What Are Mechanisms? Ways of Conceptualizing and Studying Causal Mechanisms

IF 7.6 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT Organizational Research Methods Pub Date : 2025-03-14 DOI:10.1177/10944281251318727
Joep P. Cornelissen, Mirjam Werner
{"title":"What Are Mechanisms? Ways of Conceptualizing and Studying Causal Mechanisms","authors":"Joep P. Cornelissen, Mirjam Werner","doi":"10.1177/10944281251318727","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the last two decades, much of management research has converged on the belief that one of its major aims is to identify the causal mechanisms that produce the phenomena that researchers seek to explain. In this paper, we review and synthesize the literature that has amassed around causal mechanisms. We do so by detailing the different methodological perspectives that are featured in management research, which we label as the contextual, constitutive, and interventionist perspectives. For each of these perspectives, we examine what it theoretically presupposes a mechanism to be, how this connects to methodological choices, and how this shapes the kind of mechanism-based explanations that each perspective offers. We also explore the main inferential challenges for each of these perspectives and offer specific methodological guidance in response. In this way, we aim to offer a common plank for theorizing and research on causal mechanisms in ways that recognize and harness the productive differences across different epistemologies and methodological traditions.","PeriodicalId":19689,"journal":{"name":"Organizational Research Methods","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Organizational Research Methods","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10944281251318727","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Over the last two decades, much of management research has converged on the belief that one of its major aims is to identify the causal mechanisms that produce the phenomena that researchers seek to explain. In this paper, we review and synthesize the literature that has amassed around causal mechanisms. We do so by detailing the different methodological perspectives that are featured in management research, which we label as the contextual, constitutive, and interventionist perspectives. For each of these perspectives, we examine what it theoretically presupposes a mechanism to be, how this connects to methodological choices, and how this shapes the kind of mechanism-based explanations that each perspective offers. We also explore the main inferential challenges for each of these perspectives and offer specific methodological guidance in response. In this way, we aim to offer a common plank for theorizing and research on causal mechanisms in ways that recognize and harness the productive differences across different epistemologies and methodological traditions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
什么是机制?因果机制的概念化与研究方法
在过去的二十年里,许多管理研究都集中在这样一个信念上,即管理学的主要目标之一是确定产生研究人员试图解释的现象的因果机制。在本文中,我们回顾和综合了有关因果机制的文献。我们通过详细描述管理研究中不同的方法论视角来做到这一点,我们将其称为情境视角、构成视角和干预视角。对于每一种观点,我们都研究了它在理论上预设的机制是什么,它是如何与方法论选择联系在一起的,以及这是如何形成每种观点所提供的基于机制的解释的。我们还探讨了这些观点的主要推理挑战,并提供了具体的方法指导。通过这种方式,我们旨在通过认识和利用不同认识论和方法传统之间的生产差异的方式,为因果机制的理论化和研究提供一个共同的平台。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
23.20
自引率
3.20%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: Organizational Research Methods (ORM) was founded with the aim of introducing pertinent methodological advancements to researchers in organizational sciences. The objective of ORM is to promote the application of current and emerging methodologies to advance both theory and research practices. Articles are expected to be comprehensible to readers with a background consistent with the methodological and statistical training provided in contemporary organizational sciences doctoral programs. The text should be presented in a manner that facilitates accessibility. For instance, highly technical content should be placed in appendices, and authors are encouraged to include example data and computer code when relevant. Additionally, authors should explicitly outline how their contribution has the potential to advance organizational theory and research practice.
期刊最新文献
Applying Machine Learning and Natural Language Processing Methods to Support Taxonomy Development and Maintenance Unpacking the Validity of Open-Ended Personality Assessments Using Fine-Tuned Large Language Models I Gotta Feeling: Advancing Sentiment Analysis in Organizational Science Application of Prototype Analysis to Organizational Research: A Critical Methodological Review Understanding Relative Differences with Magnitude-Based Hypotheses: A Methodological Conceptualization and Data Illustration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1