A Rapid and Reliable Test for BRCA1 Promoter Hypermethylation in Paraffin Tissue Using Pyrosequencing.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Diagnostics Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI:10.3390/diagnostics15050601
Ruben Bacares, Robert Soslow, Narciso Olvera, Douglas A Levine, Liying Zhang
{"title":"A Rapid and Reliable Test for <i>BRCA1</i> Promoter Hypermethylation in Paraffin Tissue Using Pyrosequencing.","authors":"Ruben Bacares, Robert Soslow, Narciso Olvera, Douglas A Levine, Liying Zhang","doi":"10.3390/diagnostics15050601","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Ovarian cancers harboring inactivating mutations in <i>BRCA1</i> or <i>BRCA2</i> demonstrate increased sensitivity to poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPis). <i>BRCA1</i> promoter methylation could serve as a more precise biomarker for therapy response, as it reflects a dynamic mechanism, compared with genomic scarring, which remains persistent and lacks real-time prediction of sensitivity after prior lines of treatment. Additionally, the <i>BRCA1</i> promoter methylation may provide a more precise biomarker for identifying homologous recombination deficiency compared to genomic scars. In this study, we describe the validation of a pyrosequencing method to assess <i>BRCA1</i> promoter methylation status. <b>Methods:</b> Tumor DNA from high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma was tested targeting 11 CpG sites adjacent to the <i>BRCA1</i> transcription start site. All cases had concordant results compared with TCGA methylation data or real-time PCR results. To determine the sensitivity of this assay, we performed a dilution series experiment using seven mixtures of methylated DNA and unmethylated genomic DNA (100%, 50%, 25%, 12.5%, 6.25%, 3.125%, and 1.56%). <b>Results:</b> We observed a high degree of correlation (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.9945) between predicted and observed results. Intra- and inter-run reproducibility was established by performing six cases in triplicate in the same run and in three different runs. <b>Conclusions:</b> By applying 10% as the cutoff for detection of methylation, the PyroMark Q24 pyrosequencing assay demonstrated 100% concordance across all the ovarian cancer cases included in this validation. This assay has been approved by the New York State Department of Health as a laboratory-specific assay for clinical use.</p>","PeriodicalId":11225,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostics","volume":"15 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11898801/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15050601","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Ovarian cancers harboring inactivating mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 demonstrate increased sensitivity to poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPis). BRCA1 promoter methylation could serve as a more precise biomarker for therapy response, as it reflects a dynamic mechanism, compared with genomic scarring, which remains persistent and lacks real-time prediction of sensitivity after prior lines of treatment. Additionally, the BRCA1 promoter methylation may provide a more precise biomarker for identifying homologous recombination deficiency compared to genomic scars. In this study, we describe the validation of a pyrosequencing method to assess BRCA1 promoter methylation status. Methods: Tumor DNA from high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma was tested targeting 11 CpG sites adjacent to the BRCA1 transcription start site. All cases had concordant results compared with TCGA methylation data or real-time PCR results. To determine the sensitivity of this assay, we performed a dilution series experiment using seven mixtures of methylated DNA and unmethylated genomic DNA (100%, 50%, 25%, 12.5%, 6.25%, 3.125%, and 1.56%). Results: We observed a high degree of correlation (R2 = 0.9945) between predicted and observed results. Intra- and inter-run reproducibility was established by performing six cases in triplicate in the same run and in three different runs. Conclusions: By applying 10% as the cutoff for detection of methylation, the PyroMark Q24 pyrosequencing assay demonstrated 100% concordance across all the ovarian cancer cases included in this validation. This assay has been approved by the New York State Department of Health as a laboratory-specific assay for clinical use.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Diagnostics
Diagnostics Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Clinical Biochemistry
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
2699
审稿时长
19.64 days
期刊介绍: Diagnostics (ISSN 2075-4418) is an international scholarly open access journal on medical diagnostics. It publishes original research articles, reviews, communications and short notes on the research and development of medical diagnostics. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible. Full experimental and/or methodological details must be provided for research articles.
期刊最新文献
The Value of Clinical Decision Support in Healthcare: A Focus on Screening and Early Detection. Pain-Related White-Matter Changes Following Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A Longitudinal Diffusion Tensor Imaging Pilot Study. Performance Comparison of Two In-House PCR Methods for Detecting Neisseria meningitidis in Asymptomatic Carriers and Antimicrobial Resistance Profiling. Fine-Tuned Machine Learning Classifiers for Diagnosing Parkinson's Disease Using Vocal Characteristics: A Comparative Analysis. Comparing ChatGPT 4.0's Performance in Interpreting Thyroid Nodule Ultrasound Reports Using ACR-TI-RADS 2017: Analysis Across Different Levels of Ultrasound User Experience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1