Postoperative radiotherapy improves disease-free survival of EGFR wild-type pN2 non-squamous-cell non-small-cell lung cancer (Nsq-NSCLC) patients after complete resection: a propensity score matching analysis.

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Radiation Oncology Pub Date : 2025-03-13 DOI:10.1186/s13014-025-02592-0
Yunsong Liu, Yu Men, Xu Yang, Shuang Sun, Yongxing Bao, Zeliang Ma, Yang Wang, Yirui Zhai, Jianyang Wang, Lei Deng, Wenqing Wang, Nan Bi, Luhua Wang, Zhouguang Hui
{"title":"Postoperative radiotherapy improves disease-free survival of EGFR wild-type pN2 non-squamous-cell non-small-cell lung cancer (Nsq-NSCLC) patients after complete resection: a propensity score matching analysis.","authors":"Yunsong Liu, Yu Men, Xu Yang, Shuang Sun, Yongxing Bao, Zeliang Ma, Yang Wang, Yirui Zhai, Jianyang Wang, Lei Deng, Wenqing Wang, Nan Bi, Luhua Wang, Zhouguang Hui","doi":"10.1186/s13014-025-02592-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The ADAURA study indicated that adjuvant TKI therapy improves survival in postoperative patients with EGFR-mutated (EGFRm) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), especially in stage III disease. However, the effect of PORT for stage III (N2) NSCLC with different EGFR statuses remains unclear, which we aimed to investigate in the present study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between 2006 and 2019, consecutive patients with pN2 non-squamous cell NSCLC (Nsq-NSCLC) after complete resection and adjuvant chemotherapy or EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) who had detection of EGFR status were retrospectively analyzed. PORT was administered using IMRT at 2 Gy per fraction with a total dose of 50 Gy over 5 weeks. Patients were categorized into 4 groups according to EGFR status and treatment: EGFR wild-type (EGFRwt) PORT group, EGFRwt non-PORT group, EGFRm PORT group, and EGFRm non-PORT group. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to compensate for differences in baseline characteristics. The Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used to evaluate disease-free survival (DFS), locoregional relapse-free survival (LRFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 566 patients were enrolled: 90 in the EGFRwt PORT group, 154 in the EGFRwt non-PORT group, 111 in the EGFRm PORT group, and 211 in the EGFRm non-PORT group. After PSM, the median DFS in the EGFRwt PORT group versus the EGFRwt non-PORT group were 33.9 versus 17.2 months (HR 0.62, 95%CI 0.417-0.920, P = 0.017). In EGFRwt groups, PORT also improved LRFS (HR 0.58, 95%CI 0.34-0.99, P = 0.042) and DMFS (HR 0.649, 95%CI 0.43-0.98, P = 0.038). In EGFRm groups, PORT only improved LRFS (HR 0.50, 95%CI 0.30-0.85, P = 0.009), with no significant difference in DFS or DMFS between the PORT and non-PORT groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For patients with completely resected pN2 Nsq-NSCLC receiving adjuvant chemotherapy, PORT may improve DFS in EGFRwt patients but not in EGFRm patients. Randomized clinical trials are needed for validation.</p>","PeriodicalId":49639,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Oncology","volume":"20 1","pages":"38"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11907797/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-025-02592-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The ADAURA study indicated that adjuvant TKI therapy improves survival in postoperative patients with EGFR-mutated (EGFRm) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), especially in stage III disease. However, the effect of PORT for stage III (N2) NSCLC with different EGFR statuses remains unclear, which we aimed to investigate in the present study.

Methods: Between 2006 and 2019, consecutive patients with pN2 non-squamous cell NSCLC (Nsq-NSCLC) after complete resection and adjuvant chemotherapy or EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) who had detection of EGFR status were retrospectively analyzed. PORT was administered using IMRT at 2 Gy per fraction with a total dose of 50 Gy over 5 weeks. Patients were categorized into 4 groups according to EGFR status and treatment: EGFR wild-type (EGFRwt) PORT group, EGFRwt non-PORT group, EGFRm PORT group, and EGFRm non-PORT group. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to compensate for differences in baseline characteristics. The Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used to evaluate disease-free survival (DFS), locoregional relapse-free survival (LRFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS).

Results: A total of 566 patients were enrolled: 90 in the EGFRwt PORT group, 154 in the EGFRwt non-PORT group, 111 in the EGFRm PORT group, and 211 in the EGFRm non-PORT group. After PSM, the median DFS in the EGFRwt PORT group versus the EGFRwt non-PORT group were 33.9 versus 17.2 months (HR 0.62, 95%CI 0.417-0.920, P = 0.017). In EGFRwt groups, PORT also improved LRFS (HR 0.58, 95%CI 0.34-0.99, P = 0.042) and DMFS (HR 0.649, 95%CI 0.43-0.98, P = 0.038). In EGFRm groups, PORT only improved LRFS (HR 0.50, 95%CI 0.30-0.85, P = 0.009), with no significant difference in DFS or DMFS between the PORT and non-PORT groups.

Conclusion: For patients with completely resected pN2 Nsq-NSCLC receiving adjuvant chemotherapy, PORT may improve DFS in EGFRwt patients but not in EGFRm patients. Randomized clinical trials are needed for validation.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
术后放疗提高EGFR野生型pN2非鳞状细胞非小细胞肺癌(Nsq-NSCLC)患者完全切除后的无病生存:倾向评分匹配分析
背景:ADAURA研究表明,辅助TKI治疗可提高egfr突变(EGFRm)非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)术后患者的生存率,尤其是III期患者。然而,PORT对不同EGFR状态的III期(N2) NSCLC的影响尚不清楚,我们在本研究中旨在探讨这一点。方法:回顾性分析2006年至2019年期间,经完全切除并辅助化疗或EGFR酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)检测的连续pN2非鳞状细胞NSCLC (Nsq-NSCLC)患者的EGFR状态。PORT使用IMRT给药,每次剂量为2gy,总剂量为50gy,持续5周。根据EGFR状态和治疗方法将患者分为EGFR野生型(EGFRwt) PORT组、EGFRwt非PORT组、EGFRm PORT组和EGFRm非PORT组。倾向评分匹配(PSM)用于补偿基线特征的差异。Kaplan-Meier法和log-rank检验用于评估无病生存期(DFS)、局部无复发生存期(LRFS)和远端无转移生存期(DMFS)。结果:共纳入566例患者:EGFRwt PORT组90例,EGFRwt非PORT组154例,EGFRm PORT组111例,EGFRm非PORT组211例。PSM后,EGFRwt PORT组和EGFRwt非PORT组的中位DFS分别为33.9个月和17.2个月(HR 0.62, 95%CI 0.417-0.920, P = 0.017)。在EGFRwt组中,PORT也改善了LRFS (HR 0.58, 95%CI 0.34-0.99, P = 0.042)和DMFS (HR 0.649, 95%CI 0.43-0.98, P = 0.038)。在EGFRm组中,PORT仅改善LRFS (HR 0.50, 95%CI 0.30-0.85, P = 0.009), PORT组和非PORT组的DFS或DMFS无显著差异。结论:对于接受辅助化疗的完全切除的pN2 Nsq-NSCLC患者,PORT可改善EGFRwt患者的DFS,但对EGFRm患者无改善作用。需要随机临床试验来验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Radiation Oncology
Radiation Oncology ONCOLOGY-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.80%
发文量
181
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Radiation Oncology encompasses all aspects of research that impacts on the treatment of cancer using radiation. It publishes findings in molecular and cellular radiation biology, radiation physics, radiation technology, and clinical oncology.
期刊最新文献
Correction: Re-irradiation in oligorecurrence and oligometastatic cervical cancer in modern radiotherapy era. The effect of quantitative goal exercise combined with whole process refined nutrition management on the nutritional status and quality of life of head and neck cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy: an open-label, randomized, controlled trial. A time-adapted risk stratification framework guided by longitudinal post-radiotherapy EBV DNA clearance for high-risk nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients. Multicenter peritumoral radiomics in oncology: advances, challenges, and future directions. Prediction of local failure after stereotactic radiotherapy in melanoma brain metastases using ensemble learning on clinical, dosimetric, and radiomic data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1