The Fossil Fuel Non-Proliferation Treaty: what it is, its importance for health, and why Australia should endorse it

IF 8.5 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Medical Journal of Australia Pub Date : 2025-03-13 DOI:10.5694/mja2.52610
Philomena Colagiuri, Jake TW Williams, Paul J Beggs, Ying Zhang
{"title":"The Fossil Fuel Non-Proliferation Treaty: what it is, its importance for health, and why Australia should endorse it","authors":"Philomena Colagiuri,&nbsp;Jake TW Williams,&nbsp;Paul J Beggs,&nbsp;Ying Zhang","doi":"10.5694/mja2.52610","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Climate change — driven primarily by the extraction and burning of fossil fuels — is profoundly affecting our health. Some impacts are direct and immediate, such as from worsening heatwaves and extreme weather events.<span><sup>1</sup></span> Others are indirect and more complex, including changes to the social determinants of health and the distribution of infectious diseases, and increased water and food insecurity. The risks associated with climate change are not being felt equally, and it is the most disadvantaged people and countries (who have generally contributed the least to climate change) that are disproportionately exposed and vulnerable.<span><sup>2</sup></span></p><p>The 29th Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), COP29, was recently held in Baku, Azerbaijan. COP is the UNFCCC's decision-making body, most notably responsible for the Paris Agreement, which aims to limit global warming to 1.5°C or well below 2°C.<span><sup>3</sup></span> Azerbaijan is a major oil and gas producer with plans for expansion, which contradicts the urgent need to phase out fossil fuels in accordance with the Paris Agreement.<span><sup>4</sup></span> This is the third consecutive year that COP has been hosted by a country with significant fossil fuel interests, and fossil fuel lobbyists at COP29 outnumbered delegates from the ten most climate-vulnerable countries combined.<span><sup>5</sup></span> Given the prominence of fossil fuel producers in the UNFCCC process, a further mechanism is needed to manage the phasing out of fossil fuels.</p><p>Achieving the goals of the Paris Agreement requires rapid reductions in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in all sectors.<span><sup>6</sup></span> However, current mitigation plans make it likely that warming will exceed 1.5°C this century.<span><sup>6</sup></span> To prevent the most devastating and inequitable health impacts, we must rapidly reduce GHG emissions — and phase out fossil fuels.</p><p>Based on the extensive evidence of the health impacts of climate change, and the health benefits of phasing out fossil fuel extraction and use, this perspective article argues that Australia should endorse the Fossil Fuel Non-Proliferation Treaty (FFNPT) as an act of public health. We outline the health impacts of climate change, discuss what the FFNPT seeks to achieve, its alignment with public health, and how Australia's support for the treaty could strengthen its bid to host COP31.</p><p>The world is not on track to meet the goals of the Paris Agreement. <i>The sixth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change</i>, released in 2023, found that GHG emissions are the highest they have ever been and that, in the last decade (2011–2020), the mean global surface temperature reached 1.1°C above the 1850–1900 baseline.<span><sup>6</sup></span> The 2023 annual mean temperature hit a record high of 1.45°C above pre-industrial times.<span><sup>7</sup></span> This is having devastating impacts on human health.</p><p>The Lancet Countdown tracks the health impacts of climate change, highlighting in its most recent report that the threat to health is unprecedented, with ten out of 15 climate-related health indicators reaching record levels, such as heat-related mortality, heat stress during outdoor physical activity and work, and poorer quality sleep.<span><sup>7</sup></span> There are also health impacts from increases in extreme weather events, the spread of infectious diseases, and food insecurity.<span><sup>7</sup></span> The Oceania report of the Lancet Countdown, published in the <i>MJA</i>, and the World Health Organization (WHO) COP29 report on climate change and health, reached the same conclusion as the global Lancet Countdown report.<span><sup>1, 8</sup></span> In Australia, rising temperatures have led to more frequent, intense and prolonged heatwaves, which pose serious health risks. Heatwaves are estimated to have caused more deaths in Australia since 1900 than all other natural hazards combined.<span><sup>9</sup></span></p><p>The FFNPT is a proposed international agreement to stop the global expansion of new coal, oil and gas projects and equitably phase out existing fossil fuel infrastructure, complementing the Paris Agreement.<span><sup>10-12</sup></span> The FFNPT is based on three pillars: non-proliferation, fair phase-out, and just transition. The non-proliferation pillar aims to prevent the expansion of fossil fuel production, potentially through a global public register to track fossil fuel reserves and regular assessments by bodies such as the International Energy Agency.<span><sup>13</sup></span> The fair phase-out pillar focuses on reducing fossil fuel production while minimising negative impacts on economies and communities, such as through extraction limits and eliminating fossil fuel subsidies.<span><sup>11</sup></span></p><p>The just transition pillar, grounded in the Common but Differentiated Responsibilities and Respective Capabilities principle, calls for countries with the capacity and historical responsibility for the causes of climate change, and who have benefited most from fossil fuels, to lead the transition.<span><sup>14</sup></span> The treaty would recognise the current reliance of low income countries on fossil fuels for their economic development and seek to provide financial and technical support to help them transition to low carbon energy. This assistance could include measures such as job creation, compensation for displaced workers, and regional development funds.<span><sup>15</sup></span> A global transition fund could provide this support, with funds coming from redirected fossil fuel subsidies or a global carbon tax.<span><sup>11</sup></span> A just transition must also address the extraction of critical minerals needed for renewable infrastructure, ensuring that the health inequities of workers and communities near fossil fuel extraction sites are not repeated at critical mineral extraction sites.<span><sup>16</sup></span></p><p>The treaty is currently supported by 16 nation states (including 11 Pacific Island countries) and endorsed by more than 300 health institutions, including the WHO.<span><sup>10</sup></span> The Australian Government does not currently support the FFNPT, which is likely influenced by Australia's position as one of the world's largest exporters of coal and gas.<span><sup>1</sup></span></p><p>At COP29, Australia said it would commit to opening no new coal power plants in its next Nationally Determined Contribution, due to be released in 2025.<span><sup>17</sup></span> Australia's ageing fleet of coal-fired power plants will not be replaced on retirement, as clean energy sources — primarily wind, solar and storage — are now more cost-effective. As a high income country that has benefited from fossil fuels for decades, Australia has the resources and responsibility to lead the clean energy transition and support low income nations in their own transitions.</p><p>Fossil fuels are the primary driver of climate change, contributing to 67% of global GHG emissions.<span><sup>7</sup></span> Fossil fuel combustion releases GHGs, which trap heat in the atmosphere, causing global warming. Major fossil fuel companies are expanding their production plans, putting the world on track to exceed emissions compatible with 1.5°C of warming by 189% by 2040.<span><sup>7</sup></span> This growth in fossil fuel production undermines the Paris Agreement and endangers human health and survival.</p><p>Fossil fuel projects also contribute to disease by contaminating air and waterways with harmful chemicals. Indigenous populations, such as Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, face significantly higher health burdens from these exposures, due to their proximity to extraction sites and higher rates of pre-existing health conditions such as respiratory and cardiovascular diseases.<span><sup>18, 19</sup></span> These communities are also among the most severely affected by the climate crisis.<span><sup>20</sup></span> Without careful planning and implementation, climate change adaptation and mitigation strategies may inadvertently deepen existing inequities, further marginalising already vulnerable populations.<span><sup>21</sup></span></p><p>Reducing fossil fuel extraction is critical not only for mitigating climate change but also for reducing the health risks associated with fossil fuel use. Global health leaders have asserted the need to phase out fossil fuels “in the name of health”.<span><sup>22</sup></span> Health organisations are advocating for fossil fuels to be treated as a public health issue, drawing parallels between the climate crisis and the tobacco epidemic.<span><sup>23</sup></span> As with tobacco companies, coal, oil and gas companies have been aware of the dangers of their products for decades, yet have actively sought to downplay these risks and create public uncertainty.<span><sup>24</sup></span> Similar to the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, the proposed FFNPT would be an evidence-based international agreement to regulate substances — coal, oil and gas — that are widely recognised as harmful to human health.<span><sup>8, 25, 26</sup></span></p><p>Shifting from fossil fuels to renewable energy sources that generate little to no air pollution and have significantly smaller environmental impacts would improve health outcomes. Strengthening global efforts to achieve the Paris Agreement goals can prevent 1.18 million annual deaths from air pollution alone.<span><sup>27</sup></span> Economic savings from avoided climate change-related illnesses can be reinvested into health initiatives, further enhancing public health. Although technologies such as carbon capture and storage have been proposed to mitigate the impacts of fossil fuels, such technologies would delay the urgent transition to clean energy required to reduce emissions.<span><sup>15</sup></span> Even with carbon capture and storage, fossil fuel extraction and combustion will continue to harm public health.</p><p>For these reasons, we view endorsement of the FFNPT as important for promoting public health. Health care professionals should take leadership in this effort, as demonstrated by the Royal Australasian College of Physicians’ commitment to eliminate all financial holdings in fossil fuels.<span><sup>28</sup></span> Supporting this treaty is not just an environmental imperative; it is a commitment to ensuring equitable health outcomes now and in the future.</p><p>With Australia tipped to co-host COP31 in 2026 with Pacific Island countries, many of which support the FFNPT, there is an opportunity to demonstrate solidarity with our Pacific neighbours. After years of climate change inaction under the former Coalition government, the current Labor government has legislated its commitment to cutting emissions by 43% by 2030, aiming for net-zero emissions by 2050.<span><sup>29</sup></span> Australia has also increased its share of renewable energy in electricity production from 17% in 2018 to 36% in 2022, with a goal of 82% to come from renewable sources by 2030.<span><sup>1</sup></span></p><p>However, recent analysis suggests that Australia needs to achieve an approximate 70% reduction in emissions by 2030 to reach net zero by 2050.<span><sup>30</sup></span> Pacific Island nations have urged Australia to strengthen its climate ambitions, with some Pacific leaders opposed to co-hosting COP31 without an Australian pledge to end fossil fuel subsidies and halt fossil fuel projects.<span><sup>31</sup></span> By endorsing the FFNPT, Australia could signal its readiness to take meaningful action against climate change and avoid its worst health impacts.</p><p>Endorsing the FFNPT is more than just a climate strategy for Australia; it represents a vital step towards advancing global health justice and fostering regional solidarity.</p><p>Open access publishing facilitated by The University of Sydney, as part of the Wiley - The University of Sydney agreement via the Council of Australian University Librarians.</p><p>Philomena Colagiuri received funding from the Climate and Health Foundation for her role as Lancet Countdown Oceania Fellow. The Climate and Health Foundation also provided funding for her to attend COP29 in Baku, Azerbaijan in 2024 (airfare, accommodation, daily stipend). Jake Williams received funding from the Climate and Health Foundation for his role as Lancet Countdown Oceania Fellow. The Climate and Health Foundation also provided funding for him to attend COP29 in Baku, Azerbaijan in 2024. Jake Williams received funding from the Wiser Healthcare Research Collaboration for the 2024 EMCR Seed Grant, and funding from HEAL (Healthy Environments And Lives) National Research Network (National Health and Medical Research Council Grant No. 2008937) for the 2024 Travel Award and 2023 Travel Award. Paul Beggs received funding from the Lancet Countdown for in-kind support (payment of airfare, accommodation etc.) to attend the Lancet Countdown Annual Meeting, London, 2024. He also received funding from the Climate and Health Foundation for in-kind support (payment of airfare, accommodation etc.) to attend UNFCCC COP28, Dubai, 2023. Paul Beggs is the Director of Oceania Regional Centre for the Lancet Countdown. Ying Zhang has received funding from the Climate and Health Foundation for in-kind support (payment of airfare, accommodation etc.) to attend UNFCCC COP28, Dubai, 2023. Ying Zhang is a Co-Director of Oceania Regional Centre for the Lancet Countdown and is on the Editorial Board for the <i>Journal of Climate Change and Health</i>.</p><p>Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.</p>","PeriodicalId":18214,"journal":{"name":"Medical Journal of Australia","volume":"222 6","pages":"297-299"},"PeriodicalIF":8.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.5694/mja2.52610","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Journal of Australia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.5694/mja2.52610","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Climate change — driven primarily by the extraction and burning of fossil fuels — is profoundly affecting our health. Some impacts are direct and immediate, such as from worsening heatwaves and extreme weather events.1 Others are indirect and more complex, including changes to the social determinants of health and the distribution of infectious diseases, and increased water and food insecurity. The risks associated with climate change are not being felt equally, and it is the most disadvantaged people and countries (who have generally contributed the least to climate change) that are disproportionately exposed and vulnerable.2

The 29th Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), COP29, was recently held in Baku, Azerbaijan. COP is the UNFCCC's decision-making body, most notably responsible for the Paris Agreement, which aims to limit global warming to 1.5°C or well below 2°C.3 Azerbaijan is a major oil and gas producer with plans for expansion, which contradicts the urgent need to phase out fossil fuels in accordance with the Paris Agreement.4 This is the third consecutive year that COP has been hosted by a country with significant fossil fuel interests, and fossil fuel lobbyists at COP29 outnumbered delegates from the ten most climate-vulnerable countries combined.5 Given the prominence of fossil fuel producers in the UNFCCC process, a further mechanism is needed to manage the phasing out of fossil fuels.

Achieving the goals of the Paris Agreement requires rapid reductions in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in all sectors.6 However, current mitigation plans make it likely that warming will exceed 1.5°C this century.6 To prevent the most devastating and inequitable health impacts, we must rapidly reduce GHG emissions — and phase out fossil fuels.

Based on the extensive evidence of the health impacts of climate change, and the health benefits of phasing out fossil fuel extraction and use, this perspective article argues that Australia should endorse the Fossil Fuel Non-Proliferation Treaty (FFNPT) as an act of public health. We outline the health impacts of climate change, discuss what the FFNPT seeks to achieve, its alignment with public health, and how Australia's support for the treaty could strengthen its bid to host COP31.

The world is not on track to meet the goals of the Paris Agreement. The sixth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, released in 2023, found that GHG emissions are the highest they have ever been and that, in the last decade (2011–2020), the mean global surface temperature reached 1.1°C above the 1850–1900 baseline.6 The 2023 annual mean temperature hit a record high of 1.45°C above pre-industrial times.7 This is having devastating impacts on human health.

The Lancet Countdown tracks the health impacts of climate change, highlighting in its most recent report that the threat to health is unprecedented, with ten out of 15 climate-related health indicators reaching record levels, such as heat-related mortality, heat stress during outdoor physical activity and work, and poorer quality sleep.7 There are also health impacts from increases in extreme weather events, the spread of infectious diseases, and food insecurity.7 The Oceania report of the Lancet Countdown, published in the MJA, and the World Health Organization (WHO) COP29 report on climate change and health, reached the same conclusion as the global Lancet Countdown report.1, 8 In Australia, rising temperatures have led to more frequent, intense and prolonged heatwaves, which pose serious health risks. Heatwaves are estimated to have caused more deaths in Australia since 1900 than all other natural hazards combined.9

The FFNPT is a proposed international agreement to stop the global expansion of new coal, oil and gas projects and equitably phase out existing fossil fuel infrastructure, complementing the Paris Agreement.10-12 The FFNPT is based on three pillars: non-proliferation, fair phase-out, and just transition. The non-proliferation pillar aims to prevent the expansion of fossil fuel production, potentially through a global public register to track fossil fuel reserves and regular assessments by bodies such as the International Energy Agency.13 The fair phase-out pillar focuses on reducing fossil fuel production while minimising negative impacts on economies and communities, such as through extraction limits and eliminating fossil fuel subsidies.11

The just transition pillar, grounded in the Common but Differentiated Responsibilities and Respective Capabilities principle, calls for countries with the capacity and historical responsibility for the causes of climate change, and who have benefited most from fossil fuels, to lead the transition.14 The treaty would recognise the current reliance of low income countries on fossil fuels for their economic development and seek to provide financial and technical support to help them transition to low carbon energy. This assistance could include measures such as job creation, compensation for displaced workers, and regional development funds.15 A global transition fund could provide this support, with funds coming from redirected fossil fuel subsidies or a global carbon tax.11 A just transition must also address the extraction of critical minerals needed for renewable infrastructure, ensuring that the health inequities of workers and communities near fossil fuel extraction sites are not repeated at critical mineral extraction sites.16

The treaty is currently supported by 16 nation states (including 11 Pacific Island countries) and endorsed by more than 300 health institutions, including the WHO.10 The Australian Government does not currently support the FFNPT, which is likely influenced by Australia's position as one of the world's largest exporters of coal and gas.1

At COP29, Australia said it would commit to opening no new coal power plants in its next Nationally Determined Contribution, due to be released in 2025.17 Australia's ageing fleet of coal-fired power plants will not be replaced on retirement, as clean energy sources — primarily wind, solar and storage — are now more cost-effective. As a high income country that has benefited from fossil fuels for decades, Australia has the resources and responsibility to lead the clean energy transition and support low income nations in their own transitions.

Fossil fuels are the primary driver of climate change, contributing to 67% of global GHG emissions.7 Fossil fuel combustion releases GHGs, which trap heat in the atmosphere, causing global warming. Major fossil fuel companies are expanding their production plans, putting the world on track to exceed emissions compatible with 1.5°C of warming by 189% by 2040.7 This growth in fossil fuel production undermines the Paris Agreement and endangers human health and survival.

Fossil fuel projects also contribute to disease by contaminating air and waterways with harmful chemicals. Indigenous populations, such as Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, face significantly higher health burdens from these exposures, due to their proximity to extraction sites and higher rates of pre-existing health conditions such as respiratory and cardiovascular diseases.18, 19 These communities are also among the most severely affected by the climate crisis.20 Without careful planning and implementation, climate change adaptation and mitigation strategies may inadvertently deepen existing inequities, further marginalising already vulnerable populations.21

Reducing fossil fuel extraction is critical not only for mitigating climate change but also for reducing the health risks associated with fossil fuel use. Global health leaders have asserted the need to phase out fossil fuels “in the name of health”.22 Health organisations are advocating for fossil fuels to be treated as a public health issue, drawing parallels between the climate crisis and the tobacco epidemic.23 As with tobacco companies, coal, oil and gas companies have been aware of the dangers of their products for decades, yet have actively sought to downplay these risks and create public uncertainty.24 Similar to the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, the proposed FFNPT would be an evidence-based international agreement to regulate substances — coal, oil and gas — that are widely recognised as harmful to human health.8, 25, 26

Shifting from fossil fuels to renewable energy sources that generate little to no air pollution and have significantly smaller environmental impacts would improve health outcomes. Strengthening global efforts to achieve the Paris Agreement goals can prevent 1.18 million annual deaths from air pollution alone.27 Economic savings from avoided climate change-related illnesses can be reinvested into health initiatives, further enhancing public health. Although technologies such as carbon capture and storage have been proposed to mitigate the impacts of fossil fuels, such technologies would delay the urgent transition to clean energy required to reduce emissions.15 Even with carbon capture and storage, fossil fuel extraction and combustion will continue to harm public health.

For these reasons, we view endorsement of the FFNPT as important for promoting public health. Health care professionals should take leadership in this effort, as demonstrated by the Royal Australasian College of Physicians’ commitment to eliminate all financial holdings in fossil fuels.28 Supporting this treaty is not just an environmental imperative; it is a commitment to ensuring equitable health outcomes now and in the future.

With Australia tipped to co-host COP31 in 2026 with Pacific Island countries, many of which support the FFNPT, there is an opportunity to demonstrate solidarity with our Pacific neighbours. After years of climate change inaction under the former Coalition government, the current Labor government has legislated its commitment to cutting emissions by 43% by 2030, aiming for net-zero emissions by 2050.29 Australia has also increased its share of renewable energy in electricity production from 17% in 2018 to 36% in 2022, with a goal of 82% to come from renewable sources by 2030.1

However, recent analysis suggests that Australia needs to achieve an approximate 70% reduction in emissions by 2030 to reach net zero by 2050.30 Pacific Island nations have urged Australia to strengthen its climate ambitions, with some Pacific leaders opposed to co-hosting COP31 without an Australian pledge to end fossil fuel subsidies and halt fossil fuel projects.31 By endorsing the FFNPT, Australia could signal its readiness to take meaningful action against climate change and avoid its worst health impacts.

Endorsing the FFNPT is more than just a climate strategy for Australia; it represents a vital step towards advancing global health justice and fostering regional solidarity.

Open access publishing facilitated by The University of Sydney, as part of the Wiley - The University of Sydney agreement via the Council of Australian University Librarians.

Philomena Colagiuri received funding from the Climate and Health Foundation for her role as Lancet Countdown Oceania Fellow. The Climate and Health Foundation also provided funding for her to attend COP29 in Baku, Azerbaijan in 2024 (airfare, accommodation, daily stipend). Jake Williams received funding from the Climate and Health Foundation for his role as Lancet Countdown Oceania Fellow. The Climate and Health Foundation also provided funding for him to attend COP29 in Baku, Azerbaijan in 2024. Jake Williams received funding from the Wiser Healthcare Research Collaboration for the 2024 EMCR Seed Grant, and funding from HEAL (Healthy Environments And Lives) National Research Network (National Health and Medical Research Council Grant No. 2008937) for the 2024 Travel Award and 2023 Travel Award. Paul Beggs received funding from the Lancet Countdown for in-kind support (payment of airfare, accommodation etc.) to attend the Lancet Countdown Annual Meeting, London, 2024. He also received funding from the Climate and Health Foundation for in-kind support (payment of airfare, accommodation etc.) to attend UNFCCC COP28, Dubai, 2023. Paul Beggs is the Director of Oceania Regional Centre for the Lancet Countdown. Ying Zhang has received funding from the Climate and Health Foundation for in-kind support (payment of airfare, accommodation etc.) to attend UNFCCC COP28, Dubai, 2023. Ying Zhang is a Co-Director of Oceania Regional Centre for the Lancet Countdown and is on the Editorial Board for the Journal of Climate Change and Health.

Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《不扩散化石燃料条约》:它是什么,它对健康的重要性,以及为什么澳大利亚应该支持它。
气候变化——主要是由化石燃料的开采和燃烧驱动的——正在深刻地影响着我们的健康。有些影响是直接的、立竿见影的,比如日益恶化的热浪和极端天气事件其他影响则是间接的和更为复杂的,包括健康和传染病分布的社会决定因素的变化,以及水和粮食不安全状况的加剧。与气候变化相关的风险并没有被平等地感受到,最弱势的人群和国家(他们通常对气候变化的贡献最小)受到了不成比例的暴露和脆弱。《联合国气候变化框架公约》第29次缔约方大会(COP29)近日在阿塞拜疆巴库举行。缔约方会议是《联合国气候变化框架公约》的决策机构,主要负责制定旨在将全球变暖控制在1.5°C或远低于2°C的《巴黎协定》阿塞拜疆是一个主要的石油和天然气生产国,并有扩张计划,这与根据《巴黎协定》逐步淘汰化石燃料的迫切需要相矛盾。4这是缔约方会议连续第三年由具有重要化石燃料利益的国家主办,第29届缔约方会议上的化石燃料游说者人数超过了十个最易受气候影响国家的代表人数总和鉴于化石燃料生产商在《联合国气候变化框架公约》进程中的突出地位,需要建立进一步的机制来管理化石燃料的逐步淘汰。实现《巴黎协定》的目标需要所有部门迅速减少温室气体排放然而,目前的减缓计划使本世纪变暖有可能超过1.5°C为了防止最具破坏性和不公平的健康影响,我们必须迅速减少温室气体排放,并逐步淘汰化石燃料。基于气候变化对健康影响的广泛证据,以及逐步淘汰化石燃料的开采和使用对健康的好处,这篇前瞻性文章认为,澳大利亚应该批准《不扩散化石燃料条约》(FFNPT),将其作为一项公共卫生行为。我们概述了气候变化对健康的影响,讨论了《不扩散核武器条约》寻求实现的目标,它与公共卫生的一致性,以及澳大利亚对该条约的支持如何加强其申办第三十一届联合国气候变化大会的努力。世界没有走上实现《巴黎协定》目标的轨道。政府间气候变化专门委员会于2023年发布的第六次评估报告发现,温室气体排放量达到了有史以来的最高水平,在过去十年(2011-2020年)中,全球平均地表温度比1850-1900年的基线高出1.1°C2023年的年平均气温创历史新高,比工业化前高出1.45摄氏度这对人类健康产生了毁灭性的影响。《柳叶刀倒计时》追踪了气候变化对健康的影响,在其最新报告中强调,对健康的威胁是前所未有的,15项与气候有关的健康指标中有10项达到创纪录水平,如与热有关的死亡率、户外体育活动和工作期间的热应激以及睡眠质量较差极端天气事件的增加、传染病的传播和粮食不安全也对健康造成了影响在MJA上发表的《柳叶刀倒计时》大洋洲报告和世界卫生组织(世卫组织)第29次缔约方会议关于气候变化与健康的报告得出了与《柳叶刀倒计时》全球报告相同的结论。在澳大利亚,气温上升导致热浪更频繁、更强烈、持续时间更长,这对健康构成了严重威胁。据估计,自1900年以来,热浪在澳大利亚造成的死亡人数超过了其他所有自然灾害的总和。《不扩散核武器条约》是对《巴黎协定》的补充,旨在阻止新的煤炭、石油和天然气项目在全球扩张,公平淘汰现有化石燃料基础设施。《不扩散核武器条约》基于三个支柱:不扩散、公平淘汰和公正过渡。不扩散支柱旨在防止化石燃料生产的扩大,可能通过全球公开登记来跟踪化石燃料储量,并由国际能源署等机构进行定期评估。13公平逐步淘汰支柱侧重于减少化石燃料生产,同时尽量减少对经济和社区的负面影响,例如通过开采限制和取消化石燃料补贴。11 .公正转型支柱以共同但有区别的责任和各自能力原则为基础,呼吁对气候变化原因负有能力和历史责任的国家以及从化石燃料中获益最多的国家领导转型。 14 .该条约将承认低收入国家目前经济发展对化石燃料的依赖,并寻求提供资金和技术支持,帮助它们向低碳能源转型。这种援助可包括创造就业机会、补偿流离失所工人和区域发展基金等措施一个全球过渡基金可以提供这种支持,其资金来自重新定向的化石燃料补贴或全球碳税公正的过渡还必须解决可再生基础设施所需的关键矿物的开采问题,确保化石燃料开采地点附近的工人和社区的健康不平等现象不会在关键的矿物开采地点重演。16该条约目前得到16个民族国家(包括11个太平洋岛国)的支持,并得到包括世卫组织在内的300多个卫生机构的认可。10澳大利亚政府目前不支持《不扩散核武器条约》,这可能受到澳大利亚作为世界上最大的煤炭和天然气出口国之一的地位的影响。在第29届联合国气候变化大会上,澳大利亚表示,它将承诺在2025年发布的下一个国家自主贡献中不再新建燃煤电厂。澳大利亚老化的燃煤电厂在退役后将不会被取代,因为清洁能源——主要是风能、太阳能和储能——现在更具成本效益。作为一个几十年来一直受益于化石燃料的高收入国家,澳大利亚有资源也有责任领导清洁能源转型,并支持低收入国家自己的转型。化石燃料是气候变化的主要驱动因素,占全球温室气体排放量的67%化石燃料燃烧释放出温室气体,将热量困在大气中,导致全球变暖。主要化石燃料公司正在扩大其生产计划,使世界走上到2040年超过1.5°C的排放量的189%的轨道。化石燃料生产的增长破坏了《巴黎协定》,危及人类的健康和生存。化石燃料项目还会因有害化学物质污染空气和水道而导致疾病。土著居民和托雷斯海峡岛民等土著居民因接触这些物质而面临的健康负担要高得多,因为他们靠近采掘地点,而且患有呼吸系统和心血管疾病等先前健康状况的比率较高。这些社区也是受气候危机影响最严重的地区如果不认真规划和执行,气候变化适应和减缓战略可能会在不经意间加深现有的不平等现象,使本已脆弱的人口进一步边缘化。21 .减少化石燃料开采不仅对减缓气候变化至关重要,而且对减少与使用化石燃料有关的健康风险也至关重要。22 .全球卫生领导人声称,有必要“以健康的名义”逐步淘汰化石燃料卫生组织正在倡导将化石燃料作为一个公共卫生问题来对待,并将气候危机与烟草流行相提并论与烟草公司一样,煤炭、石油和天然气公司几十年来一直意识到其产品的危险,但却积极寻求淡化这些风险,并制造公众的不确定性与《世界卫生组织烟草控制框架公约》类似,拟议的《不扩散核武器条约》将是一项以证据为基础的国际协定,以管制被广泛认为对人类健康有害的物质——煤炭、石油和天然气。8,25,26从化石燃料转向产生很少或不产生空气污染且对环境影响小得多的可再生能源将改善健康结果。27 .加强全球努力以实现《巴黎协定》的目标,每年仅空气污染就可防止118万人死亡可将避免的与气候变化有关的疾病节省下来的经济资金再投资于卫生举措,进一步加强公共卫生。虽然碳捕获和储存等技术已被提出以减轻化石燃料的影响,但这些技术将推迟向减少排放所需的清洁能源的紧急过渡即使有了碳捕获和储存,化石燃料的开采和燃烧仍将继续危害公众健康。由于这些原因,我们认为核可《不扩散核武器条约》对促进公共卫生很重要。28 .卫生保健专业人员应在这方面发挥领导作用,澳大利亚皇家医师学院承诺消除对化石燃料的所有金融控股就证明了这一点支持这项条约不仅是环境方面的当务之急;这是对确保现在和将来公平的卫生结果的承诺。 由于澳大利亚有望与太平洋岛国共同主办2026年的第31次缔约方会议,其中许多国家支持《不扩散核武器条约》,因此有机会展示我们与太平洋邻国的团结。在前联合政府多年来对气候变化无所作为之后,现任工党政府已立法承诺到2030年将排放量减少43%,目标是到2050年实现净零排放。澳大利亚还将可再生能源在电力生产中的份额从2018年的17%提高到2022年的36%,目标是到2030年可再生能源占比达到82%。最近的分析表明,澳大利亚需要在2030年之前实现约70%的减排,才能在2050年之前实现净零排放。太平洋岛国敦促澳大利亚加强其气候目标,一些太平洋领导人反对在澳大利亚承诺停止化石燃料补贴和停止化石燃料项目的情况下共同主办COP31通过核可《不扩散核武器条约》,澳大利亚可以表明它准备采取有意义的行动应对气候变化,避免其对健康的最严重影响。对澳大利亚来说,批准《不扩散核武器条约》不仅仅是一项气候战略;这是朝着促进全球卫生正义和促进区域团结迈出的重要一步。开放获取出版由悉尼大学促进,作为Wiley -悉尼大学协议的一部分,通过澳大利亚大学图书馆员理事会。Philomena Colagiuri作为《柳叶刀》倒计时大洋洲研究员获得了气候与健康基金会的资助。气候与健康基金会还资助她参加2024年在阿塞拜疆巴库举行的第29届联合国气候变化大会(COP29)(机票、住宿、日常津贴)。杰克·威廉姆斯获得了气候与健康基金会的资助,担任《柳叶刀》倒计时大洋洲研究员。气候与健康基金会还资助他参加2024年在阿塞拜疆巴库举行的第29届联合国气候变化大会。Jake Williams获得了Wiser医疗保健研究合作组织2024年EMCR种子基金的资助,以及HEAL(健康环境和生命)国家研究网络(国家卫生和医学研究委员会拨款号2008937)2024年旅行奖和2023年旅行奖的资助。Paul Beggs获得了柳叶刀倒计时的实物资助(支付机票、住宿等),参加2024年在伦敦举行的柳叶刀倒计时年会。他还获得了气候与健康基金会的实物资助(支付机票、住宿等),以参加2023年在迪拜举行的《联合国气候变化框架公约》第28次缔约方会议。保罗·贝格斯(Paul Beggs)是《柳叶刀倒计时》大洋洲区域中心主任。张颖获得气候与健康基金会的实物资助(机票、住宿费等),参加2023年在迪拜举行的联合国气候变化框架公约第28届缔约方会议。张颖,《柳叶刀》倒计时大洋洲区域中心联合主任,《气候变化与健康杂志》编辑委员会成员。不是委托;外部同行评审。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Journal of Australia
Medical Journal of Australia 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
410
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Medical Journal of Australia (MJA) stands as Australia's foremost general medical journal, leading the dissemination of high-quality research and commentary to shape health policy and influence medical practices within the country. Under the leadership of Professor Virginia Barbour, the expert editorial team at MJA is dedicated to providing authors with a constructive and collaborative peer-review and publication process. Established in 1914, the MJA has evolved into a modern journal that upholds its founding values, maintaining a commitment to supporting the medical profession by delivering high-quality and pertinent information essential to medical practice.
期刊最新文献
Uptake and Costs of the 60-Day Dispensing Policy for Antihypertensive Medicines in Australia: A Mixed Methods Study. Cervical Cancer Elimination in Australia and the Asia Pacific: Progress and Barriers. Standardising Gender and Sex Data Collection in Clinical Care and Research. Paediatric Injuries and E-Mobility Devices: A Call for Regulatory Reform in Queensland. Reflex Testing for Hepatitis D Infection: A Unique Opportunity to Reduce Hepatitis D-Related Chronic Liver Disease Deaths in Australia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1