Impact of enhanced recovery after surgery concept process optimization on the perioperative period of gynecologic laparoscopic surgery.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY BMC Women's Health Pub Date : 2025-03-14 DOI:10.1186/s12905-025-03626-1
Ou Jin, Tiebing Xu, Juan Lai, Junxia He, Yongfeng Wu, Xiaomin Yang
{"title":"Impact of enhanced recovery after surgery concept process optimization on the perioperative period of gynecologic laparoscopic surgery.","authors":"Ou Jin, Tiebing Xu, Juan Lai, Junxia He, Yongfeng Wu, Xiaomin Yang","doi":"10.1186/s12905-025-03626-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To explore the impact of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) optimization concept process on the perioperative period of gynecologic laparoscopic surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective observational study included patients who underwent gynecologic laparoscopic surgery based on ERAS concept process optimization (ERAS group) for uterine fibroids, adenomyosis, and ovarian cysts at Jiaxing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine between January 2023 and December 2023. Patients who underwent the same laparoscopic protocol without ERAS concept process optimization between January 2022 and December 2022 were matched as the control group (non-ERAS group). Postoperative indexes and patient satisfaction were compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 120 patients were included, with 60 of who underwent gynecologic laparoscopic surgery (total laparoscopic hysterectomy, TLH: n = 20; laparoscopic myomectomy, LM: n = 20; laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy, LOC: n = 20) based on ERAS (ERAS group), and the other 60 of who underwent gynecologic laparoscopic surgery (TLH: n = 20, LM: n = 20, LOC: n = 20) without ERAS (non-ERAS). In patients received gynecologic laparoscopic surgery of ERAS group, the time of first postoperative gas evacuation, the time of semi-liquid recovery, the time of urination, the time of incision pain, and the length of hospital stay were significantly shorter (all P < 0.001), and the number of nausea and vomiting was significantly reduced (all P < 0.001) compared with those in the non-ERAS group. Besides, satisfaction of patients receiving ERAS was significantly higher than in the non-ERAS group (TLH: P < 0.01; LM and LOC: P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ERAS optimization for gynecologic laparoscopic surgery improved patients' outcomes, reduced complications, and improved patient's satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":9204,"journal":{"name":"BMC Women's Health","volume":"25 1","pages":"120"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11907852/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Women's Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-025-03626-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To explore the impact of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) optimization concept process on the perioperative period of gynecologic laparoscopic surgery.

Methods: This retrospective observational study included patients who underwent gynecologic laparoscopic surgery based on ERAS concept process optimization (ERAS group) for uterine fibroids, adenomyosis, and ovarian cysts at Jiaxing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine between January 2023 and December 2023. Patients who underwent the same laparoscopic protocol without ERAS concept process optimization between January 2022 and December 2022 were matched as the control group (non-ERAS group). Postoperative indexes and patient satisfaction were compared between the two groups.

Results: A total of 120 patients were included, with 60 of who underwent gynecologic laparoscopic surgery (total laparoscopic hysterectomy, TLH: n = 20; laparoscopic myomectomy, LM: n = 20; laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy, LOC: n = 20) based on ERAS (ERAS group), and the other 60 of who underwent gynecologic laparoscopic surgery (TLH: n = 20, LM: n = 20, LOC: n = 20) without ERAS (non-ERAS). In patients received gynecologic laparoscopic surgery of ERAS group, the time of first postoperative gas evacuation, the time of semi-liquid recovery, the time of urination, the time of incision pain, and the length of hospital stay were significantly shorter (all P < 0.001), and the number of nausea and vomiting was significantly reduced (all P < 0.001) compared with those in the non-ERAS group. Besides, satisfaction of patients receiving ERAS was significantly higher than in the non-ERAS group (TLH: P < 0.01; LM and LOC: P < 0.001).

Conclusions: ERAS optimization for gynecologic laparoscopic surgery improved patients' outcomes, reduced complications, and improved patient's satisfaction.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
提高术后恢复的理念流程优化对妇科腹腔镜手术围手术期的影响。
背景:探讨ERAS优化概念流程对妇科腹腔镜手术围手术期的影响。方法:本回顾性观察研究纳入2023年1月至2023年12月在嘉兴中医院行基于ERAS概念流程优化的妇科腹腔镜手术治疗子宫肌瘤、血囊、卵巢囊肿的患者(ERAS组)。在2022年1月至2022年12月期间接受相同腹腔镜方案但未进行ERAS概念流程优化的患者作为对照组(非ERAS组)。比较两组术后各项指标及患者满意度。结果:共纳入120例患者,其中60例行妇科腹腔镜手术(腹腔镜全子宫切除术,TLH: n = 20;腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术,LM: n = 20;基于ERAS的腹腔镜卵巢囊肿切除术,LOC: n = 20) (ERAS组),另60例接受未ERAS的妇科腹腔镜手术(TLH: n = 20, LM: n = 20, LOC: n = 20)(非ERAS组)。ERAS组接受妇科腹腔镜手术的患者,术后首次气体排出时间、半液体恢复时间、排尿时间、切口疼痛时间、住院时间均显著缩短(P)。结论:ERAS优化妇科腹腔镜手术改善了患者的预后,减少了并发症,提高了患者的满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Women's Health
BMC Women's Health OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
444
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Women''s Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the health and wellbeing of adolescent girls and women, with a particular focus on the physical, mental, and emotional health of women in developed and developing nations. The journal welcomes submissions on women''s public health issues, health behaviours, breast cancer, gynecological diseases, mental health and health promotion.
期刊最新文献
The relationship between women's awareness of sustainable menstrual cups, their menstrual attitudes, and genital hygiene behaviors: a cross-sectional study. The relationship between climate change anxiety levels and fertility awareness levels in a sample of women in Turkey: a cross-sectional study. Correction: objective measures of physical activity and physical capacities in lipedema - a scoping review. Prevalence and associated factors of primary dysmenorrhea among women in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Women's self-employment, business acumen, and emotional IPV: a longitudinal study in Tanzania.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1