Investigation of Pressure Injuries With Visual ChatGPT Integration: A Descriptive Cross-Sectional Study

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Journal of Advanced Nursing Pub Date : 2025-03-14 DOI:10.1111/jan.16905
Pelin Karaçay, Polat Goktas, Özgen Yaşar, Burak Uyanik, Sinem Uzlu, Kübra Coşkun, Mesut Benk
{"title":"Investigation of Pressure Injuries With Visual ChatGPT Integration: A Descriptive Cross-Sectional Study","authors":"Pelin Karaçay,&nbsp;Polat Goktas,&nbsp;Özgen Yaşar,&nbsp;Burak Uyanik,&nbsp;Sinem Uzlu,&nbsp;Kübra Coşkun,&nbsp;Mesut Benk","doi":"10.1111/jan.16905","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>This study aimed to assess the performance of Visual ChatGPT in staging pressure injuries using real patient images, compare it to manual staging by expert nurses, and evaluate its applicability as a supportive tool in wound care management.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>This study used a descriptive and comparative cross-sectional design.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The study analysed 155 patient pressure injury images from a hospital database, staged by expert nurses and Visual ChatGPT using the National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel guidelines. Visual ChatGPT's performance was tested in two scenarios: with images only and with images plus wound characteristics. Diagnostic performance was evaluated, including sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and inter-rater agreement (Kappa).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Expert nurses demonstrated superior accuracy and specificity across most pressure injury stages. Visual ChatGPT performed comparably in early-stage pressure injuries, especially when wound characteristics were included, but struggled with unstageable and deep-tissue pressure injuries.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Visual ChatGPT shows potential as an artificial intelligence tool for pressure injury staging and wound management in nursing. However, improvements are necessary for complex cases, ensuring that artificial intelligence complements clinical judgement.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Implications for Profession and/or Patient Care</h3>\n \n <p>Visual ChatGPT can serve as an innovative artificial intelligence tool in clinical settings, assisting less experienced nurses and those in areas with limited wound care specialists in staging and managing pressure injuries.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Reporting Method</h3>\n \n <p>The STROBE checklist was followed for reporting cross-sectional studies in line with the relevant EQUATOR guidelines.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Patient Contribution</h3>\n \n <p>No patient or public contribution.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":54897,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","volume":"82 1","pages":"479-492"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jan.16905","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jan.16905","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

This study aimed to assess the performance of Visual ChatGPT in staging pressure injuries using real patient images, compare it to manual staging by expert nurses, and evaluate its applicability as a supportive tool in wound care management.

Design

This study used a descriptive and comparative cross-sectional design.

Methods

The study analysed 155 patient pressure injury images from a hospital database, staged by expert nurses and Visual ChatGPT using the National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel guidelines. Visual ChatGPT's performance was tested in two scenarios: with images only and with images plus wound characteristics. Diagnostic performance was evaluated, including sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and inter-rater agreement (Kappa).

Results

Expert nurses demonstrated superior accuracy and specificity across most pressure injury stages. Visual ChatGPT performed comparably in early-stage pressure injuries, especially when wound characteristics were included, but struggled with unstageable and deep-tissue pressure injuries.

Conclusion

Visual ChatGPT shows potential as an artificial intelligence tool for pressure injury staging and wound management in nursing. However, improvements are necessary for complex cases, ensuring that artificial intelligence complements clinical judgement.

Implications for Profession and/or Patient Care

Visual ChatGPT can serve as an innovative artificial intelligence tool in clinical settings, assisting less experienced nurses and those in areas with limited wound care specialists in staging and managing pressure injuries.

Reporting Method

The STROBE checklist was followed for reporting cross-sectional studies in line with the relevant EQUATOR guidelines.

Patient Contribution

No patient or public contribution.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
压力损伤与视觉ChatGPT整合的调查:一项描述性横断面研究
本研究旨在评估Visual ChatGPT在使用真实患者图像进行压伤分期中的表现,将其与专家护士手动分期进行比较,并评估其作为伤口护理管理辅助工具的适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.90%
发文量
369
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Advanced Nursing (JAN) contributes to the advancement of evidence-based nursing, midwifery and healthcare by disseminating high quality research and scholarship of contemporary relevance and with potential to advance knowledge for practice, education, management or policy. All JAN papers are required to have a sound scientific, evidential, theoretical or philosophical base and to be critical, questioning and scholarly in approach. As an international journal, JAN promotes diversity of research and scholarship in terms of culture, paradigm and healthcare context. For JAN’s worldwide readership, authors are expected to make clear the wider international relevance of their work and to demonstrate sensitivity to cultural considerations and differences.
期刊最新文献
Factors Affecting Patient Safety Near Miss Reporting: A Systematic Review. Factors Associated With Newly Graduated Nurses' Work Engagement: Systematic Review of Quantitative Studies. Supporting Independent Living Among Individuals With Dementia Who Live Alone: A Qualitative Study With Home-Visit Nurses. Let's Talk About the Elephant in the Room: A Psychological Safety Climate Intervention Among Nursing Teams-A Qualitative Evaluation. Frailty Trajectory Within 3 Months After Discharge Among Older Adults Living With Frailty Who Experience Hip Fracture Surgery and Predictors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1