Implementation of a secure electronic form for bloodborne pathogen exposure reporting associated with increased reports among healthcare workers: A quasi-experimental study

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES American journal of infection control Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-11 DOI:10.1016/j.ajic.2025.03.008
Erin Bammann MD , Himgauri Nikrad MHI, BSN, RN, CIC , Deborah Aragon MSPH, CIC , Heather Young MD
{"title":"Implementation of a secure electronic form for bloodborne pathogen exposure reporting associated with increased reports among healthcare workers: A quasi-experimental study","authors":"Erin Bammann MD ,&nbsp;Himgauri Nikrad MHI, BSN, RN, CIC ,&nbsp;Deborah Aragon MSPH, CIC ,&nbsp;Heather Young MD","doi":"10.1016/j.ajic.2025.03.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Bloodborne pathogen exposures (BBPEs) are an ongoing health hazard among health care employees and are often underreported. Prior studies have revealed that BBPEs may be underreported due to challenges related to the reporting process.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This quasi-experimental study was completed using data from the Denver Health and Hospital Authority. BBPE reporting was compared before and after the implementation of a self-reported secure electronic form (SELF) reporting system. The primary outcome was the number of monthly BBPE reports. The secondary outcomes were nurse triage line call volume and proportion of cases referred for urgent evaluation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The mean number of monthly BBPE reports increased by 9.5 (<em>P</em> = .001, 95% CI 6.23, 12.54), the mean number of monthly nurse triage line calls decreased from 7 to 23 (<em>P</em> &lt; .001, 95% CI 14.39, 19.22), and referral for urgent evaluation decreased by 61.8% (<em>P</em> &lt; .001, df = 1) between the preintervention and postintervention periods.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Implementing a SELF may help capture a greater number of BBPE reports in large health care systems compared with a nurse triage system alone. Additionally, SELFs allow for the acquisition of additional descriptive information about BBPEs and may help reduce unnecessary emergency department utilization.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7621,"journal":{"name":"American journal of infection control","volume":"53 8","pages":"Pages 869-874"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of infection control","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196655325001099","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Bloodborne pathogen exposures (BBPEs) are an ongoing health hazard among health care employees and are often underreported. Prior studies have revealed that BBPEs may be underreported due to challenges related to the reporting process.

Methods

This quasi-experimental study was completed using data from the Denver Health and Hospital Authority. BBPE reporting was compared before and after the implementation of a self-reported secure electronic form (SELF) reporting system. The primary outcome was the number of monthly BBPE reports. The secondary outcomes were nurse triage line call volume and proportion of cases referred for urgent evaluation.

Results

The mean number of monthly BBPE reports increased by 9.5 (P = .001, 95% CI 6.23, 12.54), the mean number of monthly nurse triage line calls decreased from 7 to 23 (P < .001, 95% CI 14.39, 19.22), and referral for urgent evaluation decreased by 61.8% (P < .001, df = 1) between the preintervention and postintervention periods.

Conclusions

Implementing a SELF may help capture a greater number of BBPE reports in large health care systems compared with a nurse triage system alone. Additionally, SELFs allow for the acquisition of additional descriptive information about BBPEs and may help reduce unnecessary emergency department utilization.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
实施安全电子形式的血源性病原体暴露报告与增加报告在医护人员:一项准实验研究。
背景:血源性病原体暴露(BBPEs)是医护人员中持续存在的健康危害,并且经常被低估。先前的研究表明,由于报告过程中的挑战,bbpe可能被低估了。方法:本准实验研究使用丹佛卫生和医院管理局(DHHA)的数据完成。比较实施自我报告安全电子表格(SELF)报告系统前后BBPE报告发生率。主要结果是每月BBPE报告的发生率。次要结果是护士分诊线呼叫量和转介进行紧急医疗保健评估的病例比例。结果:干预前和干预后,BBPE报告的平均数量每月增加9.5例(p = 0.001, 95% CI 6.23, 12.54),护士分类电话的平均数量从每月23例减少到7例(p < 0.001, 95% CI 14.39, 19.22),紧急医疗保健评估的转诊减少了61.8% (p < 0.001, df = 1)。结论:与单独的护士分诊系统相比,在大型医疗保健系统中实施SELF可能有助于捕获更多的BBPE报告。此外,self允许获取有关BBPE的额外描述性信息,这些信息可用于在规划层面上通知未来的BBPE预防。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
4.10%
发文量
479
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: AJIC covers key topics and issues in infection control and epidemiology. Infection control professionals, including physicians, nurses, and epidemiologists, rely on AJIC for peer-reviewed articles covering clinical topics as well as original research. As the official publication of the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology (APIC)
期刊最新文献
Microbial contamination in reusable health care bath basins: An observational descriptive study Rethinking sterility in surgical hand-drying: Evidence-based, cost-efficient, and globally scalable practice Bacterial air contamination and the protective effect of coverage for sterile surgical goods: A randomized controlled trial Burden of early healthcare-associated infections after kidney or kidney-pancreas transplantations: A 6-year prospective surveillance in a French university reference center Trends of economic evidence in infection prevention and control practices for hospital-acquired infections
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1