Accuracy of COuGH RefluX Score as a Predictor of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) in Mexican Patients with Chronic Laryngopharyngeal Symptoms: A Cross-Sectional Study.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Diagnostics Pub Date : 2025-03-06 DOI:10.3390/diagnostics15050636
Javier Ivanovychs Carrillo-Rojas, Salvador Zavala-Villegas, Guadalupe Morales-Osorio, Fausto Daniel García-García, Mauricio González-Navarro, Viridiana Montsserrat Mendoza-Martínez, Nallely Bueno-Hernández
{"title":"Accuracy of COuGH RefluX Score as a Predictor of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) in Mexican Patients with Chronic Laryngopharyngeal Symptoms: A Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Javier Ivanovychs Carrillo-Rojas, Salvador Zavala-Villegas, Guadalupe Morales-Osorio, Fausto Daniel García-García, Mauricio González-Navarro, Viridiana Montsserrat Mendoza-Martínez, Nallely Bueno-Hernández","doi":"10.3390/diagnostics15050636","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives:</b> Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is associated with extraesophageal syndromes that require an objective assessment of abnormal acid exposure to establish the diagnosis. The COuGH RefluX score has been proposed as a diagnostic tool for GERD in patients with chronic laryngopharyngeal symptoms. The aim of the study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the COuGH RefluX score in the Mexican population. <b>Methods:</b> A cross-sectional study was conducted in patients with chronic laryngopharyngeal symptoms. Patients with cough, globus, sore throat, dysphonia, and/or throat clearing of ≥8 weeks duration, 24 h pH-impedance monitoring (pH-IM), and without objective evidence of GERD (defined as acid exposure time >6%) were included in the study. The COuGH RefluX score tool was applied and stratified as low probability with ≤2.5 points, intermediate probability with 3.0 to 4.5 points, and high probability with ≥5.0 points. The kappa test assessed the concordance between both tests; the area under the curve (AUR), sensitivity (S), specificity (E), positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated for each result. <b>Results:</b> 164 patients were included; the prevalence of GERD by pH-IM was 32% vs. 40.3% by COuGH RefluX score, the agreement was weak (κ = 0.34; <i>p</i> < 0.001), but the AUR was good (0.720 ± 0.17; <i>p</i> < 0.001). A score ≤ 2.5 had S = 49%, E = 88%, PPV = 89%, and NPV = 42% to rule out proven GERD, while a score ≥ 5 had S = 65%, E = 71%, PPV = 52%, and NPV = 82% for proven GERD. <b>Conclusions:</b> The COuGH RefluX score has low sensitivity but adequate specificity for GERD diagnosis in Mexican patients with chronic laryngopharyngeal symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":11225,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostics","volume":"15 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11899231/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15050636","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is associated with extraesophageal syndromes that require an objective assessment of abnormal acid exposure to establish the diagnosis. The COuGH RefluX score has been proposed as a diagnostic tool for GERD in patients with chronic laryngopharyngeal symptoms. The aim of the study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the COuGH RefluX score in the Mexican population. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in patients with chronic laryngopharyngeal symptoms. Patients with cough, globus, sore throat, dysphonia, and/or throat clearing of ≥8 weeks duration, 24 h pH-impedance monitoring (pH-IM), and without objective evidence of GERD (defined as acid exposure time >6%) were included in the study. The COuGH RefluX score tool was applied and stratified as low probability with ≤2.5 points, intermediate probability with 3.0 to 4.5 points, and high probability with ≥5.0 points. The kappa test assessed the concordance between both tests; the area under the curve (AUR), sensitivity (S), specificity (E), positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated for each result. Results: 164 patients were included; the prevalence of GERD by pH-IM was 32% vs. 40.3% by COuGH RefluX score, the agreement was weak (κ = 0.34; p < 0.001), but the AUR was good (0.720 ± 0.17; p < 0.001). A score ≤ 2.5 had S = 49%, E = 88%, PPV = 89%, and NPV = 42% to rule out proven GERD, while a score ≥ 5 had S = 65%, E = 71%, PPV = 52%, and NPV = 82% for proven GERD. Conclusions: The COuGH RefluX score has low sensitivity but adequate specificity for GERD diagnosis in Mexican patients with chronic laryngopharyngeal symptoms.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
墨西哥慢性喉部症状患者咳嗽反流评分作为胃食管反流病(GERD)预测因子的准确性:一项横断面研究
背景/目的:胃食管反流病(GERD)与食管外综合征相关,需要对异常酸暴露进行客观评估以确定诊断。咳嗽反流评分已被提议作为慢性咽喉症状患者胃食管反流的诊断工具。本研究的目的是评估咳嗽反流评分在墨西哥人群中的诊断性能。方法:对慢性咽喉症状患者进行横断面研究。研究纳入了持续时间≥8周、24小时ph -阻抗监测(pH-IM)、无客观证据的胃食管反流(定义为酸暴露时间bbb6%)的咳嗽、球、喉咙痛、发声困难和/或清喉患者。采用咳嗽反流评分工具进行分层,分为低概率≤2.5分、中概率3.0 ~ 4.5分、高概率≥5.0分。kappa测验评估两个测验之间的一致性;计算各结果的曲线下面积(AUR)、敏感性(S)、特异性(E)、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)。结果:纳入164例患者;pH-IM组胃食管反流发生率为32%,咳嗽反流评分组为40.3%,两者一致性较弱(κ = 0.34;p < 0.001),但AUR良好(0.720±0.17;P < 0.001)。评分≤2.5分排除GERD的S = 49%, E = 88%, PPV = 89%, NPV = 42%,评分≥5分排除GERD的S = 65%, E = 71%, PPV = 52%, NPV = 82%。结论:咳嗽反流评分对墨西哥慢性喉部症状患者的GERD诊断敏感性低,但特异性足够。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Diagnostics
Diagnostics Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Clinical Biochemistry
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
2699
审稿时长
19.64 days
期刊介绍: Diagnostics (ISSN 2075-4418) is an international scholarly open access journal on medical diagnostics. It publishes original research articles, reviews, communications and short notes on the research and development of medical diagnostics. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible. Full experimental and/or methodological details must be provided for research articles.
期刊最新文献
Cephalometric Assessment of Airway-Related Hyoid Position and Velar Morphology Across Skeletal Malocclusions: A Cross-Sectional Study. Comparative Diagnostic Performance of TST and IGRAs in the Diagnosis of Latent Tuberculosis Infection: A Systematic Review and Diagnostic Meta-Analysis. Uncertainty-Aware Framework for CT Radiation Dose Optimization in the Active Surveillance of Small Renal Masses: Clinical and Radiological Considerations. Digital Specimen Tracking- and ISO 15189-Oriented Risk Management in Anatomic Pathology: A Qualitative Study of Expert Perspectives in Western Austria. Intrapartum Ultrasound in Vacuum Operative Delivery: A Comprehensive Review and Proposal of the Novel Ultrasound Flexion Point Method.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1