Risk of epilepsy in neonates with seizures

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology Pub Date : 2025-03-14 DOI:10.1111/dmcn.16305
Lakshmi Nagarajan
{"title":"Risk of epilepsy in neonates with seizures","authors":"Lakshmi Nagarajan","doi":"10.1111/dmcn.16305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Seizures occur more frequently during the neonatal period than in any other time of life. Neonates with seizures have an increased risk of mortality and neurodevelopmental sequalae such as epilepsy, cognitive and motor disability, sleep, and behavioural dysfunction. The clinical conundrum of accurate diagnosis of neonatal seizures and optimal interventional packages persists.<span><sup>1</sup></span></p><p>There are wide variations (6%–56%) in estimates of neurodevelopmental sequelae in survivors of neonatal seizures due to varying methods of identification of seizures, size of population, case series versus population-based studies, socioeconomic status, geographical location, duration of follow-up, and type of assessments undertaken. Accurate diagnosis of seizures in the neonate is the first essential step to assess efficacy of therapies and to prognosticate with confidence.</p><p>In this useful, large, well conducted register-based cohort study of all children born in Denmark between 1997 and 2018,<span><sup>2</sup></span> Tinggaard et al. confirm the increased risk of epilepsy among survivors of neonatal seizures, with a cumulative risk of about 20%. The majority of those who had postneonatal epilepsy had onset in the first year of life, and those with structural abnormalities in the brain had a higher risk, confirming previous reports. The reported persistence of the increased risk of epilepsy into adolescence and young adulthood, will be useful for counselling. An interesting and surprising finding from the study is the increased risk of febrile seizures in survivors of neonatal seizures who did not have postneonatal epilepsy.</p><p>Neonates with seizures may have electrographic-only seizures, electroclinical-only seizures, or both.<span><sup>3</sup></span> It is well known that underestimation and overdiagnosis of seizures may occur in neonates.<span><sup>4</sup></span> Correct identification of neonates with seizures and estimation of seizure burden is an essential first step for meaningful interventional and follow-up studies. The modification for neonates of the International League Against Epilepsy classification of seizures and the epilepsies<span><sup>5</sup></span> clearly recognize conventional video electroencephalogram (EEG) as the criterion standard for diagnosis and monitoring of seizures in the neonate. However, conventional EEG monitoring is not available in most parts of the world. The authors acknowledge that the identification of many neonates with seizures in their cohort may have been based on clinical features (most probably had amplitude-integrated EEG or conventional EEG confirmation), and thus a limitation of the study.<span><sup>2</sup></span></p><p>Most neonatal seizures are provoked or symptomatic in nature. However, a small number are of genetic origin and an early aetiological diagnosis may guide personalized therapy and influence aetiological classifications and outcomes.<span><sup>1</sup></span></p><p>It is important for the global health community to harness resources to facilitate good clinical care with early accurate diagnosis of seizures in the neonate, identification of aetiology, development of tailored treatment packages, evaluation of therapies, assessment of epilepsy, and other neurodevelopmental and health outcomes over an extended period of follow-up, as well as precise prognostication. This study by Tinggaard et al. is a good addition to the literature in this area.</p>","PeriodicalId":50587,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology","volume":"67 9","pages":"1112-1113"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/dmcn.16305","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dmcn.16305","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Seizures occur more frequently during the neonatal period than in any other time of life. Neonates with seizures have an increased risk of mortality and neurodevelopmental sequalae such as epilepsy, cognitive and motor disability, sleep, and behavioural dysfunction. The clinical conundrum of accurate diagnosis of neonatal seizures and optimal interventional packages persists.1

There are wide variations (6%–56%) in estimates of neurodevelopmental sequelae in survivors of neonatal seizures due to varying methods of identification of seizures, size of population, case series versus population-based studies, socioeconomic status, geographical location, duration of follow-up, and type of assessments undertaken. Accurate diagnosis of seizures in the neonate is the first essential step to assess efficacy of therapies and to prognosticate with confidence.

In this useful, large, well conducted register-based cohort study of all children born in Denmark between 1997 and 2018,2 Tinggaard et al. confirm the increased risk of epilepsy among survivors of neonatal seizures, with a cumulative risk of about 20%. The majority of those who had postneonatal epilepsy had onset in the first year of life, and those with structural abnormalities in the brain had a higher risk, confirming previous reports. The reported persistence of the increased risk of epilepsy into adolescence and young adulthood, will be useful for counselling. An interesting and surprising finding from the study is the increased risk of febrile seizures in survivors of neonatal seizures who did not have postneonatal epilepsy.

Neonates with seizures may have electrographic-only seizures, electroclinical-only seizures, or both.3 It is well known that underestimation and overdiagnosis of seizures may occur in neonates.4 Correct identification of neonates with seizures and estimation of seizure burden is an essential first step for meaningful interventional and follow-up studies. The modification for neonates of the International League Against Epilepsy classification of seizures and the epilepsies5 clearly recognize conventional video electroencephalogram (EEG) as the criterion standard for diagnosis and monitoring of seizures in the neonate. However, conventional EEG monitoring is not available in most parts of the world. The authors acknowledge that the identification of many neonates with seizures in their cohort may have been based on clinical features (most probably had amplitude-integrated EEG or conventional EEG confirmation), and thus a limitation of the study.2

Most neonatal seizures are provoked or symptomatic in nature. However, a small number are of genetic origin and an early aetiological diagnosis may guide personalized therapy and influence aetiological classifications and outcomes.1

It is important for the global health community to harness resources to facilitate good clinical care with early accurate diagnosis of seizures in the neonate, identification of aetiology, development of tailored treatment packages, evaluation of therapies, assessment of epilepsy, and other neurodevelopmental and health outcomes over an extended period of follow-up, as well as precise prognostication. This study by Tinggaard et al. is a good addition to the literature in this area.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
癫痫发作的新生儿癫痫风险。
癫痫发作发生在新生儿期比在生命的任何其他时间更频繁。癫痫发作的新生儿死亡率和神经发育后遗症(如癫痫、认知和运动障碍、睡眠和行为障碍)的风险增加。准确诊断新生儿癫痫发作和最佳干预方案的临床难题仍然存在。1新生儿癫痫发作幸存者的神经发育后遗症估计存在很大差异(6%-56%),这是由于癫痫发作的识别方法、人群规模、病例系列与基于人群的研究、社会经济地位、地理位置、随访时间和评估类型的不同。准确诊断癫痫发作的新生儿是第一个必不可少的步骤,以评估疗效的治疗和预后的信心。Tinggaard等人对1997年至2018年间在丹麦出生的所有儿童进行了一项有用的、大型的、进行良好的基于登记的队列研究,证实新生儿癫痫发作幸存者的癫痫风险增加,累积风险约为20%。大多数新生儿癫痫发作在出生后的第一年,而那些大脑结构异常的人有更高的风险,证实了以前的报道。据报道,进入青春期和青年期癫痫风险持续增加,这将有助于提供咨询。这项研究的一个有趣和令人惊讶的发现是,没有新生儿癫痫的新生儿癫痫幸存者发生热性癫痫发作的风险增加。有癫痫发作的新生儿可能有纯电性癫痫发作,纯电性癫痫发作,或两者兼而有之众所周知,在新生儿中可能会出现癫痫发作的低估和过度诊断正确识别新生儿癫痫发作和估计癫痫发作负担是有意义的介入和随访研究必不可少的第一步。国际抗癫痫联盟对新生儿癫痫发作和癫痫分类的修改5明确将常规视频脑电图(EEG)作为诊断和监测新生儿癫痫发作的标准。然而,传统的脑电图监测在世界上大多数地区是不可用的。作者承认,在他们的队列中,许多癫痫发作的新生儿的识别可能是基于临床特征(最有可能是波幅集成脑电图或常规脑电图确认),因此是研究的局限性。大多数新生儿癫痫发作是诱发性或症状性的。然而,少数是遗传原因,早期的病因诊断可以指导个性化治疗,并影响病因分类和结果。1对于全球卫生界来说,重要的是利用资源促进良好的临床护理,早期准确诊断新生儿癫痫发作,确定病因,制定量身定制的治疗方案,评估治疗方法,评估癫痫,以及在较长随访期间的其他神经发育和健康结果,以及精确预测。Tinggaard等人的这项研究是对该领域文献的一个很好的补充。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
13.20%
发文量
338
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Wiley-Blackwell is pleased to publish Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology (DMCN), a Mac Keith Press publication and official journal of the American Academy for Cerebral Palsy and Developmental Medicine (AACPDM) and the British Paediatric Neurology Association (BPNA). For over 50 years, DMCN has defined the field of paediatric neurology and neurodisability and is one of the world’s leading journals in the whole field of paediatrics. DMCN disseminates a range of information worldwide to improve the lives of disabled children and their families. The high quality of published articles is maintained by expert review, including independent statistical assessment, before acceptance.
期刊最新文献
Instrumentos que avaliam a mobilidade de crianças e adolescentes com transtorno do espectro autista: Uma revisão sistemática e mapa de decisão. Eye patches and seizure frequency in young people with Sunflower syndrome. Augmented reality and pain during botulinum neurotoxin A injections in children with cerebral palsy: A randomized controlled trial. E-words are essential to elicit early development, but words are not enough. Assessment of trunk movement and posture in spastic and dyskinetic cerebral palsy: A scoping review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1