Numerical study on gas–liquid separation of two-phase swirling flow based on the Eulerian-Eulerian approach and RSM turbulence model

IF 2.3 3区 工程技术 Q1 NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Annals of Nuclear Energy Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-14 DOI:10.1016/j.anucene.2025.111334
Qian Zhang , Wenzhen Chen , Hu Liu
{"title":"Numerical study on gas–liquid separation of two-phase swirling flow based on the Eulerian-Eulerian approach and RSM turbulence model","authors":"Qian Zhang ,&nbsp;Wenzhen Chen ,&nbsp;Hu Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.anucene.2025.111334","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The steam-water separation package in U-tube steam generator is designed to minimize water content to ensure turbine safety. However, the design of this key component still relies on experiments and trial-and-error methods due to the lack of comprehensive analytical success. The two-phase flow inside an axial swirler is modeled by the Eulerian-Eulerian multiphase flow approach, in which both gas and liquid phases are considered as continuous and coupled to each other. The choice of an appropriate turbulence model significantly impacts on the accuracy of simulation results. The simulation performance of three advanced swirling turbulence models on the gas–liquid interface downstream of the swirler is analyzed. The void fractions along the axial cylinder sections above the swirl vanes are compared with the corresponding experimental air core diameter data from the literature. It is found that the void fraction calculated with RNG <em>k-ε</em> and Realizable <em>k-ε</em> turbulence models decreases monotonously with the axial height above the swirl vanes, whereas the RSM model shows an initial decrease followed by an increase. The RSM model’s results align well with experimental data, particularly in predicting the turning point of void fraction. Adequate grid coverage in the boundary layer is essential to capture the gas–liquid interface due to the very thin liquid film. To obtain the better prediction of gas–liquid swirl flow, the RSM turbulence model and appropriate boundary grid coverage are recommended.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8006,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Nuclear Energy","volume":"217 ","pages":"Article 111334"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Nuclear Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306454925001513","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The steam-water separation package in U-tube steam generator is designed to minimize water content to ensure turbine safety. However, the design of this key component still relies on experiments and trial-and-error methods due to the lack of comprehensive analytical success. The two-phase flow inside an axial swirler is modeled by the Eulerian-Eulerian multiphase flow approach, in which both gas and liquid phases are considered as continuous and coupled to each other. The choice of an appropriate turbulence model significantly impacts on the accuracy of simulation results. The simulation performance of three advanced swirling turbulence models on the gas–liquid interface downstream of the swirler is analyzed. The void fractions along the axial cylinder sections above the swirl vanes are compared with the corresponding experimental air core diameter data from the literature. It is found that the void fraction calculated with RNG k-ε and Realizable k-ε turbulence models decreases monotonously with the axial height above the swirl vanes, whereas the RSM model shows an initial decrease followed by an increase. The RSM model’s results align well with experimental data, particularly in predicting the turning point of void fraction. Adequate grid coverage in the boundary layer is essential to capture the gas–liquid interface due to the very thin liquid film. To obtain the better prediction of gas–liquid swirl flow, the RSM turbulence model and appropriate boundary grid coverage are recommended.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于欧拉-欧拉方法和RSM湍流模型的两相旋流气液分离数值研究
u型管蒸汽发生器的蒸汽-水分离包的设计是为了尽量减少水的含量,以保证汽轮机的安全。然而,由于缺乏全面的分析成功,这一关键部件的设计仍然依赖于实验和试错方法。采用欧拉-欧拉多相流方法对轴向旋流器内部的两相流动进行了建模,该方法将气、液相视为连续且相互耦合的两相流。湍流模型的选择对模拟结果的准确性有重要影响。分析了三种先进的旋流模型在旋流器下游气液界面上的仿真性能。将旋流叶片上方轴向圆柱截面上的空隙分数与文献中相应的实验空气芯直径数据进行了比较。结果表明,RNG k-ε和Realizable k-ε湍流模型计算的空隙率随叶片以上轴向高度的增加而单调减小,而RSM模型计算的空隙率则呈现先减小后增大的趋势。RSM模型的结果与实验数据吻合较好,特别是在预测孔隙率拐点方面。由于液体膜非常薄,边界层中足够的网格覆盖对于捕获气液界面至关重要。为了更好地预测气液涡旋流动,建议采用RSM湍流模型和适当的边界网格覆盖。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Nuclear Energy
Annals of Nuclear Energy 工程技术-核科学技术
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
21.10%
发文量
632
审稿时长
7.3 months
期刊介绍: Annals of Nuclear Energy provides an international medium for the communication of original research, ideas and developments in all areas of the field of nuclear energy science and technology. Its scope embraces nuclear fuel reserves, fuel cycles and cost, materials, processing, system and component technology (fission only), design and optimization, direct conversion of nuclear energy sources, environmental control, reactor physics, heat transfer and fluid dynamics, structural analysis, fuel management, future developments, nuclear fuel and safety, nuclear aerosol, neutron physics, computer technology (both software and hardware), risk assessment, radioactive waste disposal and reactor thermal hydraulics. Papers submitted to Annals need to demonstrate a clear link to nuclear power generation/nuclear engineering. Papers which deal with pure nuclear physics, pure health physics, imaging, or attenuation and shielding properties of concretes and various geological materials are not within the scope of the journal. Also, papers that deal with policy or economics are not within the scope of the journal.
期刊最新文献
Capabilities and limitations of advanced LP nodalization compared to full 3D containment models Thermal response characteristics of a badminton-type space reactor system under different orbital illumination conditions Monte Carlo analysis of prompt gamma activation analysis (PGAA): Influence of collimator and filter parameters Research on fault diagnosis method of rotating components in NPPs based on multi-domain feature fusion strategy SAUNA: A Python package for sensitivity and uncertainty analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1