Frederik T. W. Groenland, Annemieke C. Ziedses des Plantes, Tara Neleman, Alessandra Scoccia, Jari A. van der Eijk, Kaneshka Masdjedi, Laurens J. C. van Zandvoort, Wijnand K. den Dekker, Jeroen M. Wilschut, Isabella Kardys, Paul Cummins, Roberto Diletti, Nicolas M. Van Mieghem, Joost Daemen
{"title":"Impact of Post Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Fractional Flow Reserve on 5-Year Clinical Outcomes (The FFR SEARCH Study)","authors":"Frederik T. W. Groenland, Annemieke C. Ziedses des Plantes, Tara Neleman, Alessandra Scoccia, Jari A. van der Eijk, Kaneshka Masdjedi, Laurens J. C. van Zandvoort, Wijnand K. den Dekker, Jeroen M. Wilschut, Isabella Kardys, Paul Cummins, Roberto Diletti, Nicolas M. Van Mieghem, Joost Daemen","doi":"10.1002/ccd.31493","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Fractional flow reserve (FFR) following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) can be used to evaluate procedural success and to guide stent optimization. Several studies have demonstrated that lower FFR after stent implantation is associated with increased adverse event rates up to 2 years. However, the impact of post-PCI FFR on very long-term clinical outcome remains unknown.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The FFR SEARCH study is a single-center, prospective, observational study including consecutive patients undergoing PCI with stent implantation from 2016 to 2017. FFR measurement was performed after angiographically successful PCI using a dedicated microcatheter. The primary endpoint was target vessel failure (TVF) at 5 years, a composite of cardiovascular death, target vessel myocardial infarction and target vessel revascularization. The optimal post-PCI FFR cutoff value to predict 5-year TVF was determined based on the maximum log-rank statistic.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Post-PCI FFR measurements were successfully performed in 959 patients. Mean age was 64.0 ± 11.9 years, 72.5% of the patients were male and 33.6% presented with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. The left anterior descending artery was the target vessel in 53.5%. The optimal post-PCI FFR cutoff value was ≤ 0.90. TVF occurred in 18.4% of patients with a post-PCI FFR ≤ 0.90 versus 11.6% in patients with a post-PCI FFR > 0.90 (adjusted HR 1.65 (95% CI 1.11–2.48, <i>p</i> = 0.014)).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>This large prospective observational study demonstrates that post-PCI FFR ≤ 0.90 is associated with a higher TVF rate at 5 years.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":9650,"journal":{"name":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","volume":"105 6","pages":"1523-1529"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ccd.31493","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ccd.31493","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Fractional flow reserve (FFR) following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) can be used to evaluate procedural success and to guide stent optimization. Several studies have demonstrated that lower FFR after stent implantation is associated with increased adverse event rates up to 2 years. However, the impact of post-PCI FFR on very long-term clinical outcome remains unknown.
Methods
The FFR SEARCH study is a single-center, prospective, observational study including consecutive patients undergoing PCI with stent implantation from 2016 to 2017. FFR measurement was performed after angiographically successful PCI using a dedicated microcatheter. The primary endpoint was target vessel failure (TVF) at 5 years, a composite of cardiovascular death, target vessel myocardial infarction and target vessel revascularization. The optimal post-PCI FFR cutoff value to predict 5-year TVF was determined based on the maximum log-rank statistic.
Results
Post-PCI FFR measurements were successfully performed in 959 patients. Mean age was 64.0 ± 11.9 years, 72.5% of the patients were male and 33.6% presented with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. The left anterior descending artery was the target vessel in 53.5%. The optimal post-PCI FFR cutoff value was ≤ 0.90. TVF occurred in 18.4% of patients with a post-PCI FFR ≤ 0.90 versus 11.6% in patients with a post-PCI FFR > 0.90 (adjusted HR 1.65 (95% CI 1.11–2.48, p = 0.014)).
Conclusions
This large prospective observational study demonstrates that post-PCI FFR ≤ 0.90 is associated with a higher TVF rate at 5 years.
背景:经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后的血流储备分数(FFR)可用于评估手术成功率并指导支架优化。几项研究表明,支架植入后较低的FFR与2年内不良事件发生率增加相关。然而,pci后FFR对长期临床结果的影响尚不清楚。方法:FFR SEARCH研究是一项单中心、前瞻性、观察性研究,包括2016年至2017年连续接受PCI支架植入术的患者。FFR测量在血管造影成功后使用专用微导管进行PCI。主要终点是5年时靶血管衰竭(TVF),包括心血管死亡、靶血管心肌梗死和靶血管重建术。根据最大对数秩统计量确定预测5年TVF的最佳pci后FFR截止值。结果:959例患者成功行pci后FFR测量。平均年龄64.0±11.9岁,男性占72.5%,以st段抬高型心肌梗死为主占33.6%。53.5%的患者以左前降支为靶血管。pci术后最佳FFR截止值≤0.90。pci后FFR≤0.90的患者发生TVF的比例为18.4%,而pci后FFR≤0.90的患者发生TVF的比例为11.6%(调整后风险比1.65 (95% CI 1.11-2.48, p = 0.014))。结论:这项大型前瞻性观察研究表明,pci后FFR≤0.90与5年较高的TVF率相关。
期刊介绍:
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions is an international journal covering the broad field of cardiovascular diseases. Subject material includes basic and clinical information that is derived from or related to invasive and interventional coronary or peripheral vascular techniques. The journal focuses on material that will be of immediate practical value to physicians providing patient care in the clinical laboratory setting. To accomplish this, the journal publishes Preliminary Reports and Work In Progress articles that complement the traditional Original Studies, Case Reports, and Comprehensive Reviews. Perspective and insight concerning controversial subjects and evolving technologies are provided regularly through Editorial Commentaries furnished by members of the Editorial Board and other experts. Articles are subject to double-blind peer review and complete editorial evaluation prior to any decision regarding acceptability.