A Review of Cost-Effectiveness of Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy.

IF 3.6 4区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1097/OGX.0000000000001373
Olamide Akin-Olugbade, Tarun Jain, Allison Komorowski
{"title":"A Review of Cost-Effectiveness of Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy.","authors":"Olamide Akin-Olugbade, Tarun Jain, Allison Komorowski","doi":"10.1097/OGX.0000000000001373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) is an important focus area of reproductive medicine because of its potential to improve the odds of a live birth from in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Despite growing interest and use of this technology, there has been a limited, albeit growing, body of literature that has evaluated the cost-effectiveness of PGT-A for patients compared with IVF without PGT-A. This review aims to further explore this relationship and summarize current findings.</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>Studies were selected entering terms such as \"PGT-A,\" \"IVF,\" and \"cost-effectiveness\" in the PubMed database.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In some studies, PGT-A has been shown to be cost-effective in older patients and patients who have experienced recurrent pregnancy loss. In other studies, PGT-A use has shown comparable live birth rates to traditional IVF while carrying a more expensive price tag. In addition, PGT-A carries risk, including embryo damage and improper embryo classification, and has significant financial cost. Specifically with regards to cost-effectiveness, considerations such as age, reproductive timeline, and economic burden have been identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Ultimately, there is incomplete data addressing factors such as mosaicism, patient perspectives of the economic cost, and patient experiences surrounding PGT-A. Further studies are needed to fully evaluate PGT-A outcomes, patient experiences, and cost-effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Relevance: </strong>As utilization of assisted reproductive technology continues to increase, a careful analysis of the cost-effectiveness of additional genetic screening tests is critical to patient counseling and shared decision making.</p>","PeriodicalId":19409,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey","volume":"80 3","pages":"169-173"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/OGX.0000000000001373","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) is an important focus area of reproductive medicine because of its potential to improve the odds of a live birth from in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment.

Objectives: Despite growing interest and use of this technology, there has been a limited, albeit growing, body of literature that has evaluated the cost-effectiveness of PGT-A for patients compared with IVF without PGT-A. This review aims to further explore this relationship and summarize current findings.

Evidence acquisition: Studies were selected entering terms such as "PGT-A," "IVF," and "cost-effectiveness" in the PubMed database.

Results: In some studies, PGT-A has been shown to be cost-effective in older patients and patients who have experienced recurrent pregnancy loss. In other studies, PGT-A use has shown comparable live birth rates to traditional IVF while carrying a more expensive price tag. In addition, PGT-A carries risk, including embryo damage and improper embryo classification, and has significant financial cost. Specifically with regards to cost-effectiveness, considerations such as age, reproductive timeline, and economic burden have been identified.

Conclusions: Ultimately, there is incomplete data addressing factors such as mosaicism, patient perspectives of the economic cost, and patient experiences surrounding PGT-A. Further studies are needed to fully evaluate PGT-A outcomes, patient experiences, and cost-effectiveness.

Relevance: As utilization of assisted reproductive technology continues to increase, a careful analysis of the cost-effectiveness of additional genetic screening tests is critical to patient counseling and shared decision making.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非整倍体植入前基因检测的成本-效果综述。
重要性:非整倍体植入前基因检测(PGT-A)是生殖医学的一个重要焦点领域,因为它有可能提高体外受精(IVF)治疗中活产的几率。目的:尽管人们对这项技术的兴趣和使用越来越多,但与不使用PGT-A的体外受精相比,评估PGT-A对患者的成本效益的文献有限,尽管在不断增长。本文旨在进一步探讨这一关系并总结目前的研究结果。证据获取:研究被选择进入PubMed数据库中的术语,如“PGT-A”、“IVF”和“成本效益”。结果:在一些研究中,PGT-A已被证明对老年患者和复发性流产患者具有成本效益。在其他研究中,使用PGT-A显示出与传统试管婴儿相当的活产率,但价格更高。此外,PGT-A有风险,包括胚胎损伤和胚胎分类不当,并且有很大的经济成本。具体到成本效益方面,已经确定了年龄、生育时间和经济负担等考虑因素。结论:最终,有不完整的数据解决因素,如马赛克,患者的经济成本的观点,以及患者的经验围绕PGT-A。需要进一步的研究来充分评估PGT-A的结果、患者体验和成本效益。相关性:随着辅助生殖技术的使用不断增加,对额外基因筛查测试的成本效益进行仔细分析对于患者咨询和共同决策至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
3.20%
发文量
245
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​Each monthly issue of Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey presents summaries of the most timely and clinically relevant research being published worldwide. These concise, easy-to-read summaries provide expert insight into how to apply the latest research to patient care. The accompanying editorial commentary puts the studies into perspective and supplies authoritative guidance. The result is a valuable, time-saving resource for busy clinicians.
期刊最新文献
Adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Versus Radiotherapy Alone in Women With High-Risk Endometrial Cancer (PORTEC-3): 10-Year Clinical Outcomes and Post Hoc Analysis by Molecular Classification From a Randomized Phase 3 Trial. Active Treatment and Survival Trends for Periviable Births by Race and Ethnicity. Advancing Iron Therapy in Maternal Health: Evolving Strategies for Treating Iron Deficiency Anemia. Community-Based Mentoring to Reduce Maternal and Perinatal Mortality in Adolescent Pregnancies in Sierra Leone (2YoungLives): A Pilot Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial. Treatment of Uncomplicated Vulvovaginal Candidiasis: Topical or Oral Drugs? Single-Day or Multiple-Day Therapy? A Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1