The Oral Glucose Tolerance Test: Changed Results Using Different Drinking Solutions?

Sabine Schipf, Oliver Kuß, Barbara Thorand, Matthias B Schulze, Matthias Nauck, Claudia Meinke-Franze, Nina Ebert, Sigrid Thierry, Sylvia Gastell, Wolfgang Rathmann
{"title":"The Oral Glucose Tolerance Test: Changed Results Using Different Drinking Solutions?","authors":"Sabine Schipf, Oliver Kuß, Barbara Thorand, Matthias B Schulze, Matthias Nauck, Claudia Meinke-Franze, Nina Ebert, Sigrid Thierry, Sylvia Gastell, Wolfgang Rathmann","doi":"10.1055/a-2502-8812","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The impact of different drinking solutions used for an oral glucose tolerance test (oGTT) on 2-h glucose values and gastrointestinal side effects are not clear. This study compared a commercially produced solution (Accu-Chek Roche solution) and a standardized pharmacy solution (NRF 13.8. oGTT solution) within the German National Cohort (NAKO), including the assessment of gastrointestinal symptoms.The Accu-Chek Roche solution comprises mono- and oligosaccharides with blackcurrant juice for enhanced flavor. The NRF 13.8. oGTT solution contained glucose monohydrates only, with citric acid to maintain the pH for preservation, and did not include flavor enhancers. Within a subgroup of the NAKO participants obtaining a standardized 75g oGTT, 818 participants each received the Accu-Chek Roche solution and the NRF 13.8. oGTT solution matched by study center, sex, age, body mass index, and fasting glucose values. Intra-class correlations for 2-h glucose values were calculated and agreement evaluated with Bland-Altman plots; additionally, coefficients of variation and their difference were estimated for the two solutions.The mean difference of the 2-h glucose concentrations between the Accu-Chek Roche and NRF 13.8. oGTT solution was - 3.4 [95% CI - 6.1; - 0.9] mg/dL. The Bland-Altman plot showed increasing variability of differences with increasing 2-h glucose concentrations without a systematic pattern. The intra-class correlations of 2-h glucose values within matched pairs were 22% [95%CI: 16%; 29%]. The coefficients of variation for 2-h glucose observed with the Accu-Chek Roche and NRF 13.8. oGTT solutions were 25% [24%; 27%] and 25% [23%; 26%], respectively, with a difference of 1% [- 1%; 3%]. Nausea or vomiting were observed in<0.1% of matched participants with no differences between the solutions.The differences in 2-h glucose values and frequency of acute gastrointestinal side effects were not clinically different in participants following the consumption of the Accu-Chek Roche or the NRF 13.8. oGTT solutions.</p>","PeriodicalId":94001,"journal":{"name":"Experimental and clinical endocrinology & diabetes : official journal, German Society of Endocrinology [and] German Diabetes Association","volume":"133 3","pages":"133-138"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental and clinical endocrinology & diabetes : official journal, German Society of Endocrinology [and] German Diabetes Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2502-8812","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The impact of different drinking solutions used for an oral glucose tolerance test (oGTT) on 2-h glucose values and gastrointestinal side effects are not clear. This study compared a commercially produced solution (Accu-Chek Roche solution) and a standardized pharmacy solution (NRF 13.8. oGTT solution) within the German National Cohort (NAKO), including the assessment of gastrointestinal symptoms.The Accu-Chek Roche solution comprises mono- and oligosaccharides with blackcurrant juice for enhanced flavor. The NRF 13.8. oGTT solution contained glucose monohydrates only, with citric acid to maintain the pH for preservation, and did not include flavor enhancers. Within a subgroup of the NAKO participants obtaining a standardized 75g oGTT, 818 participants each received the Accu-Chek Roche solution and the NRF 13.8. oGTT solution matched by study center, sex, age, body mass index, and fasting glucose values. Intra-class correlations for 2-h glucose values were calculated and agreement evaluated with Bland-Altman plots; additionally, coefficients of variation and their difference were estimated for the two solutions.The mean difference of the 2-h glucose concentrations between the Accu-Chek Roche and NRF 13.8. oGTT solution was - 3.4 [95% CI - 6.1; - 0.9] mg/dL. The Bland-Altman plot showed increasing variability of differences with increasing 2-h glucose concentrations without a systematic pattern. The intra-class correlations of 2-h glucose values within matched pairs were 22% [95%CI: 16%; 29%]. The coefficients of variation for 2-h glucose observed with the Accu-Chek Roche and NRF 13.8. oGTT solutions were 25% [24%; 27%] and 25% [23%; 26%], respectively, with a difference of 1% [- 1%; 3%]. Nausea or vomiting were observed in<0.1% of matched participants with no differences between the solutions.The differences in 2-h glucose values and frequency of acute gastrointestinal side effects were not clinically different in participants following the consumption of the Accu-Chek Roche or the NRF 13.8. oGTT solutions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
口服葡萄糖耐量试验:使用不同的饮料会改变结果吗?
用于口服葡萄糖耐量试验(oGTT)的不同饮用溶液对2小时葡萄糖值和胃肠道副作用的影响尚不清楚。本研究比较了商业生产的溶液(Accu-Chek Roche溶液)和标准化的药房溶液(NRF 13.8)。oGTT溶液)在德国国家队列(NAKO)中,包括胃肠道症状的评估。Accu-Chek Roche解决方案包括单糖和低聚糖与黑加仑汁增强风味。NRF 13.8。oGTT溶液只含有葡萄糖一水合物,柠檬酸维持pH值以保存,不含风味增强剂。在获得标准化75克oGTT的NAKO参与者亚组中,818名参与者每人接受Accu-Chek罗氏溶液和NRF 13.8。oGTT溶液与研究中心、性别、年龄、体重指数和空腹血糖值相匹配。计算2小时葡萄糖值的类内相关性,并用Bland-Altman图评估一致性;此外,估计了两种解的变异系数及其差异。Accu-Chek Roche与NRF的2 h葡萄糖浓度平均差值为13.8。oGTT溶液为- 3.4 [95% CI - 6.1;- 0.9] mg/dL。Bland-Altman图显示,随着2小时葡萄糖浓度的增加,差异的变异性增加,但无系统模式。配对组内2小时葡萄糖值的类内相关性为22% [95%CI: 16%;29%)。用Accu-Chek Roche和NRF 13.8观察2 h葡萄糖的变异系数。oGTT溶液为25% [24%;27%]和25% [23%;分别为26%,差异为1% [- 1%;3%)。出现恶心或呕吐
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Hemoglobin A1c and Neuropathic Pain in Type 2 Diabetes: A Case-Control Study with the Self-Administered Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs Questionnaire. Diabetic Ulnar Compression Neuropathy. The Impact of Semaglutide on Weight Loss and Inflammation in People with HIV. An Observational Prospective Study in Greek Population. The Clinical Spectrum and Management of Ectopic Cushing's Syndrome: A 12-Year Single-Center Experience. Longitudinal Analysis of Biochemical, Imaging, and Adenoma Size Changes in Primary Hyperparathyroidism.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1