Diagnostic utility of endobronchial ultrasound elastography for detecting benign and malignant lymph nodes: a retrospective study.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Journal of thoracic disease Pub Date : 2025-02-28 Epub Date: 2025-02-25 DOI:10.21037/jtd-24-1042
Xinyu Zhou, Yaqing Li
{"title":"Diagnostic utility of endobronchial ultrasound elastography for detecting benign and malignant lymph nodes: a retrospective study.","authors":"Xinyu Zhou, Yaqing Li","doi":"10.21037/jtd-24-1042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) elastography is a diagnostic tool used for measuring the elasticity of intrathoracic lesions. It is still essential for discussions about how accurate elastography is at identifying benign and malignant mediastinal and hilar lymph nodes. The objective of this study was to investigate the diagnostic utility of EBUS elastography and to determine the variables affecting this procedure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a single-center, retrospective study involving patients with suspected lung cancer who underwent EBUS elastography followed by endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) at Zhejiang Cancer Hospital between October 2021 and March 2023. The pathological results of EBUS-TBNA, validated through a six-month follow-up, served as the gold standard. Each lymph node had its ultrasonic elastography indices recorded, including the elastography grading score, blue color ratio (BCR), blue color score, and short axis diameter. The diagnostic efficacy of elastography was assessed using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, which differentiated between benign and malignant lymph nodes. To investigate the factors impacting the elastography indices, multivariate logistic regression was used with multiple serological markers, lymph node location, and pathology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 168 patients, 322 lymph nodes were punctured, with 175 (54.3%) being malignant. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for the combined index of elastography grading score and short-axis diameter was 0.702 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.645-0.759]. While the pathology of the lymph nodes was found to influence the BCR, BCR was unable to distinguish between lymph nodes with benign conditions and those with small cell carcinoma.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of elastography data alone may be inadequate for diagnosing metastatic lymph nodes. However, elastography can provide supplementary diagnostic information during EBUS-TBNA. Invasive EBUS-TBNA remains recommended as it aids in the identification of malignant lymph nodes when used in conjunction with pathological, radiological, and clinical findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":17542,"journal":{"name":"Journal of thoracic disease","volume":"17 2","pages":"614-622"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11898354/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of thoracic disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd-24-1042","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) elastography is a diagnostic tool used for measuring the elasticity of intrathoracic lesions. It is still essential for discussions about how accurate elastography is at identifying benign and malignant mediastinal and hilar lymph nodes. The objective of this study was to investigate the diagnostic utility of EBUS elastography and to determine the variables affecting this procedure.

Methods: We conducted a single-center, retrospective study involving patients with suspected lung cancer who underwent EBUS elastography followed by endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) at Zhejiang Cancer Hospital between October 2021 and March 2023. The pathological results of EBUS-TBNA, validated through a six-month follow-up, served as the gold standard. Each lymph node had its ultrasonic elastography indices recorded, including the elastography grading score, blue color ratio (BCR), blue color score, and short axis diameter. The diagnostic efficacy of elastography was assessed using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, which differentiated between benign and malignant lymph nodes. To investigate the factors impacting the elastography indices, multivariate logistic regression was used with multiple serological markers, lymph node location, and pathology.

Results: Of the 168 patients, 322 lymph nodes were punctured, with 175 (54.3%) being malignant. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for the combined index of elastography grading score and short-axis diameter was 0.702 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.645-0.759]. While the pathology of the lymph nodes was found to influence the BCR, BCR was unable to distinguish between lymph nodes with benign conditions and those with small cell carcinoma.

Conclusions: The use of elastography data alone may be inadequate for diagnosing metastatic lymph nodes. However, elastography can provide supplementary diagnostic information during EBUS-TBNA. Invasive EBUS-TBNA remains recommended as it aids in the identification of malignant lymph nodes when used in conjunction with pathological, radiological, and clinical findings.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
支气管内超声弹性成像检测良恶性淋巴结的诊断价值:回顾性研究。
背景:支气管超声(EBUS)弹性成像是测量胸内病变弹性的一种诊断工具。讨论弹性成像如何准确地识别良性和恶性纵隔和肺门淋巴结仍是必要的。本研究的目的是探讨EBUS弹性成像的诊断效用,并确定影响该程序的变量。方法:我们进行了一项单中心回顾性研究,纳入了2021年10月至2023年3月在浙江肿瘤医院接受EBUS弹性成像后支气管超声引导下经支气管针抽吸(EBUS- tbna)的疑似肺癌患者。EBUS-TBNA的病理结果,通过六个月的随访验证,作为金标准。记录每个淋巴结的超声弹性成像指标,包括弹性成像分级评分、蓝色比(BCR)、蓝色评分、短轴直径。使用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评估弹性成像的诊断效果,该曲线可区分良恶性淋巴结。为了研究影响弹性成像指数的因素,我们使用了多种血清学指标、淋巴结位置和病理的多因素logistic回归。结果:168例患者中,穿刺淋巴结322例,恶性175例,占54.3%。弹性评分与短轴直径联合指数的ROC曲线下面积(AUC)为0.702[95%可信区间(CI): 0.645-0.759]。虽然发现淋巴结的病理会影响BCR,但BCR无法区分良性淋巴结和小细胞癌。结论:仅使用弹性成像数据可能不足以诊断转移性淋巴结。然而,弹性成像可以在EBUS-TBNA期间提供补充诊断信息。侵入性EBUS-TBNA仍然被推荐,因为它有助于识别恶性淋巴结,当与病理、放射学和临床结果结合使用时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of thoracic disease
Journal of thoracic disease RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.00%
发文量
254
期刊介绍: The Journal of Thoracic Disease (JTD, J Thorac Dis, pISSN: 2072-1439; eISSN: 2077-6624) was founded in Dec 2009, and indexed in PubMed in Dec 2011 and Science Citation Index SCI in Feb 2013. It is published quarterly (Dec 2009- Dec 2011), bimonthly (Jan 2012 - Dec 2013), monthly (Jan. 2014-) and openly distributed worldwide. JTD received its impact factor of 2.365 for the year 2016. JTD publishes manuscripts that describe new findings and provide current, practical information on the diagnosis and treatment of conditions related to thoracic disease. All the submission and reviewing are conducted electronically so that rapid review is assured.
期刊最新文献
Assessment of susceptibility to mTOR rs2295080 gene polymorphism in Guangxi Zhuang lung cancer population. Impact of non-tumor size related features on staging in non-small cell lung cancer: a population-level analysis of the SEER-medicare database. Unraveling the molecular mechanisms of smoking-associated non-small cell lung cancer: a comprehensive analysis of genetic, therapeutic, and immunological. Thoracoscopic lobectomy for early-stage non-small cell lung carcinoma: initial experience from a newly established Israeli center. Impact of perioperative chemotherapy on survival outcomes in patients with non-small cell lung cancer undergoing pneumonectomy: a SEER database analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1