The Emotional Impact of Clinical Ethics Work on Clinical Ethicists: A Qualitative Study.

Q1 Arts and Humanities AJOB Empirical Bioethics Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-12 DOI:10.1080/23294515.2025.2474912
Anna D Goff, Marsha M Michie, Marcie A Lambrix, Monica L Gerrek
{"title":"The Emotional Impact of Clinical Ethics Work on Clinical Ethicists: A Qualitative Study.","authors":"Anna D Goff, Marsha M Michie, Marcie A Lambrix, Monica L Gerrek","doi":"10.1080/23294515.2025.2474912","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The experiences of clinical ethicists have recently begun to garner some attention, but very little is known about the emotional impact of clinical ethics work on clinical ethicists. The purpose of our study was to explore the experiences of clinical ethicists in the United States in order to better understand the impact that their professional responsibilities have on them as people, as well as to learn about the ways in which organizational structures and coping mechanisms help them navigate the emotional impact of their work.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a primary analysis of 34 semi-structured interviews with clinical ethicists across the United States. The interviews were conducted from May-September 2023 and were recorded, transcribed, and de-identified. The qualitative themes explored in this paper are part of a larger study informed by principles derived from grounded theory.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four major themes emerged: particular features of clinical ethics work seem to significantly impact the emotional state of clinical ethicists, lack of clarity about the role of clinical ethicists appears to significantly impact their emotional experience, organizational structures appear to shape clinical ethicists' professional and emotional experiences, and clinical ethicists employ a variety of professional and personal coping mechanisms when experiencing adverse emotions because of their professional responsibilities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings suggest that clinical ethicists are profoundly impacted by their work and that their emotional experience is shaped by a wide range of factors both at the individual and systemic level.</p>","PeriodicalId":38118,"journal":{"name":"AJOB Empirical Bioethics","volume":" ","pages":"140-150"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJOB Empirical Bioethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23294515.2025.2474912","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The experiences of clinical ethicists have recently begun to garner some attention, but very little is known about the emotional impact of clinical ethics work on clinical ethicists. The purpose of our study was to explore the experiences of clinical ethicists in the United States in order to better understand the impact that their professional responsibilities have on them as people, as well as to learn about the ways in which organizational structures and coping mechanisms help them navigate the emotional impact of their work.

Methods: This was a primary analysis of 34 semi-structured interviews with clinical ethicists across the United States. The interviews were conducted from May-September 2023 and were recorded, transcribed, and de-identified. The qualitative themes explored in this paper are part of a larger study informed by principles derived from grounded theory.

Results: Four major themes emerged: particular features of clinical ethics work seem to significantly impact the emotional state of clinical ethicists, lack of clarity about the role of clinical ethicists appears to significantly impact their emotional experience, organizational structures appear to shape clinical ethicists' professional and emotional experiences, and clinical ethicists employ a variety of professional and personal coping mechanisms when experiencing adverse emotions because of their professional responsibilities.

Conclusion: Our findings suggest that clinical ethicists are profoundly impacted by their work and that their emotional experience is shaped by a wide range of factors both at the individual and systemic level.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
临床伦理学工作对临床伦理学家的情感影响:一项定性研究。
背景:临床伦理学家的经历最近开始引起一些关注,但临床伦理学工作对临床伦理学家的情感影响知之甚少。我们研究的目的是探索美国临床伦理学家的经验,以便更好地理解他们的专业责任对他们个人的影响,以及了解组织结构和应对机制如何帮助他们驾驭工作的情感影响。方法:这是对全美34位临床伦理学家的半结构化访谈的初步分析。访谈于2023年5月至9月进行,并进行了录音、转录和去识别。本文探讨的定性主题是一项更大的研究的一部分,该研究由扎根理论衍生的原则提供信息。结果:出现了四个主要主题:临床伦理学工作的特殊性似乎显著影响临床伦理学家的情绪状态,缺乏对临床伦理学家角色的明确似乎显著影响他们的情绪体验,组织结构似乎塑造了临床伦理学家的专业和情感体验,临床伦理学家由于其职业责任而在经历不良情绪时采用了各种专业和个人应对机制。结论:我们的研究结果表明,临床伦理学家受到他们工作的深刻影响,他们的情感体验受到个人和系统层面广泛因素的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
AJOB Empirical Bioethics
AJOB Empirical Bioethics Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
Scanning the Horizon of Sociogenomics: an Assessment of the Development and Growth of Polygenic Indices for Social and Behavioral Traits. Medical Sanctions and the Response of Pharmaceutical Companies to Russia's Invasion of Ukraine: A Thematic Analysis. Survey of OB/GYN Residents Knowledge and Practice of Trauma Informed Care. Should Physicians Take the Rap? Normative Analysis of Clinician Perspectives on Responsible Use of 'Black Box' AI Tools. Development and Validation of a Stakeholder-Driven, Self-Contained Electronic Informed Consent Platform for Trio-Based Genomic Research Studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1