Comparing Analgesic Efficacy: Ropivacaine with Dexamethasone vs. Ropivacaine with Dexmedetomidine After Cesarean Section Using Transversus Abdominis Plane Block (2020 - 2021).

Q2 Medicine Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-18 eCollection Date: 2024-10-01 DOI:10.5812/aapm-147872
Mohammadreza Jamshidi, Mona Ghaderi, Mitra Hojatansari
{"title":"Comparing Analgesic Efficacy: Ropivacaine with Dexamethasone vs. Ropivacaine with Dexmedetomidine After Cesarean Section Using Transversus Abdominis Plane Block (2020 - 2021).","authors":"Mohammadreza Jamshidi, Mona Ghaderi, Mitra Hojatansari","doi":"10.5812/aapm-147872","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There are several methods for managing postpartum pain. The combined use of drugs with anesthetics can lead to effective pain management.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The present study aimed to compare the analgesic effects of ropivacaine (RPV) + dexamethasone (DEXA) and RPV + dexmedetomidine (DEX) on pain after cesarean section (CS) using the transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This double-blind, randomized clinical trial employed a quadruple block randomization method and included 40 participants scheduled for CS at Ayatollah Mousavi Hospital in Zanjan, Iran, during 2020 - 2021. The participants were divided into two groups: The first group received 15 mL of RPV 2% combined with 100 µg of DEX via the bilateral TAP block method, while the second group received 15 ml of RPV 2% combined with 8 mg of DEXA. The analgesic effects of the two drug combinations were evaluated at 0, 3-, 6-, 12-, and 24-hours post-CS using the visual analog scale (VAS) to measure pain intensity. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS software, version 24.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the RPV + DEX group, the onset of pain was delayed, resulting in a longer duration before the administration of painkillers (P = 0.041 and P < 0.001). However, pain intensity between 3- and 24-hours post-surgery was significantly higher in the RPV + DEX group compared to the RPV + DEXA group (P = 0.028, P < 0.001). The RPV + DEX group experienced longer durations before the onset of pain and the need for painkillers (P = 0.041, P < 0.001). Hypotension was more frequently observed in the RPV + DEXA group at 0 hours (P = 0.068) and 3 hours post-surgery (P = 0.003). Additionally, bradycardia and sedation incidences were higher in the RPV + DEXA group at 3 hours post-surgery (P = 0.005, P = 0.048).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of RPV + DEXA, unlike RPV + DEX, demonstrated positive and significant effects on pain management in female CS candidates using the TAP block method, despite its side effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":7841,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine","volume":"14 5","pages":"e147872"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11895784/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm-147872","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There are several methods for managing postpartum pain. The combined use of drugs with anesthetics can lead to effective pain management.

Objectives: The present study aimed to compare the analgesic effects of ropivacaine (RPV) + dexamethasone (DEXA) and RPV + dexmedetomidine (DEX) on pain after cesarean section (CS) using the transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block.

Methods: This double-blind, randomized clinical trial employed a quadruple block randomization method and included 40 participants scheduled for CS at Ayatollah Mousavi Hospital in Zanjan, Iran, during 2020 - 2021. The participants were divided into two groups: The first group received 15 mL of RPV 2% combined with 100 µg of DEX via the bilateral TAP block method, while the second group received 15 ml of RPV 2% combined with 8 mg of DEXA. The analgesic effects of the two drug combinations were evaluated at 0, 3-, 6-, 12-, and 24-hours post-CS using the visual analog scale (VAS) to measure pain intensity. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS software, version 24.

Results: In the RPV + DEX group, the onset of pain was delayed, resulting in a longer duration before the administration of painkillers (P = 0.041 and P < 0.001). However, pain intensity between 3- and 24-hours post-surgery was significantly higher in the RPV + DEX group compared to the RPV + DEXA group (P = 0.028, P < 0.001). The RPV + DEX group experienced longer durations before the onset of pain and the need for painkillers (P = 0.041, P < 0.001). Hypotension was more frequently observed in the RPV + DEXA group at 0 hours (P = 0.068) and 3 hours post-surgery (P = 0.003). Additionally, bradycardia and sedation incidences were higher in the RPV + DEXA group at 3 hours post-surgery (P = 0.005, P = 0.048).

Conclusions: The use of RPV + DEXA, unlike RPV + DEX, demonstrated positive and significant effects on pain management in female CS candidates using the TAP block method, despite its side effects.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
罗哌卡因联合地塞米松与罗哌卡因联合右美托咪定剖宫产术后镇痛效果比较(2020 - 2021)。
背景:治疗产后疼痛有几种方法。药物与麻醉剂的联合使用可以有效地控制疼痛。目的:比较罗哌卡因(RPV) +地塞米松(DEXA)与罗哌卡因(RPV) +右美托咪定(DEX)对剖宫产(CS)术后经腹平面(TAP)阻滞的镇痛效果。方法:这项双盲、随机临床试验采用四组随机方法,纳入40名参与者,计划于2020 - 2021年在伊朗赞詹的阿亚图拉穆萨维医院接受CS治疗。参与者被分为两组:第一组通过双侧TAP阻断法接受15 mL RPV 2%联合100µg DEX,第二组接受15 mL RPV 2%联合8 mg DEXA。在cs后0、3、6、12、24小时采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)测量疼痛强度,评价两种药物联合使用的镇痛效果。数据分析使用SPSS软件,版本24。结果:RPV + DEX组疼痛发作延迟,用药时间延长(P = 0.041, P < 0.001)。然而,RPV + DEX组术后3 ~ 24小时疼痛强度明显高于RPV + DEXA组(P = 0.028, P < 0.001)。RPV + DEX组疼痛发作前持续时间更长,需要止痛药(P = 0.041, P < 0.001)。RPV + DEXA组在术后0小时(P = 0.068)和3小时(P = 0.003)出现低血压的频率更高。此外,RPV + DEXA组在术后3小时的心动过缓和镇静发生率较高(P = 0.005, P = 0.048)。结论:RPV + DEXA的使用,与RPV + DEX不同,对使用TAP阻滞方法的女性CS候选人的疼痛管理显示出积极和显著的效果,尽管其副作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Postoperative Pain Management Between Saphenous Nerve Block and High-Volume Proximal Adductor Canal Block for Arthroscopic Knee Surgery. Analysis of the Effects of Various Analgesia Methods on Post-cesarean Pain and Their Correlation with Inflammatory Biomarkers. Comparison of Lidocaine and Dexmedetomidine in Preventing Fentanyl-induced Cough in Patients Undergoing Elective Surgery: A Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial. Comparison of the Sedative, Recovery, and Analgesic Effects of Oral Dexmedetomidine, Ketamine, and Midazolam for Premedication in Children Undergoing Inguinal Hernia Surgery: A Randomized Double-Blind Study. Prophylactic Role of Ketamine and Dexmedetomidine on the Prevention of Shivering in Patients Undergoing Inguinal Herniorrhaphy by Spinal Anesthesia: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1