Maximilian Hinse, Stephanie Roll, Matthias David, Jalid Sehouli, Stefan N Willich
{"title":"[Intercultural competence in healthcare - a narrative review of definitions, quality criteria and the effectiveness of training measures].","authors":"Maximilian Hinse, Stephanie Roll, Matthias David, Jalid Sehouli, Stefan N Willich","doi":"10.1055/a-2527-5573","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Around a quarter of the German population has a migrant background. There are some differences in the healthcare provided to migrants and their successor generations compared to people without a migrant background. The aim of this review was to show the different definitions of intercultural competence (ICC), the different target groups of doctors and nursing staff given ICC training courses, and the extent to which the effectiveness of these courses can be assessed with the help of existing quality criteria.Relevant publications were found by searching PUBMED, reviewing the references and literature databases of the participating authors and additionally using Google and Researchgate web searches. Both German- and English-language publications were included in the search.There are several definitions and explanations of ICC, some of which differ, but most of of them include the aspects of cultural awareness, cultural knowledge, cultural sensitivity, cultural interaction and cultural understanding. Previous studies show different target groups for ICC training and a methodologically heterogeneous assessment of the effectiveness of these measures.There is a great need for methodologically sound studies using standardised and objectifiable criteria for the evaluation of intercultural training. Further development of measures, guidelines and political framework conditions would be important for patients, professionals, organisations and associations.</p>","PeriodicalId":47653,"journal":{"name":"Gesundheitswesen","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gesundheitswesen","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2527-5573","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Around a quarter of the German population has a migrant background. There are some differences in the healthcare provided to migrants and their successor generations compared to people without a migrant background. The aim of this review was to show the different definitions of intercultural competence (ICC), the different target groups of doctors and nursing staff given ICC training courses, and the extent to which the effectiveness of these courses can be assessed with the help of existing quality criteria.Relevant publications were found by searching PUBMED, reviewing the references and literature databases of the participating authors and additionally using Google and Researchgate web searches. Both German- and English-language publications were included in the search.There are several definitions and explanations of ICC, some of which differ, but most of of them include the aspects of cultural awareness, cultural knowledge, cultural sensitivity, cultural interaction and cultural understanding. Previous studies show different target groups for ICC training and a methodologically heterogeneous assessment of the effectiveness of these measures.There is a great need for methodologically sound studies using standardised and objectifiable criteria for the evaluation of intercultural training. Further development of measures, guidelines and political framework conditions would be important for patients, professionals, organisations and associations.
期刊介绍:
The health service informs you comprehensively and up-to-date about the most important topics of the health care system. In addition to guidelines, overviews and comments, you will find current research results and contributions to CME-certified continuing education and training. The journal offers a scientific discussion forum and a platform for communications from professional societies. The content quality is ensured by a publisher body, the expert advisory board and other experts in the peer review process.