Effect of different intranasal dexmedetomidine doses on pediatric postoperative delirium and agitation: network meta-analysis

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS Pediatric Research Pub Date : 2025-03-13 DOI:10.1038/s41390-025-03851-2
Huan Wu, Ping Wu, Liubo Xiang, Qianqian Huang, Yi Xiang, Jianshu Zhang, Zhihao Zhao, Tao Xu
{"title":"Effect of different intranasal dexmedetomidine doses on pediatric postoperative delirium and agitation: network meta-analysis","authors":"Huan Wu, Ping Wu, Liubo Xiang, Qianqian Huang, Yi Xiang, Jianshu Zhang, Zhihao Zhao, Tao Xu","doi":"10.1038/s41390-025-03851-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Our research served to explore the influences of intranasal dexmedetomidine (DEX) at different doses on agitation, delirium, and other complications among children undergoing general anesthesia. A systematic search was executed in EMBASE, Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Web of Science, from the establishment of the database until February 12, 2024. The data analytics was implemented through R software and STATA version 16.0. The final analysis incorporated 15 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) containing 1965 pediatric participants in total. The findings uncovered that relative to normal saline (NS), intranasal DEX at doses of 1 μg/kg [RR = 0.31, 95%CI = (0.17, 0.56)], 1.5 μg/kg [RR = 0.28, 95%CI = (0.09, 0.85)], and 2 μg/kg [RR = 0.18, 95%CI = (0.08, 0.36)] remarkably reduced the prevalence of post-anesthetic emergence agitation (EA) in children, with the 2 μg/kg dose demonstrating the highest effectiveness (SUCRA = 0.8997). Additionally, DEX at doses of 1 μg/kg [MD = −3.36, 95%CI = (−6.46, −0.44)] and 2 μg/kg [MD = −2.59, 95%CI = (−5.17, −0.32)] effectively reduced the Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium (PAED) score, with the 1 μg/kg dose ranking as the most efficacious according to SUCRA analysis (SUCRA = 0.8557). DEX prominently reduces the prevalence of emergence agitation and delirium. At doses of 2 μg/kg and 1 μg/kg, DEX effectively lowers the incidence of EA and PAED scores.","PeriodicalId":19829,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Research","volume":"98 4","pages":"1266-1275"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41390-025-03851-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Our research served to explore the influences of intranasal dexmedetomidine (DEX) at different doses on agitation, delirium, and other complications among children undergoing general anesthesia. A systematic search was executed in EMBASE, Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Web of Science, from the establishment of the database until February 12, 2024. The data analytics was implemented through R software and STATA version 16.0. The final analysis incorporated 15 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) containing 1965 pediatric participants in total. The findings uncovered that relative to normal saline (NS), intranasal DEX at doses of 1 μg/kg [RR = 0.31, 95%CI = (0.17, 0.56)], 1.5 μg/kg [RR = 0.28, 95%CI = (0.09, 0.85)], and 2 μg/kg [RR = 0.18, 95%CI = (0.08, 0.36)] remarkably reduced the prevalence of post-anesthetic emergence agitation (EA) in children, with the 2 μg/kg dose demonstrating the highest effectiveness (SUCRA = 0.8997). Additionally, DEX at doses of 1 μg/kg [MD = −3.36, 95%CI = (−6.46, −0.44)] and 2 μg/kg [MD = −2.59, 95%CI = (−5.17, −0.32)] effectively reduced the Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium (PAED) score, with the 1 μg/kg dose ranking as the most efficacious according to SUCRA analysis (SUCRA = 0.8557). DEX prominently reduces the prevalence of emergence agitation and delirium. At doses of 2 μg/kg and 1 μg/kg, DEX effectively lowers the incidence of EA and PAED scores.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
鼻内不同剂量右美托咪定对小儿术后谵妄和躁动的影响:网络荟萃分析。
研究目的我们的研究旨在探讨不同剂量的鼻内右美托咪定(DEX)对接受全身麻醉的儿童的躁动、谵妄和其他并发症的影响:方法:在 EMBASE、Cochrane Library、PubMed 和 Web of Science 中进行了系统检索,检索时间为数据库建立后至 2024 年 2 月 12 日。数据分析通过 R 软件和 STATA 16.0 版本进行:最终分析纳入了 15 项随机对照试验(RCT),共有 1965 名儿科参与者。研究结果发现,相对于正常生理盐水(NS),鼻内注射 DEX 的剂量为 1 μg/kg [RR = 0.31, 95%CI = (0.17, 0.56)]、1.5 μg/kg [RR = 0.28, 95%CI = (0.09, 0.85)]和 2 μg/kg [RR = 0.18, 95%CI = (0.08, 0.36)]可显著降低儿童麻醉后出现躁动(EA)的发生率,其中 2 μg/kg 剂量的有效性最高(SUCRA = 0.8997)。此外,根据SUCRA分析,1微克/千克[MD = -3.36,95%CI = (-6.46, -0.44)]和2微克/千克[MD = -2.59,95%CI = (-5.17, -0.32)]剂量的DEX可有效降低小儿麻醉后谵妄(PAED)评分,其中1微克/千克剂量的DEX疗效最佳(SUCRA = 0.8557):结论:DEX能显著降低出院躁动和谵妄的发生率。结论:DEX能显著降低出院躁动和谵妄的发生率,剂量为2 μg/kg和1 μg/kg时,DEX能有效降低EA发生率和PAED评分:我们的研究试图评估鼻内注射右美托咪定(DEX)的不同剂量对接受全身麻醉的儿童术后躁动和谵妄发生率的影响。研究阐明了不同剂量的DEX对减少术后躁动、PAED评分和术后镇痛药需求的影响,为临床实践中选择最佳剂量策略提供了宝贵的指导。研究结果支持在选择不同剂量的DEX时考虑儿童的个体差异,以提供更合适的镇静和镇痛方案,从而提高术后恢复质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatric Research
Pediatric Research 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
5.60%
发文量
473
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Research publishes original papers, invited reviews, and commentaries on the etiologies of children''s diseases and disorders of development, extending from molecular biology to epidemiology. Use of model organisms and in vitro techniques relevant to developmental biology and medicine are acceptable, as are translational human studies
期刊最新文献
Clinical characteristics of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder with sarcopenia in children: a case-control study. The effect of inhaled nitric oxide on splanchnic perfusion in a neonatal piglet model. MiR-182-5p, miR-122-5p and hsa-piR-28004 as indicators of disease and treatment in pediatric familial hypercholesterolemia. Predicting Continuous Kidney Support Therapy (CKST) time: the role of urine NGAL in guiding CKST duration and discontinuation. Public participation in child health: the Healthy Infants and Children Clinical Research Program (HICCUP).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1