Fractal Analysis of VLF Electric Field Changes Observed at Mathura in Relation to Moderate Shallow Earthquakes (M = 4.9–5.6, depth < 17 Km) Happened in India and Around

IF 0.7 4区 地球科学 Q4 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS Geomagnetism and Aeronomy Pub Date : 2025-01-09 DOI:10.1134/S0016793224601005
Raj Pal Singh, Sarita Sharma, Devbrat Pundhir
{"title":"Fractal Analysis of VLF Electric Field Changes Observed at Mathura in Relation to Moderate Shallow Earthquakes (M = 4.9–5.6, depth < 17 Km) Happened in India and Around","authors":"Raj Pal Singh,&nbsp;Sarita Sharma,&nbsp;Devbrat Pundhir","doi":"10.1134/S0016793224601005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Fractal analysis of VLF electric field data obtained by using vertical antenna located at Chaumuhan, Mathura station (Lat., 27.5° N, Long., 72.68° E) has been carried out using Higuchi method for investigating the impact of moderate shallow earthquakes (M = 4.9–5.6, depth 4.44–16.7 Km) that occurred during February 1, 2016 to October 31, 2016 (excluding April 2016) on the fractal dimension of VLF data. The results of the analysis show that daily values of fractal dimension vary much above and below the monthly mean during the period of observations, 1–30 days before and 1–30 days after the onset of the quakes considered in the present study. The ranges of reductions and enhancements in fractal dimension from the monthly mean are 0.05–0.33 and 0.054–0.43 respectively while the percentage ranges of reductions and enhancements in its daily variation are 3.0–23.21 and 2.81–19.88% respectively. The observed variations in fractal dimension have also been studied in the light of other expected sources like, magnetic storms, lightning activity, local building noises, and instrumental errors which may affect the fractal dimension of the VLF data. It is noticed that the observed variations of fractal dimensions do not correspond to these spurious sources considered. Further, model describing the genesis of VLF emissions in preparatory zones of the impending seismic events and their mechanism of transmission to the observing station have also been discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":55597,"journal":{"name":"Geomagnetism and Aeronomy","volume":"64 1 supplement","pages":"S24 - S38"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geomagnetism and Aeronomy","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S0016793224601005","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fractal analysis of VLF electric field data obtained by using vertical antenna located at Chaumuhan, Mathura station (Lat., 27.5° N, Long., 72.68° E) has been carried out using Higuchi method for investigating the impact of moderate shallow earthquakes (M = 4.9–5.6, depth 4.44–16.7 Km) that occurred during February 1, 2016 to October 31, 2016 (excluding April 2016) on the fractal dimension of VLF data. The results of the analysis show that daily values of fractal dimension vary much above and below the monthly mean during the period of observations, 1–30 days before and 1–30 days after the onset of the quakes considered in the present study. The ranges of reductions and enhancements in fractal dimension from the monthly mean are 0.05–0.33 and 0.054–0.43 respectively while the percentage ranges of reductions and enhancements in its daily variation are 3.0–23.21 and 2.81–19.88% respectively. The observed variations in fractal dimension have also been studied in the light of other expected sources like, magnetic storms, lightning activity, local building noises, and instrumental errors which may affect the fractal dimension of the VLF data. It is noticed that the observed variations of fractal dimensions do not correspond to these spurious sources considered. Further, model describing the genesis of VLF emissions in preparatory zones of the impending seismic events and their mechanism of transmission to the observing station have also been discussed.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度及周边地区中浅地震(M = 4.9 ~ 5.6,深度< 17 Km)对马图拉VLF电场变化的分形分析
马图拉Chaumuhan站垂直天线VLF电场数据的分形分析。, 27.5°N,长利用Higuchi方法研究了2016年2月1日至2016年10月31日(不含2016年4月)发生的中浅地震(M = 4.9 ~ 5.6,深度4.44 ~ 16.7 Km)对VLF数据分形维数的影响。分析结果表明,在地震发生前1 ~ 30天和地震发生后1 ~ 30天,分形维数的日值在月平均值上下变化很大。分形维数与月平均值相比降低和增强的幅度分别为0.05 ~ 0.33和0.054 ~ 0.43,日变化的百分比分别为3.0 ~ 23.21和2.81 ~ 19.88%。在其他可能影响VLF数据分形维数的因素如磁暴、闪电活动、局部建筑噪声和仪器误差的影响下,对观测到的分形维数变化也进行了研究。值得注意的是,观察到的分形维数的变化与所考虑的这些伪源并不相符。此外,本文还讨论了即将发生的地震事件预备区VLF辐射的成因模型及其向观测站传输的机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Geomagnetism and Aeronomy
Geomagnetism and Aeronomy Earth and Planetary Sciences-Space and Planetary Science
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
33.30%
发文量
65
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Geomagnetism and Aeronomy is a bimonthly periodical that covers the fields of interplanetary space; geoeffective solar events; the magnetosphere; the ionosphere; the upper and middle atmosphere; the action of solar variability and activity on atmospheric parameters and climate; the main magnetic field and its secular variations, excursion, and inversion; and other related topics.
期刊最新文献
Total Electron Content Variability in Response to Solar Flares and a Geomagnetic Storm Over East Africa during May 8–15, 2024 Ionospheric Responses in the Low-Latitude Region of Africa during the Geomagnetic Storm of 27 August 2021 Ionospheric GPS-TEC Response to the X-Class Solar Flares during the Descending Phase of the Solar Cycle 24 Ionospheric Storm Effects during the 5–6 November 2023 Geomagnetic Storm Over South Africa Comparative Assessment of Solar and Geophysical Parameters during the Initial Six Years of Solar Cycles 24 and 25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1