Getting Everyone on Board to Break the Cycle of Bacterial Vaginosis (BV) Recurrence: A Qualitative Study of Partner Treatment for BV.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Patient-Patient Centered Outcomes Research Pub Date : 2025-03-14 DOI:10.1007/s40271-025-00731-z
Alicia J King, Tiffany R Phillips, Erica L Plummer, Natasha Wild, Christopher K Fairley, Eric P F Chow, Lenka A Vodstrcil, Catriona S Bradshaw
{"title":"Getting Everyone on Board to Break the Cycle of Bacterial Vaginosis (BV) Recurrence: A Qualitative Study of Partner Treatment for BV.","authors":"Alicia J King, Tiffany R Phillips, Erica L Plummer, Natasha Wild, Christopher K Fairley, Eric P F Chow, Lenka A Vodstrcil, Catriona S Bradshaw","doi":"10.1007/s40271-025-00731-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is a common condition that affects the sexual wellbeing of women and other people with a vagina. Recurrence following individual treatment is frequent and exerts a cumulative burden over time. Researchers at the Melbourne Sexual Health Center have recently completed the first successful trial of male partner treatment (MPT) for BV, demonstrating the superior effectiveness of concurrent MPT in reducing recurrence.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Using a case study design, semi-structured interviews with trial participants explored the views and experiences of nine men who had received MPT and nine women whose partners had received MPT. Action and emotion coding were employed to create an explanatory model of experiences of BV recurrence and MPT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three key themes within this model related to the cycle of recurrent BV: the physical, psychological, and relationship impacts of BV (\"experiencing BV\"); the importance of healthcare providers exploring different options and understanding individual context (\"seeking care\"); and the frustration, cost, and inconvenience of individual treatment (\"dealing with it alone\"). This cycle was broken by \"Getting everyone on board\" with MPT. This involved women, men, and healthcare professionals understanding BV and MPT, overcoming barriers to access, and open communication between partners. These factors, in combination, resulted in couples \"dealing with BV together\", undertaking a week of inconvenience to share the responsibility of preventing recurrence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings suggest that the widescale adoption of MPT for BV will require multilevel approaches to address gaps in the awareness of BV with sensitivity to the relational, social, and structural context of delivering care.</p>","PeriodicalId":51271,"journal":{"name":"Patient-Patient Centered Outcomes Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patient-Patient Centered Outcomes Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40271-025-00731-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is a common condition that affects the sexual wellbeing of women and other people with a vagina. Recurrence following individual treatment is frequent and exerts a cumulative burden over time. Researchers at the Melbourne Sexual Health Center have recently completed the first successful trial of male partner treatment (MPT) for BV, demonstrating the superior effectiveness of concurrent MPT in reducing recurrence.

Method: Using a case study design, semi-structured interviews with trial participants explored the views and experiences of nine men who had received MPT and nine women whose partners had received MPT. Action and emotion coding were employed to create an explanatory model of experiences of BV recurrence and MPT.

Results: Three key themes within this model related to the cycle of recurrent BV: the physical, psychological, and relationship impacts of BV ("experiencing BV"); the importance of healthcare providers exploring different options and understanding individual context ("seeking care"); and the frustration, cost, and inconvenience of individual treatment ("dealing with it alone"). This cycle was broken by "Getting everyone on board" with MPT. This involved women, men, and healthcare professionals understanding BV and MPT, overcoming barriers to access, and open communication between partners. These factors, in combination, resulted in couples "dealing with BV together", undertaking a week of inconvenience to share the responsibility of preventing recurrence.

Conclusion: These findings suggest that the widescale adoption of MPT for BV will require multilevel approaches to address gaps in the awareness of BV with sensitivity to the relational, social, and structural context of delivering care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
让每个人都参与进来,打破细菌性阴道病(BV)复发的恶性循环:BV 伴侣治疗定性研究》。
简介细菌性阴道病(BV)是一种影响妇女和其他有阴道者性健康的常见病。个别治疗后经常复发,并随着时间的推移造成累积负担。墨尔本性健康中心(Melbourne Sexual Health Center)的研究人员最近首次成功完成了男性伴侣治疗(MPT)治疗 BV 的试验,证明了同时进行 MPT 在减少复发方面的卓越效果:方法:采用案例研究设计,对试验参与者进行半结构化访谈,探讨九名接受过 MPT 治疗的男性和九名其伴侣接受过 MPT 治疗的女性的观点和经历。结果:该模型中的三个关键主题与 BV 复发和 MPT 有关:该模型中的三个关键主题与 BV 复发的循环有关:BV 对生理、心理和人际关系的影响("经历 BV");医疗服务提供者探索不同选择和了解个人情况的重要性("寻求护理");以及个人治疗的挫败感、成本和不便("独自应对")。打破这一循环的方法是 "让所有人都参与进来"。这涉及到女性、男性和医疗专业人员对 BV 和 MPT 的理解,克服获得治疗的障碍,以及合作伙伴之间的坦诚沟通。这些因素结合在一起,使夫妻 "共同应对 BV",承担一周的不便,分担预防复发的责任:这些研究结果表明,要广泛采用 MPT 治疗 BV,就需要采取多层次的方法,以解决人们对 BV 认识上的差距,并对提供护理的关系、社会和结构背景保持敏感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Patient-Patient Centered Outcomes Research
Patient-Patient Centered Outcomes Research HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
8.30%
发文量
44
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Patient provides a venue for scientifically rigorous, timely, and relevant research to promote the development, evaluation and implementation of therapies, technologies, and innovations that will enhance the patient experience. It is an international forum for research that advances and/or applies qualitative or quantitative methods to promote the generation, synthesis, or interpretation of evidence. The journal has specific interest in receiving original research, reviews and commentaries related to qualitative and mixed methods research, stated-preference methods, patient reported outcomes, and shared decision making. Advances in regulatory science, patient-focused drug development, patient-centered benefit-risk and health technology assessment will also be considered. Additional digital features (including animated abstracts, video abstracts, slide decks, audio slides, instructional videos, infographics, podcasts and animations) can be published with articles; these are designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. In addition, articles published in The Patient may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist readers who have some knowledge of, but not in-depth expertise in, the area to understand important medical advances. All manuscripts are subject to peer review by international experts.
期刊最新文献
How do Design Characteristics Affect Respondent Engagement? Assessing Attribute Non-attendance in Discrete Choice Experiments Valuing the EQ-5D-5L. Incorporating Best-Worst Scaling (BWS) Questions into Focus Groups to Improve Understanding of Patient Preferences and Refine BWS Attributes. Getting Everyone on Board to Break the Cycle of Bacterial Vaginosis (BV) Recurrence: A Qualitative Study of Partner Treatment for BV. Unveiling Preferences in Closed Communities: Development of a Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE) Questionnaire to Elicit Ultra-Orthodox Women Preferences for Video Consultations in Primary Care. Preferences of Cancer Survivors for Follow-Up Care: A Systematic Review of Discrete Choice Experiments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1