Changes in Vasectomy Practice Patterns After Dobbs: A Multi-Institutional Study.

IF 1.7 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Urology Practice Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-11 DOI:10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000810
Rutul D Patel, Justin Loloi, Reza Kianian, Juan J Andino, Dattatraya Patil, Akanksha Mehta, Tenny R Zhang, Jonathan Gal, Robert Fisch, Susan M MacDonald, Crystal L Valadon, Ajay K Nangia, Avi Sura, Robert C Welliver, Kara Watts
{"title":"Changes in Vasectomy Practice Patterns After Dobbs: A Multi-Institutional Study.","authors":"Rutul D Patel, Justin Loloi, Reza Kianian, Juan J Andino, Dattatraya Patil, Akanksha Mehta, Tenny R Zhang, Jonathan Gal, Robert Fisch, Susan M MacDonald, Crystal L Valadon, Ajay K Nangia, Avi Sura, Robert C Welliver, Kara Watts","doi":"10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000810","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Following the Dobbs decision overruling <i>Roe v Wade</i>, public interest in vasectomies increased. This ruling directly affected urologic practice patterns and warrants further investigation. We aimed to conduct a multi-institutional study quantifying the change in vasectomy practice volume between the pre-Dobbs (PD) and after-Dobbs (AD) eras.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Multiple geographically distinct US academic medical centers participated in the study. Patients with an initial vasectomy consult between January 1, 2021, and December 31, 2022, were included and categorized as pre-Dobbs (January 1, 2021-June 24, 2022) and after-Dobbs (June 25, 2022-December 31, 2022). Dates of subsequent vasectomy procedures and patient demographic information were compared between the 2 groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 4326 initial vasectomy consults were analyzed. Among these, 3691 had subsequent vasectomies (2742 pre-Dobbs [152 cases/mo] vs 949 AD [158 cases/mo]). Men in the AD group were more likely to be younger (median age 38 years vs 39 years, <i>P</i> < .001), non-Hispanic White (68% vs 64%, <i>P</i> = .009), English speaking (94% vs 91%, <i>P</i> = .005), and privately insured (92% vs 89%, <i>P</i> = .008). The AD group also had fewer children (median number 2 [1-2] vs 2 [2-3], <i>P</i> < .001) and longer median wait time between the vasectomy consult and procedure (56 days vs 52, <i>P</i> < .001). Married men in the AD group were more likely to be childless (11% vs 5%, <i>P</i> < .001), as were single men (40% vs 23%, <i>P</i> < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Dobbs decision not only affected vasectomy volume nationwide but also the typical patient seeking a vasectomy. Urologists may need to adjust practice patterns to accommodate and educate the evolving vasectomy demographic.</p>","PeriodicalId":45220,"journal":{"name":"Urology Practice","volume":" ","pages":"426-432"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urology Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000810","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Following the Dobbs decision overruling Roe v Wade, public interest in vasectomies increased. This ruling directly affected urologic practice patterns and warrants further investigation. We aimed to conduct a multi-institutional study quantifying the change in vasectomy practice volume between the pre-Dobbs (PD) and after-Dobbs (AD) eras.

Methods: Multiple geographically distinct US academic medical centers participated in the study. Patients with an initial vasectomy consult between January 1, 2021, and December 31, 2022, were included and categorized as pre-Dobbs (January 1, 2021-June 24, 2022) and after-Dobbs (June 25, 2022-December 31, 2022). Dates of subsequent vasectomy procedures and patient demographic information were compared between the 2 groups.

Results: A total of 4326 initial vasectomy consults were analyzed. Among these, 3691 had subsequent vasectomies (2742 pre-Dobbs [152 cases/mo] vs 949 AD [158 cases/mo]). Men in the AD group were more likely to be younger (median age 38 years vs 39 years, P < .001), non-Hispanic White (68% vs 64%, P = .009), English speaking (94% vs 91%, P = .005), and privately insured (92% vs 89%, P = .008). The AD group also had fewer children (median number 2 [1-2] vs 2 [2-3], P < .001) and longer median wait time between the vasectomy consult and procedure (56 days vs 52, P < .001). Married men in the AD group were more likely to be childless (11% vs 5%, P < .001), as were single men (40% vs 23%, P < .001).

Conclusions: The Dobbs decision not only affected vasectomy volume nationwide but also the typical patient seeking a vasectomy. Urologists may need to adjust practice patterns to accommodate and educate the evolving vasectomy demographic.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多布斯手术后输精管结扎手术模式的改变:一项多机构研究。
重要性:在多布斯判决推翻罗伊诉韦德案之后,公众对输精管切除术的兴趣增加了。这一裁决直接影响了泌尿外科的实践模式,值得进一步调查。目的:开展一项多机构研究,量化dobbs (PD)前和dobbs (AD)后输精管结扎量的变化。设计:多个地理位置不同的美国学术医疗中心参与了这项研究。在2021年1月1日至22年12月31日期间进行输精管切除术的患者被纳入,并被分类为术前(1/1/21 - 6/24/22)或术后(6/25/22 - 12/31/22)。比较两组患者后续输精管结扎手术日期和患者人口统计信息。结果:共分析了4326例输精管结扎术患者。其中3691例进行了输精管切除术(PD 2742例(每月152例)vs AD 949例(每月158例))。AD组的男性更可能是年轻的(中位年龄38岁vs. 39岁)。结论:Dobbs的决定不仅影响了全国输精管切除术的数量,也影响了寻求输精管切除术的典型患者。泌尿科医生可能需要调整实践模式,以适应并教育不断发展的输精管结扎人口统计学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Urology Practice
Urology Practice UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
12.50%
发文量
163
期刊最新文献
Editorial Commentary. Reply by Authors. Editorial Comment. Editorial Commentary. Editorial Commentary.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1