Doctors' preferences in the choice of antibacterial drugs in pregnant women (PIKAP study).

IF 0.8 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RISK & SAFETY IN MEDICINE Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-14 DOI:10.1177/09246479251327814
Roman A Bontsevich, Oxana M Zarudskaya, Anna V Adonina
{"title":"Doctors' preferences in the choice of antibacterial drugs in pregnant women (PIKAP study).","authors":"Roman A Bontsevich, Oxana M Zarudskaya, Anna V Adonina","doi":"10.1177/09246479251327814","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundThe use of rational and safe antibiotic therapies for pregnant women remains an important issue within the medical community.ObjectiveTo analyze the preferences in the choice of antimicrobial drugs (AMD) among obstetricians-gynecologists of Central Russia in treatment of infectious diseases in pregnancy.MethodsThis is anonymous survey of obstetrician and gynecology specialists conducted in Central Russia between September 1st, and November 30th, 2017. Study included five healthcare facilities (ambulatory and in-patient), located in regional center, city Belgorod. Questionnaire contained six open-ended questions to evaluate AMD preferences in treatment of Chlamydia trachomatis, Mycoplasma hominis or genitalium, Ureaplasma species, acute cystitis, pyelonephritis, and other conditions, such as placental insufficiency, fetal growth restriction. Descriptive statistics was used including absolute and relative frequencies, minimum and maximum values, mean, frequency of prescribing AMD, and their proportion in the total number prescribed.ResultsA total of 52 responses were included in final analysis. There was significant rate of 15.4% of prescribing pregnancy unsafe (fluoroquinolones, tetracyclines) or non-rational AMD or deviation from existing clinical protocols and guidelines.ConclusionsThere were large variations in provider's AMD preference between healthcare facilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":45237,"journal":{"name":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RISK & SAFETY IN MEDICINE","volume":" ","pages":"124-133"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RISK & SAFETY IN MEDICINE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09246479251327814","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundThe use of rational and safe antibiotic therapies for pregnant women remains an important issue within the medical community.ObjectiveTo analyze the preferences in the choice of antimicrobial drugs (AMD) among obstetricians-gynecologists of Central Russia in treatment of infectious diseases in pregnancy.MethodsThis is anonymous survey of obstetrician and gynecology specialists conducted in Central Russia between September 1st, and November 30th, 2017. Study included five healthcare facilities (ambulatory and in-patient), located in regional center, city Belgorod. Questionnaire contained six open-ended questions to evaluate AMD preferences in treatment of Chlamydia trachomatis, Mycoplasma hominis or genitalium, Ureaplasma species, acute cystitis, pyelonephritis, and other conditions, such as placental insufficiency, fetal growth restriction. Descriptive statistics was used including absolute and relative frequencies, minimum and maximum values, mean, frequency of prescribing AMD, and their proportion in the total number prescribed.ResultsA total of 52 responses were included in final analysis. There was significant rate of 15.4% of prescribing pregnancy unsafe (fluoroquinolones, tetracyclines) or non-rational AMD or deviation from existing clinical protocols and guidelines.ConclusionsThere were large variations in provider's AMD preference between healthcare facilities.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医生对孕妇抗菌药物选择的偏好(PIKAP研究)。
对孕妇使用合理、安全的抗生素治疗仍然是医学界的一个重要问题。目的分析俄罗斯中部地区妇产科医生在妊娠期感染性疾病治疗中抗菌药物(AMD)的选择偏好。方法2017年9月1日至11月30日在俄罗斯中部对妇产科专家进行匿名调查。研究对象包括位于别尔哥罗德市区域中心的五家医疗机构(门诊和住院)。问卷包含6个开放式问题,以评估AMD在治疗沙眼衣原体、人支原体或生殖道、脲原体、急性膀胱炎、肾盂肾炎以及胎盘功能不全、胎儿生长受限等其他疾病时的偏好。采用描述性统计,包括AMD的绝对频率和相对频率、最小值和最大值、平均值、处方频率及其占处方总数的比例。结果共纳入52份调查问卷。处方妊娠不安全(氟喹诺酮类、四环素类)、非理性AMD或偏离现有临床方案和指南的比例为15.4%。结论不同医疗机构提供者对AMD的偏好存在较大差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RISK & SAFETY IN MEDICINE
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RISK & SAFETY IN MEDICINE PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
17.60%
发文量
102
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Risk and Safety in Medicine is concerned with rendering the practice of medicine as safe as it can be; that involves promoting the highest possible quality of care, but also examining how those risks which are inevitable can be contained and managed. This is not exclusively a drugs journal. Recently it was decided to include in the subtitle of the journal three items to better indicate the scope of the journal, i.e. patient safety, pharmacovigilance and liability and the Editorial Board was adjusted accordingly. For each of these sections an Associate Editor was invited. We especially want to emphasize patient safety.
期刊最新文献
A comparative analysis of logistic regression (LR) and artificial neural network (ANN) models for predicting antimicrobial resistance in surgical ICU patients: Insights from real-world evidence in India. U.S. hand injury-related finger infections requiring emergency department visits, NEISS 2019-2023. Impact of mobile phone-emitted non-ionizing electromagnetic radiation on parotid gland function: A comprehensive study. A case report on azathioprine induced anagen effluvium, plica polonica, and bicytopenia in a patient of vitiligo. Factors affecting patient safety culture and adverse drug reaction reporting among healthcare professionals in an Indonesian public hospital: A cross-sectional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1