A Systematic Review of Regenerative Medicine Therapies for Axial Spine Pain of Facet Joint Origin.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Current Pain and Headache Reports Pub Date : 2025-03-14 DOI:10.1007/s11916-025-01376-1
Laxmaiah Manchikanti, Alaa Abd-Elsayed, Alan D Kaye, Mahendra R Sanapati, Vidyasagar Pampati, Sahar Shekoohi, Joshua A Hirsch
{"title":"A Systematic Review of Regenerative Medicine Therapies for Axial Spine Pain of Facet Joint Origin.","authors":"Laxmaiah Manchikanti, Alaa Abd-Elsayed, Alan D Kaye, Mahendra R Sanapati, Vidyasagar Pampati, Sahar Shekoohi, Joshua A Hirsch","doi":"10.1007/s11916-025-01376-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This review aims to assess the effectiveness of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections in treating axial spinal pain originating from the facet joints. A systematic evaluation of available evidence on these biological therapies was conducted to determine their clinical utility.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Recent studies emphasize the therapeutic promise of intraarticular biologics, including MSCs, PRP, and alpha-2-macroglobulin, in managing facet joint-related axial spinal pain. Emerging evidence suggests improvements in pain relief, physical function, and quality of life following these treatments. Based on our search criteria, 20 publications were identified and considered for inclusion. Of these, 4 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 6 observational studies met the inclusion criteria. Among the RCTs, 3 trials involved lumbar facet joints, and one trial involved cervical facet joints using PRP. Among the observational studies, 4 studies used PRP, with 3 focusing on the lumbar spine and one study, with 2 publications, on the cervical spine, and only 2 studies evaluated stem cell treatments. The summary of evidence utilizing various criteria, including Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) evidence synthesis, the evidence for PRP injections in facet joints is Level II, or moderate, and Level IV, or limited, overall, with low certainty. For PRP, the recommendation is moderate, and for MSCs, the recommendation is weak.</p>","PeriodicalId":50602,"journal":{"name":"Current Pain and Headache Reports","volume":"29 1","pages":"61"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Pain and Headache Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-025-01376-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: This review aims to assess the effectiveness of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections in treating axial spinal pain originating from the facet joints. A systematic evaluation of available evidence on these biological therapies was conducted to determine their clinical utility.

Recent findings: Recent studies emphasize the therapeutic promise of intraarticular biologics, including MSCs, PRP, and alpha-2-macroglobulin, in managing facet joint-related axial spinal pain. Emerging evidence suggests improvements in pain relief, physical function, and quality of life following these treatments. Based on our search criteria, 20 publications were identified and considered for inclusion. Of these, 4 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 6 observational studies met the inclusion criteria. Among the RCTs, 3 trials involved lumbar facet joints, and one trial involved cervical facet joints using PRP. Among the observational studies, 4 studies used PRP, with 3 focusing on the lumbar spine and one study, with 2 publications, on the cervical spine, and only 2 studies evaluated stem cell treatments. The summary of evidence utilizing various criteria, including Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) evidence synthesis, the evidence for PRP injections in facet joints is Level II, or moderate, and Level IV, or limited, overall, with low certainty. For PRP, the recommendation is moderate, and for MSCs, the recommendation is weak.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
综述目的:本综述旨在评估间充质干细胞(MSCs)和富血小板血浆(PRP)注射治疗源于面关节的脊柱轴向疼痛的有效性。我们对这些生物疗法的现有证据进行了系统评估,以确定其临床效用:最近的研究强调了关节内生物制剂(包括间充质干细胞、PRP和α-2-巨球蛋白)在治疗面关节相关脊柱轴性疼痛方面的治疗前景。新的证据表明,这些治疗方法可改善疼痛缓解、身体功能和生活质量。根据我们的搜索标准,共发现并考虑纳入 20 篇出版物。其中,4 项随机对照试验 (RCT) 和 6 项观察性研究符合纳入标准。在随机对照试验中,3 项试验涉及腰椎面关节,1 项试验涉及使用 PRP 的颈椎面关节。在观察性研究中,有4项研究使用了PRP,其中3项侧重于腰椎,1项研究(发表了2篇论文)侧重于颈椎,只有2项研究对干细胞疗法进行了评估。利用各种标准(包括《建议、评估、发展与评价分级》(GRADE)证据综合法)进行的证据总结显示,PRP注射治疗面关节的证据等级为二级(或中等),四级(或有限),总体确定性较低。对于 PRP,推荐程度为中度,而对于间充质干细胞,推荐程度为弱度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current Pain and Headache Reports
Current Pain and Headache Reports CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.70%
发文量
91
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal aims to review the most important, recently published clinical findings regarding the diagnosis, treatment, and management of pain and headache. By providing clear, insightful, balanced contributions by international experts, the journal intends to serve all those involved in the care and prevention of pain and headache. We accomplish this aim by appointing international authorities to serve as Section Editors in key subject areas, such as anesthetic techniques in pain management, cluster headache, neuropathic pain, and migraine. Section Editors, in turn, select topics for which leading experts contribute comprehensive review articles that emphasize new developments and recently published papers of major importance, highlighted by annotated reference lists. An international Editorial Board reviews the annual table of contents, suggests articles of special interest to their country/region, and ensures that topics are current and include emerging research. Commentaries from well-known figures in the field are also provided.
期刊最新文献
Trends in Mixed Pain Research Over Three Decades (1993-2024): A Bibliometric Analysis. Ultrasound Guided Genicular Nerve Blocks for Pain Management Following Total Knee Replacement: A Narrative Review. The Current Status and Future Prospects of Intra-articular Injection Therapy for Hip Osteoarthritis: A Review. Perioperative Pain Management for Major Limb Amputation - A Systematic-Narrative Hybrid Review. A Systematic Review of Sacroiliac Joint Injections of Platelet-Rich Plasma (Prp) and Stem Cells.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1