Daphne Lew, Laura R Baratta, Linlin Xia, Elise Eiden, Christine A Sinsky, Thomas Kannampallil, Sunny S Lou
{"title":"Association of EHR-Integrated Secure Messaging Use with Clinician Workload and Attention Switching.","authors":"Daphne Lew, Laura R Baratta, Linlin Xia, Elise Eiden, Christine A Sinsky, Thomas Kannampallil, Sunny S Lou","doi":"10.1007/s11606-025-09466-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Secure messaging use for clinician-to-clinician communication has grown rapidly in recent years.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the association between secure messaging use, electronic health record (EHR) time, and frequency of attention switching among clinicians primarily working in an inpatient setting.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Attending physicians, trainee physicians, and advanced practice providers who worked in an inpatient setting during a 3-month period (February-April, 2023) from 14 hospitals within a large midwestern health system.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>Secure messaging use (i.e., Epic Secure Chat) was measured as the total number of messages sent or received between clinicians, aggregated at the clinician-day level. The primary outcomes were EHR time (a measure for workload) and the frequency of patient switching (a measure for cognitive burden) within the EHR. Linear mixed-effect models were used to examine the association between daily secure messaging volume and the primary outcomes, adjusting for age, gender, patient load, and correlations within clinicians and clinical service assignments.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>A total of 3996 clinicians (2174 [54%] female, median age 38 years [IQR 33, 48]) with 103,285 clinical work days, > 145 million audit log actions, and ~ 4.5 million secure messages were included. Median secure messaging volume was 9 (IQR 0, 51) messages per day, median EHR time was 250.5 min (IQR 140.3, 377.4) per day, and median number of patient switches was 79 (IQR 35, 147) per day. An increase in secure messaging volume from the 25th to 75th percentile was associated with a 25.5 min (95% CI 24.8, 26.2, p < 0.001) increase in EHR time and 18.1 (95% CI 17.6,18.6, p < 0.001) additional patient switches.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Secure messaging use was associated with increased EHR time and frequency of attention switching. The results suggest that secure messaging use is associated with clinician work behaviors, potentially contributing to increased workload and cognitive burden.</p>","PeriodicalId":15860,"journal":{"name":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"2240-2247"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12343377/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-025-09466-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Secure messaging use for clinician-to-clinician communication has grown rapidly in recent years.
Objective: To examine the association between secure messaging use, electronic health record (EHR) time, and frequency of attention switching among clinicians primarily working in an inpatient setting.
Design: Retrospective cohort study.
Participants: Attending physicians, trainee physicians, and advanced practice providers who worked in an inpatient setting during a 3-month period (February-April, 2023) from 14 hospitals within a large midwestern health system.
Main measures: Secure messaging use (i.e., Epic Secure Chat) was measured as the total number of messages sent or received between clinicians, aggregated at the clinician-day level. The primary outcomes were EHR time (a measure for workload) and the frequency of patient switching (a measure for cognitive burden) within the EHR. Linear mixed-effect models were used to examine the association between daily secure messaging volume and the primary outcomes, adjusting for age, gender, patient load, and correlations within clinicians and clinical service assignments.
Key results: A total of 3996 clinicians (2174 [54%] female, median age 38 years [IQR 33, 48]) with 103,285 clinical work days, > 145 million audit log actions, and ~ 4.5 million secure messages were included. Median secure messaging volume was 9 (IQR 0, 51) messages per day, median EHR time was 250.5 min (IQR 140.3, 377.4) per day, and median number of patient switches was 79 (IQR 35, 147) per day. An increase in secure messaging volume from the 25th to 75th percentile was associated with a 25.5 min (95% CI 24.8, 26.2, p < 0.001) increase in EHR time and 18.1 (95% CI 17.6,18.6, p < 0.001) additional patient switches.
Conclusions: Secure messaging use was associated with increased EHR time and frequency of attention switching. The results suggest that secure messaging use is associated with clinician work behaviors, potentially contributing to increased workload and cognitive burden.
背景:近年来,用于临床医生之间通信的安全消息传递发展迅速。目的:研究主要在住院环境中工作的临床医生使用安全信息、电子健康记录(EHR)时间和注意力转换频率之间的关系。设计:回顾性队列研究。参与者:在3个月期间(2023年2月至4月)在住院环境中工作的来自中西部大型卫生系统内14家医院的主治医生、实习医生和高级执业提供者。主要衡量标准:安全消息使用(即Epic安全聊天)被衡量为临床医生之间发送或接收的消息总数,以临床医生日级别汇总。主要结果是电子病历时间(工作量衡量指标)和患者转换频率(认知负担衡量指标)。使用线性混合效应模型来检查每日安全信息量与主要结果之间的关系,调整年龄、性别、患者负荷以及临床医生和临床服务分配之间的相关性。主要结果:共有3996名临床医生(2174名[54%]女性,中位年龄38岁[IQR 33,48]),临床工作天数103,285天,审计日志操作bb1.45亿次,安全信息约450万条。安全消息传递量中位数为9 (IQR为0,51)条/天,电子病历时间中位数为250.5 min (IQR为140.3,377.4)/天,患者切换次数中位数为79 (IQR为35,147)/天。从第25个百分位数到第75个百分位数的安全消息量的增加与25.5分钟相关(95% CI 24.8, 26.2, p)。结论:安全消息的使用与电子病历时间和注意力转换频率的增加有关。结果表明,安全信息的使用与临床医生的工作行为有关,可能会增加工作量和认知负担。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of General Internal Medicine is the official journal of the Society of General Internal Medicine. It promotes improved patient care, research, and education in primary care, general internal medicine, and hospital medicine. Its articles focus on topics such as clinical medicine, epidemiology, prevention, health care delivery, curriculum development, and numerous other non-traditional themes, in addition to classic clinical research on problems in internal medicine.