GPT-3.5 Turbo and GPT-4 Turbo in Title and Abstract Screening for Systematic Reviews.

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL INFORMATICS JMIR Medical Informatics Pub Date : 2025-03-12 DOI:10.2196/64682
Takehiko Oami, Yohei Okada, Taka-Aki Nakada
{"title":"GPT-3.5 Turbo and GPT-4 Turbo in Title and Abstract Screening for Systematic Reviews.","authors":"Takehiko Oami, Yohei Okada, Taka-Aki Nakada","doi":"10.2196/64682","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Unlabelled: </strong>This study demonstrated that while GPT-4 Turbo had superior specificity when compared to GPT-3.5 Turbo (0.98 vs 0.51), as well as comparable sensitivity (0.85 vs 0.83), GPT-3.5 Turbo processed 100 studies faster (0.9 min vs 1.6 min) in citation screening for systematic reviews, suggesting that GPT-4 Turbo may be more suitable due to its higher specificity and highlighting the potential of large language models in optimizing literature selection.</p>","PeriodicalId":56334,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Medical Informatics","volume":"13 ","pages":"e64682"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11922487/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Medical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/64682","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Unlabelled: This study demonstrated that while GPT-4 Turbo had superior specificity when compared to GPT-3.5 Turbo (0.98 vs 0.51), as well as comparable sensitivity (0.85 vs 0.83), GPT-3.5 Turbo processed 100 studies faster (0.9 min vs 1.6 min) in citation screening for systematic reviews, suggesting that GPT-4 Turbo may be more suitable due to its higher specificity and highlighting the potential of large language models in optimizing literature selection.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
GPT-3.5 Turbo和GPT-4 Turbo在题目和摘要筛选中的系统评价
未标记:该研究表明,虽然GPT-4 Turbo与GPT-3.5 Turbo相比具有更高的特异性(0.98 vs 0.51),以及相当的灵敏度(0.85 vs 0.83),但GPT-3.5 Turbo在系统评价的引文筛选中处理100项研究的速度更快(0.9分钟vs 1.6分钟),这表明GPT-4 Turbo可能更适合,因为它具有更高的特异性,并突出了大型语言模型在优化文献选择方面的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JMIR Medical Informatics
JMIR Medical Informatics Medicine-Health Informatics
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
3.10%
发文量
173
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: JMIR Medical Informatics (JMI, ISSN 2291-9694) is a top-rated, tier A journal which focuses on clinical informatics, big data in health and health care, decision support for health professionals, electronic health records, ehealth infrastructures and implementation. It has a focus on applied, translational research, with a broad readership including clinicians, CIOs, engineers, industry and health informatics professionals. Published by JMIR Publications, publisher of the Journal of Medical Internet Research (JMIR), the leading eHealth/mHealth journal (Impact Factor 2016: 5.175), JMIR Med Inform has a slightly different scope (emphasizing more on applications for clinicians and health professionals rather than consumers/citizens, which is the focus of JMIR), publishes even faster, and also allows papers which are more technical or more formative than what would be published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research.
期刊最新文献
Mortality Prediction Among People Living With HIV on Antiretroviral Therapy in Public Health Facilities in Gondar City Administration, Northwest Ethiopia: Machine Learning-Based Study. Quality of Clinical Notes Created by Ambient Listening Generative AI: Pragmatic Prospective Pilot Study. Stress Hyperglycemia Ratio and the Risk of Sepsis in Patients With Heart Failure: Retrospective Cohort Study From Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-IV. Acceptance of Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Practice Among Chinese Physicians: Nationwide Cross-Sectional Survey Using Extended Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology and Explainable Machine Learning. Methodological Development and Assessing Prescribing Determinants Through Cumulative Drug Exposure in Hospitalized Patients: Proof-of-Concept Retrospective Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1