Characterization of Dynamic Adaptation to Stressors using Multi-System Stimulus-Response Data: The Study of Physical Resilience in Aging Pilot

Karen Bandeen-Roche, Jiafeng Zhu, Qian-Li Xue, Brian Buta, Thomas Laskow, Jeremy D Walston, Ravi Varadhan
{"title":"Characterization of Dynamic Adaptation to Stressors using Multi-System Stimulus-Response Data: The Study of Physical Resilience in Aging Pilot","authors":"Karen Bandeen-Roche, Jiafeng Zhu, Qian-Li Xue, Brian Buta, Thomas Laskow, Jeremy D Walston, Ravi Varadhan","doi":"10.1093/gerona/glaf056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Resilience to stressors has emerged as a major gerontological concept aiming to promote more positive outcomes for older adults. Achieving this aim relies on determining mechanisms underlying capacity to respond resiliently. This paper seeks proof of principle for the hypothesis that physical aspects of said capacity are rooted in the fitness of one’s physiology governing stress response, conceptualized as a dynamical system. The Study of Physical Resilience in Aging (“SPRING”) leveraged stimulus-response experiments to characterize physiological fitness in older adults scheduled for one of three major stressors: Total knee replacement, incident hemodialysis, or bone marrow transplant in hematological cancer. Here we analyze Holter monitor time series characterizing heart rate variability (HRV), cortisol responses to adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) stimulation, and repeated diurnal salivary cortisol assessment in the SPRING pilot (n=79). Principal component analysis was applied anticipating steady-state and “adaptation” mechanisms underlying the repeated physiological measures. Analytic features evidenced these mechanisms, supporting construct validity. Component scores were analyzed by major stressor, hypothesized surrogate physiologic measures (physical frailty phenotype, self-report of health), and demographic, health and behavioral characteristics. Scores differed substantially by stressor type and the surrogate physiologic measures, evidencing criterion validity. Our data support that HRV, ACTH and salivary cortisol stimulus-response data jointly assess adaptation capacity across three major stressors. We believe that SPRING is the first study in humans to concurrently query multiple physiologic systems using stimulus-response tests. Our findings lay groundwork for future validation with further data and to better forecast resilience of older adults to clinical stressors.","PeriodicalId":22892,"journal":{"name":"The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glaf056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Resilience to stressors has emerged as a major gerontological concept aiming to promote more positive outcomes for older adults. Achieving this aim relies on determining mechanisms underlying capacity to respond resiliently. This paper seeks proof of principle for the hypothesis that physical aspects of said capacity are rooted in the fitness of one’s physiology governing stress response, conceptualized as a dynamical system. The Study of Physical Resilience in Aging (“SPRING”) leveraged stimulus-response experiments to characterize physiological fitness in older adults scheduled for one of three major stressors: Total knee replacement, incident hemodialysis, or bone marrow transplant in hematological cancer. Here we analyze Holter monitor time series characterizing heart rate variability (HRV), cortisol responses to adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) stimulation, and repeated diurnal salivary cortisol assessment in the SPRING pilot (n=79). Principal component analysis was applied anticipating steady-state and “adaptation” mechanisms underlying the repeated physiological measures. Analytic features evidenced these mechanisms, supporting construct validity. Component scores were analyzed by major stressor, hypothesized surrogate physiologic measures (physical frailty phenotype, self-report of health), and demographic, health and behavioral characteristics. Scores differed substantially by stressor type and the surrogate physiologic measures, evidencing criterion validity. Our data support that HRV, ACTH and salivary cortisol stimulus-response data jointly assess adaptation capacity across three major stressors. We believe that SPRING is the first study in humans to concurrently query multiple physiologic systems using stimulus-response tests. Our findings lay groundwork for future validation with further data and to better forecast resilience of older adults to clinical stressors.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Ethnic and Sex Differences in the Association Between Organochlorine Exposure and Cognitive Function in Late Life Cognitive Performance and Long-term Exposure to Outdoor Air Pollution: Findings from the Harmonised Cognitive Assessment Protocol Sub-Study of the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA-HCAP) Epigenetic Clocks Relate to Four Age-Related Health Outcomes Similarly across Three Countries Characterization of Dynamic Adaptation to Stressors using Multi-System Stimulus-Response Data: The Study of Physical Resilience in Aging Pilot Proceedings of the Alzheimer’s Diagnosis in Older Adults with Chronic Conditions (ADACC) Network Inaugural Annual Conference
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1