The “what” and “why” of physical education: Exploring K-12 stakeholders’ perceptions

IF 2.6 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH European Physical Education Review Pub Date : 2025-03-13 DOI:10.1177/1356336x251326023
Xiaoping Fan, Jaimie M McMullen
{"title":"The “what” and “why” of physical education: Exploring K-12 stakeholders’ perceptions","authors":"Xiaoping Fan, Jaimie M McMullen","doi":"10.1177/1356336x251326023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Stakeholders’ perceptions may shape the direction of physical education practice and policy. However, there is a lack of comprehensive investigation into the perceptions of K-12 physical education from diverse groups of stakeholders within a single study. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to explore the perceptions of students, classroom teachers, administrators, and parents on the purpose and impact of physical education. Using the social ecological model as a theoretical framework, this study included 28 participants from three schools in the Mountain West United States, consisting of students ( <jats:italic>n </jats:italic> = 8), classroom teachers ( <jats:italic>n </jats:italic> = 9), parents ( <jats:italic>n </jats:italic> = 8), and administrators ( <jats:italic>n </jats:italic> = 3). Paired/group interviews were conducted with students, classroom teachers, and parents, while individual interviews were held with administrators. Each group of stakeholders’ responses to interview questions were analyzed inductively using thematic analysis. The results of this study are presented based on the perceptions of the four groups of stakeholders, focusing on two aspects: the purpose of physical education (the “what”) and its perceived impact on children and youth (the “why”). The results indicated that stakeholders’ understanding of the purpose of physical education is closely tied to the concept of health, while their perceptions of its impact vary. This study highlights the dynamic relationships between physical education and various layers of the social ecological model, including students, classroom teachers, school administrators, and parents. By exploring these interactions, the study provides insights into enhancing the implementation and advocacy of physical education.","PeriodicalId":47681,"journal":{"name":"European Physical Education Review","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Physical Education Review","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336x251326023","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Stakeholders’ perceptions may shape the direction of physical education practice and policy. However, there is a lack of comprehensive investigation into the perceptions of K-12 physical education from diverse groups of stakeholders within a single study. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to explore the perceptions of students, classroom teachers, administrators, and parents on the purpose and impact of physical education. Using the social ecological model as a theoretical framework, this study included 28 participants from three schools in the Mountain West United States, consisting of students ( n = 8), classroom teachers ( n = 9), parents ( n = 8), and administrators ( n = 3). Paired/group interviews were conducted with students, classroom teachers, and parents, while individual interviews were held with administrators. Each group of stakeholders’ responses to interview questions were analyzed inductively using thematic analysis. The results of this study are presented based on the perceptions of the four groups of stakeholders, focusing on two aspects: the purpose of physical education (the “what”) and its perceived impact on children and youth (the “why”). The results indicated that stakeholders’ understanding of the purpose of physical education is closely tied to the concept of health, while their perceptions of its impact vary. This study highlights the dynamic relationships between physical education and various layers of the social ecological model, including students, classroom teachers, school administrators, and parents. By exploring these interactions, the study provides insights into enhancing the implementation and advocacy of physical education.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Physical Education Review
European Physical Education Review EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
5.90%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: - Multidisciplinary Approaches: European Physical Education Review brings together contributions from a wide range of disciplines across the natural and social sciences and humanities. It includes theoretical and research-based articles and occasionally devotes Special Issues to major topics and themes within the field. - International Coverage: European Physical Education Review publishes contributions from Europe and all regions of the world, promoting international communication among scholars and professionals.
期刊最新文献
The “what” and “why” of physical education: Exploring K-12 stakeholders’ perceptions Students’ perceptions of teaching styles use and motivation to participate in PE: A multigroup analysis of the mediating role of basic psychological needs Exploring perceived mattering in physical educators across the teacher career cycle: A focus on two stages Examining the relationships among preservice physical education teachers’ beliefs, emotions, and professional identity Exploring the factors that influence the delivery of physical education in alternative provision schools in England
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1