Clinical results of combined aortic valve-sparing root replacement and mitral valve repair.

0 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery Pub Date : 2025-03-29 DOI:10.1093/icvts/ivaf067
Veronica Lorenz, Jama Jahanyar, Stefano Mastrobuoni, Antonio Segreto, Luca Zanella, Gaby Aphram, Matteo Pettinari, Gebrine El Khoury, Laurent De Kerchove
{"title":"Clinical results of combined aortic valve-sparing root replacement and mitral valve repair.","authors":"Veronica Lorenz, Jama Jahanyar, Stefano Mastrobuoni, Antonio Segreto, Luca Zanella, Gaby Aphram, Matteo Pettinari, Gebrine El Khoury, Laurent De Kerchove","doi":"10.1093/icvts/ivaf067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Aortic valve-sparing root replacement using the reimplantation technique and mitral valve (MV) repair are well-established surgical approaches for the treatment of aortic root pathologies and mitral valve insufficiency. However, the management of concomitant diseases with a dual valve-preserving strategy remains poorly described. Therefore, the aim of this study is to evaluate the long-term outcomes of concomitant valve-sparing surgery and MV repair.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This case series includes all the patients who underwent combined valve-sparing root replacement and MV repair at Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc (Brussels, Belgium) between January 2000 and June 2022. Actual survival rate and freedom from reoperation were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and the log rank test was used for statistical evaluation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-five patients were included in the study; they were divided into two groups (13 patients with and 32 patients without connective tissue disorders). There was no hospital mortality. Three patients (7%) required pacemaker implantation. Overall survival at 10 years was 90% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 64-97%). Furthermore, freedom from all reoperations at 10 years was 84% (95% CI: 64-93%). Analysing the two subgroups, we found no statistically significant difference in terms of 10-year survival (log rank P = 0.146). However, freedom from reoperation at 10 years was significantly lower in the connective tissue disorder group (63% vs 91%, log rank P = 0.031). Most patients treated with transaortic edge-to-edge repair required MV reoperation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Combined valve-sparing root replacement with the reimplantation technique and MV operations are complex surgeries. However, they can be performed safely, with excellent long-term survival and repair durability. Applying standard Carpentier techniques for MV repair is crucial, especially in patients with connective tissue disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":73406,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11955238/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivaf067","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Aortic valve-sparing root replacement using the reimplantation technique and mitral valve (MV) repair are well-established surgical approaches for the treatment of aortic root pathologies and mitral valve insufficiency. However, the management of concomitant diseases with a dual valve-preserving strategy remains poorly described. Therefore, the aim of this study is to evaluate the long-term outcomes of concomitant valve-sparing surgery and MV repair.

Methods: This case series includes all the patients who underwent combined valve-sparing root replacement and MV repair at Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc (Brussels, Belgium) between January 2000 and June 2022. Actual survival rate and freedom from reoperation were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and the log rank test was used for statistical evaluation.

Results: Forty-five patients were included in the study; they were divided into two groups (13 patients with and 32 patients without connective tissue disorders). There was no hospital mortality. Three patients (7%) required pacemaker implantation. Overall survival at 10 years was 90% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 64-97%). Furthermore, freedom from all reoperations at 10 years was 84% (95% CI: 64-93%). Analysing the two subgroups, we found no statistically significant difference in terms of 10-year survival (log rank P = 0.146). However, freedom from reoperation at 10 years was significantly lower in the connective tissue disorder group (63% vs 91%, log rank P = 0.031). Most patients treated with transaortic edge-to-edge repair required MV reoperation.

Conclusions: Combined valve-sparing root replacement with the reimplantation technique and MV operations are complex surgeries. However, they can be performed safely, with excellent long-term survival and repair durability. Applying standard Carpentier techniques for MV repair is crucial, especially in patients with connective tissue disorders.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
主动脉瓣保留根部置换术和二尖瓣修复术联合应用的临床效果。
目的:主动脉瓣置换术和二尖瓣修复术是治疗主动脉根部病变和二尖瓣功能不全的有效手术方法。然而,双瓣膜保留策略对伴随疾病的管理仍然缺乏描述。因此,本研究的目的是评估合并保留二尖瓣手术和二尖瓣修复的长期结果。方法:这种情况下系列包括所有患者接受联合阀抽出根替代和二尖瓣修复在倩碧大学医疗Saint-Luc(布鲁塞尔,比利时)2000年1月至2022年6月。采用Kaplan-Meier法计算实际生存率和不再手术次数,采用对数秩检验进行统计评价。结果:45例患者纳入研究,分为2组(有结缔组织病患者13例,无结缔组织病患者32例)。没有医院死亡率。3例(7%)患者需要植入起搏器。10年总生存率为90% (95% CI: 64-97%)。此外,10年内所有再手术的发生率为84% (95% CI: 64%-93%)。分析两个亚组,我们发现10年生存率无统计学差异(log rank p = 0.146)。然而,结缔组织疾病组10年的再手术自由度明显较低(63% vs 91%, log rank p = 0.031)。大多数经主动脉边缘到边缘修复的患者需要二尖瓣再手术。结论:保留瓣根置换术联合二尖瓣再植术是一种复杂的手术。然而,它们可以安全地进行,具有良好的长期生存和修复耐久性。应用标准卡彭迪埃技术进行二尖瓣修复是至关重要的,特别是结缔组织疾病患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pitfall of wide wedge resection: risk of overlooking surgical margin shortage. The GERAADA risk score for early mortality after surgery for acute type A aortic dissection: an external validation in the Dutch setting. Alternative Base Solutions for Del Nido Cardioplegia: composition, Rationale, and Clinical Evidence. A TEM-based propensity score matched analysis depending on surgical expertise in patients without malperfusion undergoing surgery for acute type A aortic dissection. Comparison of extended arch vs hemiarch replacement in elderly patients with type A aortic dissection: the Shizuoka Kokuho Database.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1