Robotic surgery for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a concise systematic review.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-14 DOI:10.1007/s00464-025-11650-3
Yutaro Aoyagi, Federico Gaudenzi, Taiga Wakabayashi, Yu Teshigahara, Yusuke Nie, Go Wakabayashi
{"title":"Robotic surgery for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a concise systematic review.","authors":"Yutaro Aoyagi, Federico Gaudenzi, Taiga Wakabayashi, Yu Teshigahara, Yusuke Nie, Go Wakabayashi","doi":"10.1007/s00464-025-11650-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC) is a challenging malignancy with a poor prognosis, and the role of robotic surgery in its management remains debated. This systematic review aims to assess the feasibility of robotic surgery for PHC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature search was conducted following PRISMA guidelines in Medline, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science for English-language studies on robotic surgery for PHC between 2000 and 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the initial 405 manuscripts identified, five studies comprising 110 patients met the inclusion criteria. Pooled analysis showed that operative time ranged from 276 (170-500) to 840 (770-890) minutes, with intraoperative blood loss between 125 (50-425) and 700 (600-800) ml. The rates of overall and major morbidity were 50.0% and 13.6%, respectively. The 30-day and 90-day postoperative mortality rates were 1.8% and 1.9%, respectively. R0 resections were achieved in 78.2% of patients, with a median lymph node retrieval of 7 (8 ± 6.6) to 11 (6-31). Follow-up duration ranged from 7.5 (8.3 ± 2.3) to 15 (19 ± 16) months, recurrence was observed in 14.3% (6/42) of patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Robotic surgery for PHC demonstrates promising perioperative outcomes; however, further studies are needed to assess its long-term oncological efficacy compared with traditional approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":22174,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","volume":" ","pages":"2701-2710"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-025-11650-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC) is a challenging malignancy with a poor prognosis, and the role of robotic surgery in its management remains debated. This systematic review aims to assess the feasibility of robotic surgery for PHC.

Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted following PRISMA guidelines in Medline, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science for English-language studies on robotic surgery for PHC between 2000 and 2024.

Results: Of the initial 405 manuscripts identified, five studies comprising 110 patients met the inclusion criteria. Pooled analysis showed that operative time ranged from 276 (170-500) to 840 (770-890) minutes, with intraoperative blood loss between 125 (50-425) and 700 (600-800) ml. The rates of overall and major morbidity were 50.0% and 13.6%, respectively. The 30-day and 90-day postoperative mortality rates were 1.8% and 1.9%, respectively. R0 resections were achieved in 78.2% of patients, with a median lymph node retrieval of 7 (8 ± 6.6) to 11 (6-31). Follow-up duration ranged from 7.5 (8.3 ± 2.3) to 15 (19 ± 16) months, recurrence was observed in 14.3% (6/42) of patients.

Conclusions: Robotic surgery for PHC demonstrates promising perioperative outcomes; however, further studies are needed to assess its long-term oncological efficacy compared with traditional approaches.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
机器人手术治疗肝门周围胆管癌:一个简明的系统综述。
背景:肝门周围胆管癌(PHC)是一种预后不良的恶性肿瘤,机器人手术在其治疗中的作用仍存在争议。本系统综述旨在评估机器人手术治疗PHC的可行性。方法:按照PRISMA指南,在Medline、Cochrane Library和Web of Science中系统检索2000 - 2024年PHC机器人手术的英语研究文献。结果:在最初确定的405篇论文中,5项研究包括110名患者符合纳入标准。合并分析显示,手术时间276 (170-500)~ 840 (770-890)min,术中出血量125 (50-425)~ 700 (600-800)ml,总发病率50.0%,主要发病率13.6%。术后30天和90天死亡率分别为1.8%和1.9%。78.2%的患者实现了R0切除,中位淋巴结切除7(8±6.6)至11(6-31)。随访时间7.5(8.3±2.3)~ 15(19±16)个月,14.3%(6/42)的患者出现复发。结论:机器人手术治疗PHC具有良好的围手术期效果;然而,需要进一步的研究来评估其与传统方法相比的长期肿瘤疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
12.90%
发文量
890
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Uniquely positioned at the interface between various medical and surgical disciplines, Surgical Endoscopy serves as a focal point for the international surgical community to exchange information on practice, theory, and research. Topics covered in the journal include: -Surgical aspects of: Interventional endoscopy, Ultrasound, Other techniques in the fields of gastroenterology, obstetrics, gynecology, and urology, -Gastroenterologic surgery -Thoracic surgery -Traumatic surgery -Orthopedic surgery -Pediatric surgery
期刊最新文献
Comparative benefits of robotic gastrectomy over laparoscopic surgery across different age and BMI groups. Balloon dilation versus endoscopic stricturotomy in the treatment of Crohn's anastomotic stricture: experimental randomized study. Comparative seven year outcomes of RYGB and SADI-S as revisional procedures for weight recurrence regain after sleeve gastrectomy: weight loss trajectory, reflux control, and metabolic safety. Comparison of laparoscopic and robotic surgery for inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastric ischemic conditioning before esophagectomy: contemporary practices and insights from an international survey.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1