Canadian Youth Preferences for E-Cigarettes: A Discrete Choice Experiment.

IF 2.1 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Tobacco Use Insights Pub Date : 2025-03-11 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/1179173X251322597
Daniel Eisenkraft Klein, Jiamin Shi, Robert Schwartz
{"title":"Canadian Youth Preferences for E-Cigarettes: A Discrete Choice Experiment.","authors":"Daniel Eisenkraft Klein, Jiamin Shi, Robert Schwartz","doi":"10.1177/1179173X251322597","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> The novelty of e-cigarette regulatory policy poses difficulties for evidence-informed decision making because there is little evaluative evidence on the effects of specific policies. One way to provide evidence to inform Canadian policy in this situation is to learn from users how they would behave under different policy scenarios without actually implementing those policies in real-world settings. Discrete Choice Experiments provide an opportunity to undertake this research. <b>Methods:</b> We recruited an online sample of 600 e-cigarette current and past users aged 16-25, using an existing panel of recently recruited e-cigarette users, to participate in a discrete choice experiment. Participants chose their preferred option from a choice of 2 e-cigarette products described by 4 attributes: flavour availability, location availability, nicotine concentration, and price. <b>Results:</b> Our findings provide an overview of how important each attribute (price, nicotine concentration, availability, and flavour) is to young e-cigarette users. Across all features, as price increases, respondents were less willing to purchase. The study provides evidence that while all 4 attributes have strong effects, nicotine concentration and flavour most significantly influenced preferences for e-cigarettes. <b>Conclusion:</b> This could provide points of comparison and a better understanding of how hypothetical regulatory restrictions could prevent youth uptake of e-cigarettes, encourage current youth vapers to quit vaping, and make e-cigarettes available and useful for smokers interested in vaping to help them completely quit combustible cigarette smoking.</p>","PeriodicalId":43361,"journal":{"name":"Tobacco Use Insights","volume":"18 ","pages":"1179173X251322597"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11898019/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tobacco Use Insights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1179173X251322597","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The novelty of e-cigarette regulatory policy poses difficulties for evidence-informed decision making because there is little evaluative evidence on the effects of specific policies. One way to provide evidence to inform Canadian policy in this situation is to learn from users how they would behave under different policy scenarios without actually implementing those policies in real-world settings. Discrete Choice Experiments provide an opportunity to undertake this research. Methods: We recruited an online sample of 600 e-cigarette current and past users aged 16-25, using an existing panel of recently recruited e-cigarette users, to participate in a discrete choice experiment. Participants chose their preferred option from a choice of 2 e-cigarette products described by 4 attributes: flavour availability, location availability, nicotine concentration, and price. Results: Our findings provide an overview of how important each attribute (price, nicotine concentration, availability, and flavour) is to young e-cigarette users. Across all features, as price increases, respondents were less willing to purchase. The study provides evidence that while all 4 attributes have strong effects, nicotine concentration and flavour most significantly influenced preferences for e-cigarettes. Conclusion: This could provide points of comparison and a better understanding of how hypothetical regulatory restrictions could prevent youth uptake of e-cigarettes, encourage current youth vapers to quit vaping, and make e-cigarettes available and useful for smokers interested in vaping to help them completely quit combustible cigarette smoking.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加拿大青少年对电子烟的偏好:一个离散选择实验。
目标:电子烟监管政策的新颖性给循证决策带来了困难,因为关于具体政策效果的评估证据很少。在这种情况下,为加拿大的政策提供证据的一种方法是,从用户那里了解他们在不同的政策场景下的行为,而不是在现实世界中实际实施这些政策。离散选择实验为开展这一研究提供了机会。方法:我们招募了600名年龄在16-25岁之间的电子烟用户和过去的电子烟用户,使用现有的最近招募的电子烟用户小组,参加离散选择实验。参与者从2种电子烟产品中选择自己喜欢的产品,这些电子烟产品由4个属性描述:口味可得性、地点可得性、尼古丁浓度和价格。结果:我们的研究结果概述了每个属性(价格、尼古丁浓度、可获得性和味道)对年轻电子烟用户的重要性。在所有功能中,随着价格上涨,受访者的购买意愿降低。该研究提供的证据表明,虽然这四个特征都有很强的影响,但尼古丁浓度和味道对电子烟的偏好影响最大。结论:这可以提供比较点,并更好地理解假设的监管限制如何阻止青少年吸电子烟,鼓励当前的青少年戒烟,并使电子烟对对电子烟感兴趣的吸烟者有用,帮助他们完全戒烟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Tobacco Use Insights
Tobacco Use Insights PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
自引率
4.50%
发文量
32
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Social Network Determinants of Cigarette Forgoing and Quit-Related Conversations in a 15-Day Ecological Momentary Assessment Study in Mexico and the US. Early Initiation of Tobacco Use and its Socio-Demographic Correlates in India: Evidence From the Global Adult Tobacco Survey (GATS-2). Multiple Tobacco Product Use and Perceived Cognitive Function Among Young Adults in Kuwait: A Cross-Sectional Study. The New 'Cool'? A Qualitative Study of E-Cigarette Perceptions and Experience Among Irish Adolescents. The Association Between Smoker Protection Laws and Smoking, Employment, and Attempting to Quit Smoking.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1