Lacertus fibrosus release in proximal median nerve entrapment- a systematic review.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS International Orthopaedics Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-14 DOI:10.1007/s00264-025-06493-5
Qutaiba N M Shah Mardan, Alreem Al-Khayarin, Fadi Bouri, Mohammed Muneer
{"title":"Lacertus fibrosus release in proximal median nerve entrapment- a systematic review.","authors":"Qutaiba N M Shah Mardan, Alreem Al-Khayarin, Fadi Bouri, Mohammed Muneer","doi":"10.1007/s00264-025-06493-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The role of lacertus fibrosis as the primary perpetrator behind the illusive pronator teres syndrome is becoming increasingly recognized in recent literature. The aim of this systematic review is to explore the outcomes of lacertus fibrosis release in patients complaining of proximal median nerve entrapment signs and symptoms.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>In this systematic review, Pubmed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Ovid databases were reviewed. Studies in which structures, other than the lacertus fibrosus, in the proximal forearm had been concomitantly released were deemed illegible. Various outcome assessment tools were utilized; those were pain, numbness, and satisfaction visual analog scales, return of function and muscle strength, quick DASH, work DASH, and activity DASH scores. Adherence to PRISMA guidelines was maintained.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of seven studies, three interventional and 4 retrospective observational studies, were included in this review out of 118 articles. These included 446 participants who underwent lacertus fibrosis release with a mean age of 45 years old across a mean duration of postoperative follow-up of 16.1 months. A significant proportion of the patients had a history of unsuccessful conservative or surgical management (prior carpal tunnel release in 10.5%). Minimal access surgery under WALANT was performed in 95%, US-guided release under WALANT in 3.3%, and open exploration was done in 1.5%. A horizontal incision hidden in the elbow flexion creese was done in 74.2%, oblique incision 2 cm distal and 2 cm radial to the medial epicondyle in 20.8%, and open exploration through a Z-shaped incision over the antecubital fossa in 1.5%. Immediate pain relief and return of function and strength was reported in 99.6%. A significant improvement was reported in postoperative quick DASH (mean = 24 points), work DASH (mean = 28.8 points), and activity DASH (mean = 44.8 points). Further, a significantly lower VAS score was obtained on pain, numbness, and paraesthesia scales. There were two complications, a case of postoperative haematoma and another case of surgical site infection. Seven patients complained of residual symptoms by the end of the follow up duration; carpal tunnel release was done in three and release of superficialis arcade was necessitated in four other cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Lacertus syndrome can be optimally managed by surgically releasing the lacertus fibrosus. This can be done as a minimally invasive procedure under WALANT. A high index of suspicion is required when encountering patients with signs and symptoms of median nerve entrapment, specifically those who were treated unsuccessfully with the presumption of carpal tunnel syndrome.</p>","PeriodicalId":14450,"journal":{"name":"International Orthopaedics","volume":" ","pages":"1167-1174"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12003460/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-025-06493-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The role of lacertus fibrosis as the primary perpetrator behind the illusive pronator teres syndrome is becoming increasingly recognized in recent literature. The aim of this systematic review is to explore the outcomes of lacertus fibrosis release in patients complaining of proximal median nerve entrapment signs and symptoms.

Methodology: In this systematic review, Pubmed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Ovid databases were reviewed. Studies in which structures, other than the lacertus fibrosus, in the proximal forearm had been concomitantly released were deemed illegible. Various outcome assessment tools were utilized; those were pain, numbness, and satisfaction visual analog scales, return of function and muscle strength, quick DASH, work DASH, and activity DASH scores. Adherence to PRISMA guidelines was maintained.

Results: A total of seven studies, three interventional and 4 retrospective observational studies, were included in this review out of 118 articles. These included 446 participants who underwent lacertus fibrosis release with a mean age of 45 years old across a mean duration of postoperative follow-up of 16.1 months. A significant proportion of the patients had a history of unsuccessful conservative or surgical management (prior carpal tunnel release in 10.5%). Minimal access surgery under WALANT was performed in 95%, US-guided release under WALANT in 3.3%, and open exploration was done in 1.5%. A horizontal incision hidden in the elbow flexion creese was done in 74.2%, oblique incision 2 cm distal and 2 cm radial to the medial epicondyle in 20.8%, and open exploration through a Z-shaped incision over the antecubital fossa in 1.5%. Immediate pain relief and return of function and strength was reported in 99.6%. A significant improvement was reported in postoperative quick DASH (mean = 24 points), work DASH (mean = 28.8 points), and activity DASH (mean = 44.8 points). Further, a significantly lower VAS score was obtained on pain, numbness, and paraesthesia scales. There were two complications, a case of postoperative haematoma and another case of surgical site infection. Seven patients complained of residual symptoms by the end of the follow up duration; carpal tunnel release was done in three and release of superficialis arcade was necessitated in four other cases.

Conclusion: Lacertus syndrome can be optimally managed by surgically releasing the lacertus fibrosus. This can be done as a minimally invasive procedure under WALANT. A high index of suspicion is required when encountering patients with signs and symptoms of median nerve entrapment, specifically those who were treated unsuccessfully with the presumption of carpal tunnel syndrome.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
近端正中神经卡压中纤维撕裂肌释放的系统回顾。
背景:在最近的文献中,裂片纤维化作为假旋前肌综合征的主要肇事者的作用越来越被认识到。本系统综述的目的是探讨在主诉近正中神经卡压的患者中,瘢痕纤维化释放的结果。方法学:系统综述了Pubmed、Cochrane Library、Scopus、Ovid等数据库。除纤维撕裂肌外,前臂近端结构同时被释放的研究被认为是难以辨认的。使用了各种结果评估工具;分别是疼痛、麻木和满意度视觉模拟量表、功能恢复和肌肉力量、快速DASH、工作DASH和活动DASH评分。继续遵守PRISMA准则。结果:本综述纳入118篇文献,共纳入7项研究,其中3项为干预性研究,4项为回顾性观察性研究。其中包括446名参与者,平均年龄为45岁,术后平均随访时间为16.1个月。相当大比例的患者有保守或手术治疗失败的历史(10.5%的患者先前有腕管释放)。在WALANT下进行最小通路手术的比例为95%,在WALANT下进行us引导释放的比例为3.3%,开放探查的比例为1.5%。74.2%的患者采用肘关节屈曲区水平切口,20.8%的患者采用远端2 cm和桡骨2 cm至内上髁的斜切口,1.5%的患者采用肘前窝z形切口。据报道,99.6%的患者疼痛立即缓解,功能和力量恢复。术后快速DASH(平均24分)、工作DASH(平均28.8分)、活动DASH(平均44.8分)均有明显改善。此外,疼痛、麻木和感觉异常评分明显较低。术后出现2例并发症,一例术后血肿,另一例手术部位感染。随访结束时,7例患者有残留症状;3例行腕管松解术,4例行拱廊浅肌松解术。结论:术中松解纤维性裂口肌是治疗裂口综合征的最佳方法。这可以作为WALANT下的微创手术来完成。当遇到有正中神经卡压症状和体征的患者时,特别是那些推定为腕管综合征而治疗失败的患者,需要高度怀疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Orthopaedics
International Orthopaedics 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
7.40%
发文量
360
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: International Orthopaedics, the Official Journal of the Société Internationale de Chirurgie Orthopédique et de Traumatologie (SICOT) , publishes original papers from all over the world. The articles deal with clinical orthopaedic surgery or basic research directly connected with orthopaedic surgery. International Orthopaedics will also link all the members of SICOT by means of an insert that will be concerned with SICOT matters. Finally, it is expected that news and information regarding all aspects of orthopaedic surgery, including meetings, panels, instructional courses, etc. will be brought to the attention of the readers. Manuscripts submitted for publication must contain a statement to the effect that all human studies have been approved by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. It should also be stated clearly in the text that all persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Details that might disclose the identity of the subjects under study should be omitted. Reports of animal experiments must state that the "Principles of laboratory animal care" (NIH publication No. 85-23, revised 1985) were followed, as well as specific national laws (e.g. the current version of the German Law on the Protection of Animals) where applicable. The editors reserve the right to reject manuscripts that do not comply with the above-mentioned requirements. The author will be held responsible for false statements or for failure to fulfil the above-mentioned requirements.
期刊最新文献
In stage II osteonecrosis, bone grafting delays femoral head collapse compared with core decompression in glucocorticoid-associated osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Do intraoperative calcar fractures increase early complications or revisions in short stem total hip arthroplasty? A propensity score matching study. Patellar resurfacing is associated with reduced postoperative effusion compared with synovectomy in severe chondrocalcinosis undergoing total knee arthroplasty. Determinants of waste generation in operating rooms. Letter to the Editor regarding "Robotic-Assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty restores native joint line height and reduces alignment outliers".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1