A Comparative Analysis of Scoring Systems and MRI for Diagnosing Acute Appendicitis in Pregnant Patients.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY World Journal of Surgery Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-12 DOI:10.1002/wjs.12556
Eliahu Y Bekhor, Olga Esepkina, Tal Livne, Ubaida Hawashna, Hila Shmilovich, Noam Peleg, Adva Abergel, Shlomit Tamir, Ory Wiesel
{"title":"A Comparative Analysis of Scoring Systems and MRI for Diagnosing Acute Appendicitis in Pregnant Patients.","authors":"Eliahu Y Bekhor, Olga Esepkina, Tal Livne, Ubaida Hawashna, Hila Shmilovich, Noam Peleg, Adva Abergel, Shlomit Tamir, Ory Wiesel","doi":"10.1002/wjs.12556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Acute appendicitis (AA) represents the most prevalent indication for general surgical intervention during pregnancy. Despite the development of scoring systems for AA diagnosis, their validation in pregnant patient remains incomplete. Given the growing utilization of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), evaluating the accuracy of both scoring systems and MRI in diagnosing AA during pregnancy becomes essential.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified pregnant patients who underwent MRI for suspected AA between 2013 and 2023. Patients were categorized into AA and control groups based on established other diagnoses or spontaneous resolution of their symptoms. A national database was used to ensure patients who did not seek further medical attention. The Alvarado, Tzanakis, RIPASA, AIR scoring systems, and MRI findings were compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>180 pregnant patients underwent MRI for suspected AA and 28 were diagnosed with AA upon pathology examination. Most patients in the AA group exhibited negative clinical scores (Alvarado 82%, Tzanakis 84%, RIPASA 68%, and AIR 43%). MRI was positive in 79%. Demographic characteristics and clinical presentations were similar between the AA and control groups. The positive predictive values (PPVs) of clinical scores were modest (Alvarado-38%, Tzanakis-57%, RIPASA-22%, and AIR-12%), whereas the negative predictive values (NPVs) were high (80%-86%) across all scoring systems. MRI demonstrated a PPV of 62% and an NPV of 96%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite significant clinical and radiological advancements, diagnosing AA in pregnant patient remains challenging. The discrepancy between clinical scores and MRI finding underscores the complexity of AA diagnosis during pregnancy.</p>","PeriodicalId":23926,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"1193-1199"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.12556","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Acute appendicitis (AA) represents the most prevalent indication for general surgical intervention during pregnancy. Despite the development of scoring systems for AA diagnosis, their validation in pregnant patient remains incomplete. Given the growing utilization of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), evaluating the accuracy of both scoring systems and MRI in diagnosing AA during pregnancy becomes essential.

Methods: We identified pregnant patients who underwent MRI for suspected AA between 2013 and 2023. Patients were categorized into AA and control groups based on established other diagnoses or spontaneous resolution of their symptoms. A national database was used to ensure patients who did not seek further medical attention. The Alvarado, Tzanakis, RIPASA, AIR scoring systems, and MRI findings were compared between the two groups.

Results: 180 pregnant patients underwent MRI for suspected AA and 28 were diagnosed with AA upon pathology examination. Most patients in the AA group exhibited negative clinical scores (Alvarado 82%, Tzanakis 84%, RIPASA 68%, and AIR 43%). MRI was positive in 79%. Demographic characteristics and clinical presentations were similar between the AA and control groups. The positive predictive values (PPVs) of clinical scores were modest (Alvarado-38%, Tzanakis-57%, RIPASA-22%, and AIR-12%), whereas the negative predictive values (NPVs) were high (80%-86%) across all scoring systems. MRI demonstrated a PPV of 62% and an NPV of 96%.

Conclusion: Despite significant clinical and radiological advancements, diagnosing AA in pregnant patient remains challenging. The discrepancy between clinical scores and MRI finding underscores the complexity of AA diagnosis during pregnancy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
妊娠期急性阑尾炎评分系统与MRI诊断的比较分析。
简介:急性阑尾炎(AA)是妊娠期最普遍的外科手术适应症。尽管发展了AA诊断的评分系统,但其在妊娠患者中的有效性仍然不完整。鉴于磁共振成像(MRI)的应用越来越广泛,评估评分系统和MRI在诊断妊娠AA中的准确性变得至关重要。方法:选取2013年至2023年间因疑似AA接受MRI检查的孕妇。根据确定的其他诊断或症状的自发消退,将患者分为AA组和对照组。使用了一个国家数据库,以确保患者不寻求进一步的医疗照顾。比较两组患者的Alvarado、Tzanakis、RIPASA、AIR评分系统和MRI结果。结果:180例孕妇MRI疑似AA, 28例经病理检查确诊AA。大多数AA组患者临床评分为负(Alvarado 82%, Tzanakis 84%, RIPASA 68%, AIR 43%)。MRI阳性的占79%。AA组和对照组的人口学特征和临床表现相似。临床评分的阳性预测值(ppv)一般(Alvarado-38%, Tzanakis-57%, RIPASA-22%, AIR-12%),而阴性预测值(npv)在所有评分系统中都很高(80%-86%)。MRI显示PPV为62%,NPV为96%。结论:尽管临床和放射学取得了重大进展,但妊娠AA患者的诊断仍然具有挑战性。临床评分与MRI结果之间的差异凸显了妊娠期AA诊断的复杂性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
World Journal of Surgery
World Journal of Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
460
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: World Journal of Surgery is the official publication of the International Society of Surgery/Societe Internationale de Chirurgie (iss-sic.com). Under the editorship of Dr. Julie Ann Sosa, World Journal of Surgery provides an in-depth, international forum for the most authoritative information on major clinical problems in the fields of clinical and experimental surgery, surgical education, and socioeconomic aspects of surgical care. Contributions are reviewed and selected by a group of distinguished surgeons from across the world who make up the Editorial Board.
期刊最新文献
Management of PErioperative Anemia in EmeRgency Laparotomy Patients (PEARL Study). Intraperitoneal Local Anesthetic Instillation for Post-Operative Pain Control After Bariatric Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) in Latin America and the Caribbean: A Scoping Review of Implementation Strategies, Clinical Outcomes, and Health System Impact. Trauma Systems in Conflict Zones: A Qualitative Study of Field Operational Requirements in Humanitarian Care. Artificial Intelligence May Not Be a Panacea for Global Surgery-But It Could Help Democratize It.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1