Evaluation of functional and aesthetic outcomes following open technique septorhinoplasty: assessing the utility and correlation of the Rhinoplasty Health Inventory and Nasal Outcomes, Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation, and Nasal Obstructive Symptom Evaluation questionnaires.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Acta Oto-Laryngologica Pub Date : 2025-03-13 DOI:10.1080/00016489.2025.2477210
Gamze Ozturk Yilmaz, Gokhan Yilmaz
{"title":"Evaluation of functional and aesthetic outcomes following open technique septorhinoplasty: assessing the utility and correlation of the Rhinoplasty Health Inventory and Nasal Outcomes, Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation, and Nasal Obstructive Symptom Evaluation questionnaires.","authors":"Gamze Ozturk Yilmaz, Gokhan Yilmaz","doi":"10.1080/00016489.2025.2477210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The importance of subjective quality of life questionnaires in evaluating post-rhinoplasty outcomes and patient satisfaction is increasing.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to measure the aesthetic and functional satisfaction of patients following septorhinoplasty using the Rhinoplasty Health Inventory and Nasal Outcomes (RHINO), Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation (ROE), and Nasal Obstructive Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) questionnaires.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective study included 306 patients who underwent a primary open-technique septorhinoplasty. The NOSE, ROE, and RHINO questionnaires were given to all patients before surgery and in the sixth month following surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Preoperative NOSE, ROE, and RHINO scores significantly improved postoperatively in all patients (<i>p</i> < .001). Postoperative satisfaction was higher among young people, women, those with functional indications, single people, and those who were unemployed. Additionally, positive correlation existed between the RHINO and ROE scores (<i>p</i> < .001), and negative correlation existed between the postoperative RHINO and NOSE scores (<i>p</i> < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Thus, septorhinoplasty likely improves the functional and aesthetic quality of life in all patients. Our results suggest that a patient who scores favorable on the NOSE and ROE questionnaires is also likely to score favorable on the RHINO questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>It is possible to evaluate septorhinoplasty results both functionally and aesthetically using just one questionnaire.</p>","PeriodicalId":6880,"journal":{"name":"Acta Oto-Laryngologica","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Oto-Laryngologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00016489.2025.2477210","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The importance of subjective quality of life questionnaires in evaluating post-rhinoplasty outcomes and patient satisfaction is increasing.

Objective: This study aimed to measure the aesthetic and functional satisfaction of patients following septorhinoplasty using the Rhinoplasty Health Inventory and Nasal Outcomes (RHINO), Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation (ROE), and Nasal Obstructive Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) questionnaires.

Methods: This prospective study included 306 patients who underwent a primary open-technique septorhinoplasty. The NOSE, ROE, and RHINO questionnaires were given to all patients before surgery and in the sixth month following surgery.

Results: Preoperative NOSE, ROE, and RHINO scores significantly improved postoperatively in all patients (p < .001). Postoperative satisfaction was higher among young people, women, those with functional indications, single people, and those who were unemployed. Additionally, positive correlation existed between the RHINO and ROE scores (p < .001), and negative correlation existed between the postoperative RHINO and NOSE scores (p < .001).

Conclusions: Thus, septorhinoplasty likely improves the functional and aesthetic quality of life in all patients. Our results suggest that a patient who scores favorable on the NOSE and ROE questionnaires is also likely to score favorable on the RHINO questionnaire.

Significance: It is possible to evaluate septorhinoplasty results both functionally and aesthetically using just one questionnaire.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Oto-Laryngologica
Acta Oto-Laryngologica 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Oto-Laryngologica is a truly international journal for translational otolaryngology and head- and neck surgery. The journal presents cutting-edge papers on clinical practice, clinical research and basic sciences. Acta also bridges the gap between clinical and basic research.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of functional and aesthetic outcomes following open technique septorhinoplasty: assessing the utility and correlation of the Rhinoplasty Health Inventory and Nasal Outcomes, Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation, and Nasal Obstructive Symptom Evaluation questionnaires. Postoperative outcome of palatine tonsillectomy by tonsil pillar suture with knot-free suture. Evaluation of nasal functions in Behçet's and neuro-Behçet's patients. Effect of basic-fibroblast growth factor on tympanic membrane perforation in a mouse model of blast injury. Correlation of polysomnography data and inflammatory markers after sleep surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1