Attitudes and Perceptions of eHealth Among Female Patients with Urinary Incontinence and Healthcare Providers: A Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis.
{"title":"Attitudes and Perceptions of eHealth Among Female Patients with Urinary Incontinence and Healthcare Providers: A Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis.","authors":"Linlin Zhao, Na Li, Lianqi Gu, Chen Shen, Rao Wang, Xin Yang, Zhiping Chu","doi":"10.2147/RMHP.S496997","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The objective of this systematic review was to synthesize qualitative evidence to explore the promoters and barriers to implementing eHealth interventions from the perspective of female patients with urinary incontinence and healthcare providers.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Guiding patients to pelvic floor muscle training through eHealth can effectively improve urinary incontinence symptoms, and understanding the attitudes and perceptions of patients and healthcare providers is critical to the successful application of eHealth. However, systematic reviews that combine both views are lacking.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A systematic review of qualitative research and thematic synthesis. This was reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines 2020.</p><p><strong>Date sources: </strong>The search period was from the establishment of the database to May 2024, and eligible English literature was searched in PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and MEDLINE databases.</p><p><strong>Review methods: </strong>Two researchers independently screened and included the literature and used the Critical Appraisal Skills Program tool (CASP) to evaluate the methodological quality of the included literature. Themes were developed using thematic synthesis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of nine studies were included, which included 678 patients and 13 healthcare providers. Four themes were condensed into ten categories: multiple motivations for eHealth use, diverse reasons for taking action, complex reasons for preventing action, and conflict in establishing eHealth use behaviors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The majority of patients are enthusiastic about utilizing eHealth to train their pelvic floor muscles, although there are occasionally issues like low desire. Although some medical practitioners are not well versed in eHealth, their engagement can aid patients in making use of eHealth. The future should focus on the difficulties and needs of women with urinary incontinence during the use of eHealth exercise and improve the understanding of eHealth among healthcare personnel.</p>","PeriodicalId":56009,"journal":{"name":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","volume":"18 ","pages":"785-800"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11894429/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S496997","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim: The objective of this systematic review was to synthesize qualitative evidence to explore the promoters and barriers to implementing eHealth interventions from the perspective of female patients with urinary incontinence and healthcare providers.
Background: Guiding patients to pelvic floor muscle training through eHealth can effectively improve urinary incontinence symptoms, and understanding the attitudes and perceptions of patients and healthcare providers is critical to the successful application of eHealth. However, systematic reviews that combine both views are lacking.
Design: A systematic review of qualitative research and thematic synthesis. This was reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines 2020.
Date sources: The search period was from the establishment of the database to May 2024, and eligible English literature was searched in PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and MEDLINE databases.
Review methods: Two researchers independently screened and included the literature and used the Critical Appraisal Skills Program tool (CASP) to evaluate the methodological quality of the included literature. Themes were developed using thematic synthesis.
Results: A total of nine studies were included, which included 678 patients and 13 healthcare providers. Four themes were condensed into ten categories: multiple motivations for eHealth use, diverse reasons for taking action, complex reasons for preventing action, and conflict in establishing eHealth use behaviors.
Conclusion: The majority of patients are enthusiastic about utilizing eHealth to train their pelvic floor muscles, although there are occasionally issues like low desire. Although some medical practitioners are not well versed in eHealth, their engagement can aid patients in making use of eHealth. The future should focus on the difficulties and needs of women with urinary incontinence during the use of eHealth exercise and improve the understanding of eHealth among healthcare personnel.
期刊介绍:
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on all aspects of public health, policy and preventative measures to promote good health and improve morbidity and mortality in the population. Specific topics covered in the journal include:
Public and community health
Policy and law
Preventative and predictive healthcare
Risk and hazard management
Epidemiology, detection and screening
Lifestyle and diet modification
Vaccination and disease transmission/modification programs
Health and safety and occupational health
Healthcare services provision
Health literacy and education
Advertising and promotion of health issues
Health economic evaluations and resource management
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy focuses on human interventional and observational research. The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, clinical and epidemiological studies, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, and extended reports. Case reports will only be considered if they make a valuable and original contribution to the literature. The journal does not accept study protocols, animal-based or cell line-based studies.