Mirror Therapy in Unilateral Amputee Patients With Phantom Limb Pain

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Pain Management Nursing Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-11 DOI:10.1016/j.pmn.2024.12.015
Ana M. Díaz-González MSc , Adelaida Zabalegui RN, PhD, FEANS , Luis A. Moreno-Cuartas MD , Vicente Riambau-Alonso MD, PhD
{"title":"Mirror Therapy in Unilateral Amputee Patients With Phantom Limb Pain","authors":"Ana M. Díaz-González MSc ,&nbsp;Adelaida Zabalegui RN, PhD, FEANS ,&nbsp;Luis A. Moreno-Cuartas MD ,&nbsp;Vicente Riambau-Alonso MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.pmn.2024.12.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Up to 90% of amputee patients have phantom limb pain (PLP), which is difficult to treat. The aim of this study was to assess the medium and long-term efficacy of mirror therapy (MT) in unilateral amputee adults with PLP.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We carried out an uncontrolled prospective longitudinal study. Twelve consecutive adult subjects with upper or lower limb amputation and PLP were selected. Weekly sessions of nurse-guided, in-person MT training lasting 1.5 h were implemented for six months. In parallel, self-administered home sessions were added 20 min per day, five days per week for 12 months. At baseline, and at three, six, and 12 months the following variables were analyzed: subjects’ clinical characteristics, pain intensity (visual analog scale), disability (Oswestry Disability Index), Quality of Life (QoL SF-36), impression of patient's global improvement (Patient Global Impression scale, PGI-I), and hours of MT in consultation and at home.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Statistically significant differences in mean pain intensity scores were found (<em>p</em> &lt; .001) between baseline, and measurements at three, six, and 12 months. Mean disability scores showed statistically significant improvement (<em>p</em> &lt; .001) at at three months. QoL, and mean baseline scores in Physical Function (<em>p</em> &lt; .002) and Body Pain (<em>p</em> &lt; .001) dimensions improved significantly. Patient global impression scores were statistically significant.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>These findings support the efficacy the medium and long term, of MT, in unilateral amputee adults, with PLP, through 12-month follow-up.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19959,"journal":{"name":"Pain Management Nursing","volume":"26 3","pages":"Pages e270-e277"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Management Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S152490422400328X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Up to 90% of amputee patients have phantom limb pain (PLP), which is difficult to treat. The aim of this study was to assess the medium and long-term efficacy of mirror therapy (MT) in unilateral amputee adults with PLP.

Methods

We carried out an uncontrolled prospective longitudinal study. Twelve consecutive adult subjects with upper or lower limb amputation and PLP were selected. Weekly sessions of nurse-guided, in-person MT training lasting 1.5 h were implemented for six months. In parallel, self-administered home sessions were added 20 min per day, five days per week for 12 months. At baseline, and at three, six, and 12 months the following variables were analyzed: subjects’ clinical characteristics, pain intensity (visual analog scale), disability (Oswestry Disability Index), Quality of Life (QoL SF-36), impression of patient's global improvement (Patient Global Impression scale, PGI-I), and hours of MT in consultation and at home.

Results

Statistically significant differences in mean pain intensity scores were found (p < .001) between baseline, and measurements at three, six, and 12 months. Mean disability scores showed statistically significant improvement (p < .001) at at three months. QoL, and mean baseline scores in Physical Function (p < .002) and Body Pain (p < .001) dimensions improved significantly. Patient global impression scores were statistically significant.

Conclusions

These findings support the efficacy the medium and long term, of MT, in unilateral amputee adults, with PLP, through 12-month follow-up.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
单侧截肢患者幻肢痛的镜像治疗。
高达90%的截肢患者患有幻肢痛(PLP),这是一种难以治疗的疾病。本研究的目的是评估镜像疗法(MT)对患有PLP的单侧截肢成人的中期和长期疗效。方法:我们进行了一项无对照的前瞻性纵向研究。选择连续12例上肢或下肢截肢和PLP的成人受试者。每周在护士指导下进行1.5小时的现场MT培训,持续6个月。与此同时,自我管理的家庭课程每天增加20分钟,每周5天,持续12个月。在基线、3个月、6个月和12个月时分析以下变量:受试者的临床特征、疼痛强度(视觉模拟量表)、残疾(Oswestry残疾指数)、生活质量(QoL SF-36)、患者总体改善的印象(患者总体印象量表,PGI-I)以及咨询和在家MT的时间。结果:在基线、3个月、6个月和12个月的测量中,平均疼痛强度评分有统计学意义差异(p < 0.001)。3个月时平均残疾评分有显著改善(p < 0.001)。生活质量、身体功能(p < 0.001)和身体疼痛(p < 0.001)维度的平均基线评分均有显著改善。患者整体印象评分具有统计学意义。结论:通过12个月的随访,这些发现支持MT对患有PLP的单侧截肢成人的中期和长期疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pain Management Nursing
Pain Management Nursing 医学-护理
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
187
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: This peer-reviewed journal offers a unique focus on the realm of pain management as it applies to nursing. Original and review articles from experts in the field offer key insights in the areas of clinical practice, advocacy, education, administration, and research. Additional features include practice guidelines and pharmacology updates.
期刊最新文献
Editorial board Table of contents Neuropathic Pain Experience and Self-Management Strategies of Spinal Cord Injury Patients: A Meta-Synthesis of Qualitative Studies Managing Allodynia in Complex Regional Pain Syndrome: An Integrated Rehabilitation Approach A Randomized Trial of Cervical Stabilization Exercise Training Via Telerehabilitation for Migraine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1