Cervical Disc Arthroplasty Versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion in the Treatment of Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: Patient Characteristics and Surgical Outcomes in a National Administrative Database.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Global Spine Journal Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-13 DOI:10.1177/21925682251325823
Charles N de Leeuw, Won Hyung Andrew Ryu, Jung Yoo, Josiah N Orina
{"title":"Cervical Disc Arthroplasty Versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion in the Treatment of Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: Patient Characteristics and Surgical Outcomes in a National Administrative Database.","authors":"Charles N de Leeuw, Won Hyung Andrew Ryu, Jung Yoo, Josiah N Orina","doi":"10.1177/21925682251325823","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Study DesignA retrospective cohort utilizing the PearlDiver Patient Claims Database.ObjectiveCervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) is accepted treatment for cervical radiculopathy; however, it may also be safe and effective in myelopathy. Thus, we compared clinical characteristics and outcomes in patients undergoing CDA and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) specifically.MethodsPatients undergoing CDA or ACDF between 2015-2019 were identified with follow-up through 2021. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed to identify factors associated with either procedure. Reoperation rates were compared using propensity-matched analysis.ResultsWe identified n = 2391 CDA and n = 50 845 ACDF procedures for DCM. Factors favoring CDA included: female sex, younger age, lower CCI, lower incidence of obesity, osteoporosis, diabetes, or smoking (<i>P</i> ≤ .001); remaining significant after multivariable logistic regression except for sex (<i>P</i> = .06). Single-level surgery was more predictive for undergoing CDA. CDA patients had lower 90-day readmissions, complications, and lower opioid utilization. The overall reoperation rate was 5%. Predictors of reoperation included: male sex, younger age, greater CCI, obesity, osteoporosis, diabetes, smoking, and multi-level surgery; all remaining significant after multivariable analysis except for diabetes (<i>P</i> = .23) and CCI (<i>P</i> = .05). After propensity-matching CDA and ACDF patients (n = 2391), there was no difference in re-operation rates (<i>P</i> = .47).ConclusionsCDA patients were healthier (less obesity, smoking, diabetes, better CCI) and represented 4.5% of anterior procedures for DCM. In univariate analysis, readmission rates, medical complications, and opioid use were lower in CDA patients, despite a similar reoperation rate. Considering these findings, CDA might be used very selectively for DCM.</p>","PeriodicalId":12680,"journal":{"name":"Global Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"3637-3647"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11907496/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682251325823","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study DesignA retrospective cohort utilizing the PearlDiver Patient Claims Database.ObjectiveCervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) is accepted treatment for cervical radiculopathy; however, it may also be safe and effective in myelopathy. Thus, we compared clinical characteristics and outcomes in patients undergoing CDA and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) specifically.MethodsPatients undergoing CDA or ACDF between 2015-2019 were identified with follow-up through 2021. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed to identify factors associated with either procedure. Reoperation rates were compared using propensity-matched analysis.ResultsWe identified n = 2391 CDA and n = 50 845 ACDF procedures for DCM. Factors favoring CDA included: female sex, younger age, lower CCI, lower incidence of obesity, osteoporosis, diabetes, or smoking (P ≤ .001); remaining significant after multivariable logistic regression except for sex (P = .06). Single-level surgery was more predictive for undergoing CDA. CDA patients had lower 90-day readmissions, complications, and lower opioid utilization. The overall reoperation rate was 5%. Predictors of reoperation included: male sex, younger age, greater CCI, obesity, osteoporosis, diabetes, smoking, and multi-level surgery; all remaining significant after multivariable analysis except for diabetes (P = .23) and CCI (P = .05). After propensity-matching CDA and ACDF patients (n = 2391), there was no difference in re-operation rates (P = .47).ConclusionsCDA patients were healthier (less obesity, smoking, diabetes, better CCI) and represented 4.5% of anterior procedures for DCM. In univariate analysis, readmission rates, medical complications, and opioid use were lower in CDA patients, despite a similar reoperation rate. Considering these findings, CDA might be used very selectively for DCM.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
颈椎椎间盘置换术与前路颈椎椎间盘切除术融合治疗退行性颈椎病:国家行政数据库中的患者特征和手术结果。
研究设计:采用PearlDiver患者索赔数据库的回顾性队列研究。目的颈椎间盘置换术(CDA)是治疗颈神经根病的常用方法;然而,它对脊髓病也可能是安全有效的。因此,我们比较了行CDA和前路颈椎椎间盘切除术融合(ACDF)治疗退行性颈椎病(DCM)患者的临床特征和结果。方法确定2015-2019年期间接受CDA或ACDF的患者,随访至2021年。进行单变量和多变量分析,以确定与任何一种程序相关的因素。再手术率采用倾向匹配分析进行比较。结果共鉴定出n = 2391例CDA和n = 50845例ACDF。支持CDA的因素包括:女性、年轻、较低的CCI、较低的肥胖、骨质疏松、糖尿病或吸烟发生率(P≤0.001);多变量logistic回归后,除性别外,其余均显著(P = .06)。单节段手术更能预测CDA的发生。CDA患者的90天再入院率、并发症和阿片类药物使用率较低。总再手术率为5%。再手术的预测因素包括:男性、年龄小、CCI大、肥胖、骨质疏松、糖尿病、吸烟和多级别手术;多变量分析后,除糖尿病(P = .23)和CCI (P = .05)外,其余均显著。经倾向匹配的CDA和ACDF患者(n = 2391),再手术率无差异(P = 0.47)。结论scda患者更健康(肥胖、吸烟、糖尿病较少,CCI较好),占DCM前路手术的4.5%。在单变量分析中,CDA患者的再入院率、医疗并发症和阿片类药物使用较低,尽管再手术率相似。考虑到这些发现,CDA可能非常有选择性地用于DCM。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Global Spine Journal
Global Spine Journal Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
278
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Spine Journal (GSJ) is the official scientific publication of AOSpine. A peer-reviewed, open access journal, devoted to the study and treatment of spinal disorders, including diagnosis, operative and non-operative treatment options, surgical techniques, and emerging research and clinical developments.GSJ is indexed in PubMedCentral, SCOPUS, and Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI).
期刊最新文献
Apical Vertebral Translation as a Coronal Risk Factor for Side-Specific Hip Osteoarthritis in Adult Degenerative Scoliosis. Does Gabapentin Use Following ACDF Decrease Opioid Utilization? A Retrospective Propensity-Matched Analysis Conducted in Academic Medical Centers. The Modified 5-Item Frailty Index as a Predictor of Postoperative Complications in Patients Undergoing Spinal Surgery. Performance Comparison at Different Levels of Surgical Complexity. Opioid Use in Opioid Naive Patients After Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery. High-Speed Instance Segmentation for Endoscopic Spine Surgery: Multicenter Validation and Inference Speed Evaluation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1