Ankle range of motion following surgical correction of early relapse in clubfoot.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics-Part B Pub Date : 2025-03-12 DOI:10.1097/BPB.0000000000001249
David E Westberry, Emily R Shull, Daphne Lew, Prabhav Saraswat, Emily Waters, Lauren C Hyer
{"title":"Ankle range of motion following surgical correction of early relapse in clubfoot.","authors":"David E Westberry, Emily R Shull, Daphne Lew, Prabhav Saraswat, Emily Waters, Lauren C Hyer","doi":"10.1097/BPB.0000000000001249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Surgical options for relapsed clubfoot include repeat heel cord lengthening or posterior release for recurrent equinus, and anterior tibialis tendon transfer (ATT) for residual dynamic supination deformity. Some studies have suggested that these procedures be performed in isolation to allow for early range of motion after intra-articular surgery. This study was performed to examine clinical and radiographic outcomes comparing two surgical methods, simultaneous ATT with posterior release (ATT/PR) vs ATT performed in isolation (ATT(i)), for the management of recurrent clubfoot deformity. Patients who underwent ATT(i) and ATT/PR for relapsed clubfoot deformity after initial Ponseti casting, were 2-20 years old at time of surgery, and had postoperative range of motion (ROM) data, pedobarographic data, and radiographic results with minimal follow-up of 1 year were included. A total of 49 patients (69 feet) were reviewed. Mean age at time of surgery was 4.4 (SD 1.73) years. Of the 69 feet, 27 received ATT(i) and 42 received ATT/PR. No difference in the ROM outcome of ankle dorsiflexion was found between ATT(i) vs ATT/PR at a mean of 5.8 years follow-up. In patients undergoing ATT(i), there was a mild increase in lateral loading of the foot compared to those feet having ATT/PR. Follow up radiographic results for both groups were in the normal range, with less residual radiographic equinus in the ATT/PR group. ATT(i) or ATT performed along with intra-articular posterior capsular release offers comparable short-term outcomes. Level of evidence. This study was a retrospective case series, Level IV.</p>","PeriodicalId":50092,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics-Part B","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics-Part B","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BPB.0000000000001249","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Surgical options for relapsed clubfoot include repeat heel cord lengthening or posterior release for recurrent equinus, and anterior tibialis tendon transfer (ATT) for residual dynamic supination deformity. Some studies have suggested that these procedures be performed in isolation to allow for early range of motion after intra-articular surgery. This study was performed to examine clinical and radiographic outcomes comparing two surgical methods, simultaneous ATT with posterior release (ATT/PR) vs ATT performed in isolation (ATT(i)), for the management of recurrent clubfoot deformity. Patients who underwent ATT(i) and ATT/PR for relapsed clubfoot deformity after initial Ponseti casting, were 2-20 years old at time of surgery, and had postoperative range of motion (ROM) data, pedobarographic data, and radiographic results with minimal follow-up of 1 year were included. A total of 49 patients (69 feet) were reviewed. Mean age at time of surgery was 4.4 (SD 1.73) years. Of the 69 feet, 27 received ATT(i) and 42 received ATT/PR. No difference in the ROM outcome of ankle dorsiflexion was found between ATT(i) vs ATT/PR at a mean of 5.8 years follow-up. In patients undergoing ATT(i), there was a mild increase in lateral loading of the foot compared to those feet having ATT/PR. Follow up radiographic results for both groups were in the normal range, with less residual radiographic equinus in the ATT/PR group. ATT(i) or ATT performed along with intra-articular posterior capsular release offers comparable short-term outcomes. Level of evidence. This study was a retrospective case series, Level IV.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
9.10%
发文量
170
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal highlights important recent developments from the world''s leading clinical and research institutions. The journal publishes peer-reviewed papers on the diagnosis and treatment of pediatric orthopedic disorders. It is the official journal of IFPOS (International Federation of Paediatric Orthopaedic Societies). Submitted articles undergo a preliminary review by the editor. Some articles may be returned to authors without further consideration. Those being considered for publication will undergo further assessment and peer-review by the editors and those invited to do so from a reviewer pool. ​
期刊最新文献
The use of proximal fragment transverse Kirschner wire as a joystick to correct rotational displacement in Gartland type III pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures: a novel technique. Ankle range of motion following surgical correction of early relapse in clubfoot. A nationwide survey on the information preferences of parents of children with developmental dysplasia of the hip compared with pediatric orthopedic surgeons' perspectives. Dispelling the Dogma: upper-instrumented vertebrae of T5-T6 can achieve similar correction and shoulder balance with less blood loss than T2-T4 in select patients. Outcomes from the urgent assessment pathway in selective ultrasonographic screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1