored Water, Coconut Water, and Carbohydrate-Electrolyte Sports Beverage.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1