Blind protocol identification using synthetic dataset: A case study on geographic protocols

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Forensic Science International-Digital Investigation Pub Date : 2025-03-13 DOI:10.1016/j.fsidi.2025.301911
Mohammad Abbasi-Azar , Mehdi Teimouri , Mohsen Nikray
{"title":"Blind protocol identification using synthetic dataset: A case study on geographic protocols","authors":"Mohammad Abbasi-Azar ,&nbsp;Mehdi Teimouri ,&nbsp;Mohsen Nikray","doi":"10.1016/j.fsidi.2025.301911","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Network forensics faces major challenges, including increasingly sophisticated cyberattacks and the difficulty of obtaining labeled datasets for training AI-driven security tools. Blind Protocol Identification (BPI), essential for detecting covert data transfers, is particularly impacted by these data limitations. This paper introduces a novel and inherently scalable method for generating synthetic datasets tailored for BPI in network forensics. Our approach emphasizes feature engineering and a statistical-analytical model of feature distributions to address the scarcity and imbalance of labeled data. We demonstrate the effectiveness of this method through a case study on geographic protocols, where we train Random Forest models using only synthetic datasets and evaluate their performance on real-world traffic. This work presents a promising solution to the data challenges in BPI, enabling reliable protocol identification while maintaining data privacy and overcoming traditional data collection limitations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48481,"journal":{"name":"Forensic Science International-Digital Investigation","volume":"53 ","pages":"Article 301911"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forensic Science International-Digital Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666281725000502","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Network forensics faces major challenges, including increasingly sophisticated cyberattacks and the difficulty of obtaining labeled datasets for training AI-driven security tools. Blind Protocol Identification (BPI), essential for detecting covert data transfers, is particularly impacted by these data limitations. This paper introduces a novel and inherently scalable method for generating synthetic datasets tailored for BPI in network forensics. Our approach emphasizes feature engineering and a statistical-analytical model of feature distributions to address the scarcity and imbalance of labeled data. We demonstrate the effectiveness of this method through a case study on geographic protocols, where we train Random Forest models using only synthetic datasets and evaluate their performance on real-world traffic. This work presents a promising solution to the data challenges in BPI, enabling reliable protocol identification while maintaining data privacy and overcoming traditional data collection limitations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
15.00%
发文量
87
审稿时长
76 days
期刊最新文献
Blind protocol identification using synthetic dataset: A case study on geographic protocols A review study of digital forensics in IoT: Process models, phases, architectures, and ontologies Corrigendum to “Adding transparency to uncertainty: An argument-based method for evaluative opinions” [FSIDI 48 (2023) 301657] Editorial Board More on digital evidence exceptionalism: Critique of the argument-based method for evaluative opinions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1