{"title":"A scoping review of digital health technologies in multimorbidity management: mechanisms, outcomes, challenges, and strategies.","authors":"Aklilu Endalamaw, Anteneh Zewdie, Eskinder Wolka, Yibeltal Assefa","doi":"10.1186/s12913-025-12548-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Multimorbidity amplifies healthcare burdens due to the intricate requirements of patients and the pathophysiological complexities of multiple diseases. To address this, digital health technologies play a crucial role in effective healthcare delivery, requiring comprehensive evidence on their applications in managing multimorbidity. Therefore, this scoping review aims to identify various types of digital health technologies, explore their mechanisms, and identify barriers and facilitators within the context of multimorbidity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This scoping review follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Scoping Reviews guidelines. PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Google Scholar were used to search articles. Data extraction focused on study characteristics, types of health technologies, mechanisms, outcomes, challenges, and facilitators. Results were presented using figures, tables, and texts. Thematic analysis was employed to describe mechanisms, impacts, challenges, and strategies related to digital health technologies in managing multimorbidity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Digital health technology encompasses smartphone apps, wearable devices, and platforms for remote healthcare (telehealth). These technologies work through care coordination, collaboration, communication, self-management, remote monitoring, health data management, and tele-referrals. Digital health technologies improved quality of care and life, cost efficiency, acceptability of care, collaboration, streamlined healthcare delivery, reduced workload, and bridging knowledge gaps. Patients' and healthcare providers' resistance and skills, lack of support (technical, financial, and infrastructure), and ethical concerns (e.g., privacy) barred digital health technologies implementation. Arranging organization, providing technical support, employing care coordination strategies, enhancing acceptability, deploying appropriate technology, considering patient needs, and adhering with ethical principles facilitate digital health technologies implementation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Digital health technology holds significant promise in improving care for individuals with multimorbidity by enhancing coordination, self-management, and monitoring. Successful implementation requires addressing challenges such as patient resistance and infrastructure limitations through targeted strategies and investments. It is also essential to consider usability, privacy, and trustworthiness when adopting these tools.</p>","PeriodicalId":9012,"journal":{"name":"BMC Health Services Research","volume":"25 1","pages":"382"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11909923/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-12548-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Multimorbidity amplifies healthcare burdens due to the intricate requirements of patients and the pathophysiological complexities of multiple diseases. To address this, digital health technologies play a crucial role in effective healthcare delivery, requiring comprehensive evidence on their applications in managing multimorbidity. Therefore, this scoping review aims to identify various types of digital health technologies, explore their mechanisms, and identify barriers and facilitators within the context of multimorbidity.
Methods: This scoping review follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Scoping Reviews guidelines. PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Google Scholar were used to search articles. Data extraction focused on study characteristics, types of health technologies, mechanisms, outcomes, challenges, and facilitators. Results were presented using figures, tables, and texts. Thematic analysis was employed to describe mechanisms, impacts, challenges, and strategies related to digital health technologies in managing multimorbidity.
Results: Digital health technology encompasses smartphone apps, wearable devices, and platforms for remote healthcare (telehealth). These technologies work through care coordination, collaboration, communication, self-management, remote monitoring, health data management, and tele-referrals. Digital health technologies improved quality of care and life, cost efficiency, acceptability of care, collaboration, streamlined healthcare delivery, reduced workload, and bridging knowledge gaps. Patients' and healthcare providers' resistance and skills, lack of support (technical, financial, and infrastructure), and ethical concerns (e.g., privacy) barred digital health technologies implementation. Arranging organization, providing technical support, employing care coordination strategies, enhancing acceptability, deploying appropriate technology, considering patient needs, and adhering with ethical principles facilitate digital health technologies implementation.
Conclusions: Digital health technology holds significant promise in improving care for individuals with multimorbidity by enhancing coordination, self-management, and monitoring. Successful implementation requires addressing challenges such as patient resistance and infrastructure limitations through targeted strategies and investments. It is also essential to consider usability, privacy, and trustworthiness when adopting these tools.
由于患者的复杂需求和多种疾病的病理生理复杂性,多病加重了医疗负担。为解决这一问题,数字卫生技术在有效提供卫生保健服务方面发挥着至关重要的作用,需要全面证据证明其在管理多重疾病方面的应用。因此,本范围审查旨在确定各种类型的数字卫生技术,探索其机制,并确定多病背景下的障碍和促进因素。方法:此范围审查遵循范围审查的首选报告项目指南。使用PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science、EMBASE和谷歌Scholar检索文章。数据提取侧重于研究特征、卫生技术类型、机制、结果、挑战和促进因素。结果以图表、表格和文本的形式呈现。采用专题分析来描述与数字卫生技术在管理多重疾病方面相关的机制、影响、挑战和战略。结果:数字医疗技术包括智能手机应用程序、可穿戴设备和远程医疗(远程医疗)平台。这些技术通过护理协调、协作、沟通、自我管理、远程监测、健康数据管理和远程转诊发挥作用。数字医疗技术改善了护理质量和生活质量、成本效率、护理可接受性、协作、简化了医疗保健服务、减少了工作量并弥合了知识差距。患者和医疗保健提供者的抵制和技能、缺乏支持(技术、财务和基础设施)以及道德问题(如隐私)阻碍了数字医疗技术的实施。安排组织、提供技术支持、采用护理协调策略、提高可接受性、部署适当的技术、考虑患者需求以及遵守道德原则有助于实现数字卫生技术。结论:数字卫生技术通过加强协调、自我管理和监测,在改善对多病个体的护理方面具有重要的前景。成功实施需要通过有针对性的战略和投资解决患者耐药性和基础设施限制等挑战。在采用这些工具时,还必须考虑可用性、隐私性和可信度。
期刊介绍:
BMC Health Services Research is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of health services research, including delivery of care, management of health services, assessment of healthcare needs, measurement of outcomes, allocation of healthcare resources, evaluation of different health markets and health services organizations, international comparative analysis of health systems, health economics and the impact of health policies and regulations.