Théophile Harlé, Jona Joachim, Pierre Boutouyrie, Joaquim Mateo, Jade Perdereau, Alexandre Mebazaa, Jérome Cartailler, Fabrice Vallée
{"title":"Continuous measurement of carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV<sub>cf.</sub>) during general anaesthesia using Doppler: a preliminary study.","authors":"Théophile Harlé, Jona Joachim, Pierre Boutouyrie, Joaquim Mateo, Jade Perdereau, Alexandre Mebazaa, Jérome Cartailler, Fabrice Vallée","doi":"10.1007/s10877-024-01256-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study explores the feasibility of continuous pulse wave velocity (PWV) monitoring during general anaesthesia (GA), particularly in response to blood pressure fluctuations. Our aim is to evaluate whether dynamic PWV can provide new insight to detect cardiovascular risks. From December 2022 to February 2023, continuous carotid and femoral Doppler monitoring was performed on patients scheduled for surgery with GA, to collect PWV data at awakening (PWV<sub>AW</sub>) and during GA (PWV<sub>GA</sub>). The study investigated PWV's response to MAP fluctuations using the α-angle, a dynamic stiffness parameter. We evaluated PWV and α-angle efficacy in discriminating between low (CVR-) and high (CVR+) cardiovascular risk patients. Among 43 patients, 41 (95%) had successful PWV measurements. PWV<sub>AW</sub> was significantly higher than PWV<sub>GA</sub> (8.1 vs. 7.4 m.s<sup>-1</sup>, p < 0.0001). This difference vanished after matching MAP levels. A strong correlation was found between PWV<sub>AW</sub> and PWV<sub>GA</sub> (r = 0.88, and r = 0.97 at the same MAP levels). PWV<sub>GA</sub>, α-angle and their product (α x PWV<sub>GA</sub>) were significantly higher in CVR + patients (8.1 vs. 6.9 m.s<sup>-1</sup>, p < 0.01; 2.6 vs. 1.3 degrees, p < 0.001; 21.8 vs. 8.1 degrees.m.s<sup>-1</sup>, p < 0.001, respectively), with AUC values indicating good predictive capabilities for cardiovascular risk (PWV<sub>GA</sub>: AUC [95%CI] = 0.80 [0.65-0.95]; α-angle: 0.83 [0.69-0.96]; product: 0.86 [0.74-0.97]). Measurement of PWV under GA using carotid and femoral Doppler is a feasible method to continuously assess arterial stiffness under general anaesthesia. Further studies are required to validate the α-angle parameter in different physiological conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":15513,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","volume":" ","pages":"495-503"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-024-01256-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study explores the feasibility of continuous pulse wave velocity (PWV) monitoring during general anaesthesia (GA), particularly in response to blood pressure fluctuations. Our aim is to evaluate whether dynamic PWV can provide new insight to detect cardiovascular risks. From December 2022 to February 2023, continuous carotid and femoral Doppler monitoring was performed on patients scheduled for surgery with GA, to collect PWV data at awakening (PWVAW) and during GA (PWVGA). The study investigated PWV's response to MAP fluctuations using the α-angle, a dynamic stiffness parameter. We evaluated PWV and α-angle efficacy in discriminating between low (CVR-) and high (CVR+) cardiovascular risk patients. Among 43 patients, 41 (95%) had successful PWV measurements. PWVAW was significantly higher than PWVGA (8.1 vs. 7.4 m.s-1, p < 0.0001). This difference vanished after matching MAP levels. A strong correlation was found between PWVAW and PWVGA (r = 0.88, and r = 0.97 at the same MAP levels). PWVGA, α-angle and their product (α x PWVGA) were significantly higher in CVR + patients (8.1 vs. 6.9 m.s-1, p < 0.01; 2.6 vs. 1.3 degrees, p < 0.001; 21.8 vs. 8.1 degrees.m.s-1, p < 0.001, respectively), with AUC values indicating good predictive capabilities for cardiovascular risk (PWVGA: AUC [95%CI] = 0.80 [0.65-0.95]; α-angle: 0.83 [0.69-0.96]; product: 0.86 [0.74-0.97]). Measurement of PWV under GA using carotid and femoral Doppler is a feasible method to continuously assess arterial stiffness under general anaesthesia. Further studies are required to validate the α-angle parameter in different physiological conditions.
本研究探讨了在全身麻醉(GA)期间连续脉搏波速度(PWV)监测的可行性,特别是对血压波动的反应。我们的目的是评估动态PWV是否可以为检测心血管风险提供新的见解。从2022年12月至2023年2月,对计划手术的GA患者进行持续的颈动脉和股骨多普勒监测,收集苏醒时(PWVAW)和GA期间(PWVGA)的PWV数据。采用动态刚度参数α-角研究PWV对MAP波动的响应。我们评价PWV和α-角在区分低(CVR-)和高(CVR+)心血管危险患者中的疗效。43例患者中,41例(95%)成功测量PWV。PWVAW显著高于PWVGA (8.1 vs. 7.4 m.s-1, p AW和PWVGA在相同MAP水平下(r = 0.88, r = 0.97)。CVR +患者的PWVGA、α-角及其乘积(α x PWVGA)显著增高(8.1 vs. 6.9 m.s-1, p -1, p GA: AUC [95%CI] = 0.80 [0.65 ~ 0.95];α-角:0.83 [0.69-0.96];产品:0.86[0.74-0.97])。应用颈动脉和股动脉多普勒测量GA下的PWV是一种持续评估全身麻醉下动脉僵硬度的可行方法。α-角参数在不同生理条件下的有效性有待进一步研究。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing is a clinical journal publishing papers related to technology in the fields of anaesthesia, intensive care medicine, emergency medicine, and peri-operative medicine.
The journal has links with numerous specialist societies, including editorial board representatives from the European Society for Computing and Technology in Anaesthesia and Intensive Care (ESCTAIC), the Society for Technology in Anesthesia (STA), the Society for Complex Acute Illness (SCAI) and the NAVAt (NAVigating towards your Anaestheisa Targets) group.
The journal publishes original papers, narrative and systematic reviews, technological notes, letters to the editor, editorial or commentary papers, and policy statements or guidelines from national or international societies. The journal encourages debate on published papers and technology, including letters commenting on previous publications or technological concerns. The journal occasionally publishes special issues with technological or clinical themes, or reports and abstracts from scientificmeetings. Special issues proposals should be sent to the Editor-in-Chief. Specific details of types of papers, and the clinical and technological content of papers considered within scope can be found in instructions for authors.