Knowledge of pregnant women and healthcare professionals regarding oral health during pregnancy: a data mining analysis.

Q3 Medicine General dentistry Pub Date : 2025-03-01
Mayara Costa Motta, Marcia Barcelos Gomes, Mariana Leonel Martins, Andréa Fonseca-Gonçalves
{"title":"Knowledge of pregnant women and healthcare professionals regarding oral health during pregnancy: a data mining analysis.","authors":"Mayara Costa Motta, Marcia Barcelos Gomes, Mariana Leonel Martins, Andréa Fonseca-Gonçalves","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This review reports on the knowledge of pregnant women and healthcare professionals regarding oral health during pregnancy (OHP) through a data mining analysis of the literature. Searches were conducted in 6 electronic databases to select observational and interventional studies that assessed the knowledge of pregnant women and healthcare professionals regarding OHP. The collected data included the year and country of publication, data collection instrument, study type, participants, knowledge level, and factors associated with knowledge. A total of 85 studies published from 1984 to 2023 were included in the analysis, 53 (62.3%) of which were issued in the last decade. The highest number of publications originated from Brazil (n = 24; 28.2%). Questionnaires alone (n = 68; 80.0%) and observational studies (n = 80; 94.1%) were the most frequent instrument and type of study, respectively. In almost half of the studies (n = 42; 49.4%), the participants were pregnant women; other frequently studied groups were dentists (n = 19; 22.3%), gynecologists/obstetricians (n = 14; 16.4%), and midwives (n = 13; 15.3%). In 29 (76.3%) observational studies, the knowledge of pregnant women was poor. Some observational studies of dentists found that they had good (6/19; 31.6%) or moderate (2/19; 10.5%) knowledge of the subject, but more than half (11/19; 57.9%) indicated that dentists had poor knowledge. Most studies reported that gynecologists/obstetricians (10/14; 71.4%) and midwives (n = 10/12; 83.3%) demonstrated poor knowledge. However, 4 of 5 interventional studies (80.0%) found an improvement in the OHP knowledge of pregnant women (3/4; 75.0%) or midwives (1/1; 100.0%) after health education measures. Lower education level, lower income, and infrequent dental visits were associated with less knowledge of OHP among pregnant women. Longer practice duration, ongoing oral health education, and higher academic qualifications were associated with greater knowledge of OHP among professionals. Studies suggest that pregnant women and healthcare professionals have limited knowledge of OHP but demonstrate increased awareness after education interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":12571,"journal":{"name":"General dentistry","volume":"73 2","pages":"24-33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"General dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This review reports on the knowledge of pregnant women and healthcare professionals regarding oral health during pregnancy (OHP) through a data mining analysis of the literature. Searches were conducted in 6 electronic databases to select observational and interventional studies that assessed the knowledge of pregnant women and healthcare professionals regarding OHP. The collected data included the year and country of publication, data collection instrument, study type, participants, knowledge level, and factors associated with knowledge. A total of 85 studies published from 1984 to 2023 were included in the analysis, 53 (62.3%) of which were issued in the last decade. The highest number of publications originated from Brazil (n = 24; 28.2%). Questionnaires alone (n = 68; 80.0%) and observational studies (n = 80; 94.1%) were the most frequent instrument and type of study, respectively. In almost half of the studies (n = 42; 49.4%), the participants were pregnant women; other frequently studied groups were dentists (n = 19; 22.3%), gynecologists/obstetricians (n = 14; 16.4%), and midwives (n = 13; 15.3%). In 29 (76.3%) observational studies, the knowledge of pregnant women was poor. Some observational studies of dentists found that they had good (6/19; 31.6%) or moderate (2/19; 10.5%) knowledge of the subject, but more than half (11/19; 57.9%) indicated that dentists had poor knowledge. Most studies reported that gynecologists/obstetricians (10/14; 71.4%) and midwives (n = 10/12; 83.3%) demonstrated poor knowledge. However, 4 of 5 interventional studies (80.0%) found an improvement in the OHP knowledge of pregnant women (3/4; 75.0%) or midwives (1/1; 100.0%) after health education measures. Lower education level, lower income, and infrequent dental visits were associated with less knowledge of OHP among pregnant women. Longer practice duration, ongoing oral health education, and higher academic qualifications were associated with greater knowledge of OHP among professionals. Studies suggest that pregnant women and healthcare professionals have limited knowledge of OHP but demonstrate increased awareness after education interventions.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
孕妇和保健专业人员关于孕期口腔健康的知识:数据挖掘分析。
本综述通过对文献的数据挖掘分析,报告了孕妇和卫生保健专业人员关于孕期口腔健康的知识。在6个电子数据库中进行了检索,以选择评估孕妇和卫生保健专业人员关于OHP知识的观察性和干预性研究。收集的数据包括出版年份和国家、数据收集工具、研究类型、参与者、知识水平和与知识相关的因素。1984年至2023年共发表的85项研究被纳入分析,其中53项(62.3%)是在最近十年发表的。来自巴西的出版物数量最多(n = 24;28.2%)。单独问卷调查(n = 68;80.0%)和观察性研究(n = 80;94.1%)分别是最常见的研究工具和研究类型。在几乎一半的研究中(n = 42;49.4%),参与者为孕妇;其他经常被研究的群体是牙医(n = 19;22.3%),妇科/产科医生(n = 14;16.4%),助产士(n = 13;15.3%)。在29项(76.3%)观察性研究中,孕妇知识贫乏。一些对牙医的观察性研究发现,他们有良好的(6/19;31.6%)或中等(2/19;10.5%),但超过一半(11/19;57.9%)表示牙医知识贫乏。大多数研究报告妇科医生/产科医生(10/14;71.4%)和助产士(n = 10/12;83.3%)表现出知识贫乏。然而,5项介入研究中有4项(80.0%)发现孕妇的OHP知识有所改善(3/4;75.0%)或助产士(1/1;100.0%)。较低的教育水平、较低的收入和较少的牙科就诊与孕妇对OHP的了解程度较低有关。较长的执业时间、持续的口腔健康教育和较高的学历与专业人员对口腔健康问题的了解程度有关。研究表明,孕妇和卫生保健专业人员对OHP的了解有限,但经过教育干预后,认识有所提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
General dentistry
General dentistry Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
134
期刊介绍: General Dentistry is the premier peer-reviewed journal of the Academy of General Dentistry (AGD). Published bi-monthly, General Dentistry presents research and clinical findings to support the full range of procedures that general dentists perform on a regular basis.
期刊最新文献
A practical model for integrated temporomandibular disorder assessment in the routine oral examination. Developing a hybrid-resolution composite scan index. Azithromycin in dentistry: a second-line antibiotic with specific indications. Control of fluids in the canal system. Evaluation of osseointegrated implants subjected to orthodontic force: radiographic examination and resonance frequency analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1